An application design supporting structured radiology reports

Radiologists use medical images to diagnose diseases. Today, medical images are commonly stored and displayed electronically. The radiologist describes the image interpretations in a report, and the electronic viewing of images opens a possibility for the radiology report to become computerized. By creating an application that supports the radiologist’s report generation, tools for creation of structured reports can be provided, generating more complete, clear reports, connected to the examination images. The structured report can also be encoded, to provide data for medical research and for statistics. This masters’ thesis establishes the requirements on a structured reporting application, by means of a literature review and by user interviews and meetings. Using the established requirements, a structured reporting application was designed, and partly implemented as a prototype. The results show that an application for structured reporting has to be made adaptive, to support different usage areas, each having their own requirements on navigation, organization and workflow. It also has to support reuse of report components, and automatic generation of sections. The resulting reports should be encoded in DICOM SR (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine – Structured Reporting), using the report pattern established by IHE (Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise). To provide users with a complete set of radiological terms for generation of natural language, a medical dictionary should be used. User input can be made through data entry controls, and it should be possible for the user to, in an easy way, link images and add measurement values to the report content.

[1]  David Liu,et al.  Structured radiology reporting: a 4-year case study of 160,000 reports , 2001 .

[2]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  DICOM structured reporting: Part 2. Problems and challenges in implementation for PACS workstations. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[3]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[4]  Protima Banerjee,et al.  Book Review: About Face 2.0: The essentials of interaction design , 2004, Inf. Vis..

[5]  Bruce I. Reiner,et al.  The Cutting Edge: Strategies to Enhance Radiologist Workflow in a Filmless/Paperless Imaging Department , 2002, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[6]  A. J. Johnson,et al.  Radiology report quality: a cohort study of point-and-click structured reporting versus conventional dictation. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[7]  B. Schneirdeman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[8]  David A. Clunie,et al.  DICOM Structured Reporting , 2000 .

[9]  David Liu,et al.  Six Characteristics of Effective Structured Reporting and the Inevitable Integration with Speech Recognition , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[10]  Nina Lundberg Impacts of PACS on radiological work , 1999, GROUP '99.

[11]  Douglas S. Bell,et al.  Structured entry of radiology reports using World Wide Web technology. , 1996, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  Jon Trinder,et al.  The Humane Interface: New Directions for Designing Interactive Systems , 2002, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[13]  Marco Eichelberg,et al.  A survey and analysis of Electronic Healthcare Record standards , 2005, CSUR.

[14]  A Hanbidge,et al.  Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.