The Explicit and Implicit Perception of In-Group Members Who Use Stereotypes: Blatant Rejection but Subtle Conformity

The effects that emerge when one observes an in-group member using a stereotype are investigated. It is hypothesized that, despite open disapproval (pilot study), people are more likely to conform to such a source rather than to a source who does not rely on stereotypes. In both the reported studies, participants were presented with the description of a Northern African (a stereotyped out-group member) provided by an in-group member and were asked to form an impression of the Northern African. The description was manipulated to be either stereotypic or counterstereotypic. While forming the impression, participants were also asked to perform an unrelated estimation task where the in-group member's estimates could serve as possible anchors (Study 1), or they were asked to judge the truthfulness of subsequent factual statements read by the in-group member (Study 2). Results from both studies consistently show that, when the source had previously relied on the stereotype in his description, conformity was more likely. This phenomenon is discussed in light of current models of stereotyping, pointing out the limitations and suggesting some possible directions for future research.

[1]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Social Identity Processes: Trends in Theory and Research , 2000 .

[2]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A model of dual attitudes. , 2000, Psychological review.

[3]  C. Stangor,et al.  Prejudice : the target's perspective , 1999 .

[4]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[6]  Janet B. Ruscher,et al.  Prejudice and Stereotyping in Everyday Communication , 1998 .

[7]  S. Spencer,et al.  Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others , 1997 .

[8]  C. Judd,et al.  Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? , 1997 .

[10]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Further Progress in Understanding the Effects of Derogatory Ethnic Labels: The Role of Preexisting Attitudes Toward the Targeted Group , 1996 .

[11]  Mark Schaller,et al.  Dynamic Social Impact and the Evolution of Social Representations: A Natural History of Stereotypes. , 1996 .

[12]  C. Stangor,et al.  Stereotypes and Stereotyping , 1996 .

[13]  R. Fazio,et al.  Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Kathryn C. Oleson,et al.  Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[16]  C. Stangor,et al.  The role of memory biases in stereotype maintenance. , 1994, The British journal of social psychology.

[17]  D. Mackie,et al.  The social cognition analysis of social influence: Contributions to the understanding of persuasion and conformity. , 1994 .

[18]  Patricia G. Devine,et al.  Social cognition: Impact on social psychology. , 1994 .

[19]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Judgment in a Social Context: Biases, Shortcomings, and the Logic of Conversation , 1994 .

[20]  M. J. Monteith,et al.  Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. , 1993 .

[21]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[22]  A. Elliot,et al.  Prejudice with and without compunction , 1991 .

[23]  L. Vaughn,et al.  Reducing the Expression of Racial Prejudice , 1991 .

[24]  G. Semin,et al.  Language use in intergroup contexts: the linguistic intergroup bias. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[26]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism , 1986 .

[27]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Prejudice, discrimination, and racism: Historical trends and contemporary approaches. , 1986 .

[28]  J. Dovidio,et al.  The aversive form of racism. , 1986 .

[29]  Tom Pyszczynski,et al.  The effect of an overheard ethnic slur on evaluations of the target: How to spread a social disease. , 1985 .

[30]  G. Bower,et al.  Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. , 1980 .

[31]  F. Crosby,et al.  Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. , 1980 .

[32]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. , 1979, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[34]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Opinion divergence as a strategy to avoid being miscast. , 1969 .

[35]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[36]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .