A computerized assessment to compare the impact of standard, stereoscopic, and high-definition laparoscopic monitor displays on surgical technique

BackgroundSurgeons performing laparoscopic surgery have strong biases regarding the quality and nature of the laparoscopic video monitor display. In a comparative study, we used a unique computerized sensing and analysis system to evaluate the various types of monitors employed in laparoscopic surgery.MethodsWe compared the impact of different types of monitor displays on an individual’s performance of a laparoscopic training task which required the subject to move the instrument to a set of targets. Participants (varying from no laparoscopic experience to board-certified surgeons) were asked to perform the assigned task while using all three display systems, which were randomly assigned: a conventional laparoscopic monitor system (2D), a high-definition monitor system (HD), and a stereoscopic display (3D). The effects of monitor system on various performance parameters (total time consumed to finish the task, average speed, and movement economy) were analyzed by computer. Each of the subjects filled out a subjective questionnaire at the end of their training session.ResultsA total of 27 participants completed our study. Performance with the HD monitor was significantly slower than with either the 3D or 2D monitor (p < 0.0001). Movement economy with the HD monitor was significantly reduced compared with the 3D (p < 0.0004) or 2D (p < 0.0001) monitor. In terms of average time required to complete the task, performance with the 3D monitor was significantly faster than with the HD (p < 0.0001) or 2D (p < 0.0086) monitor. However, the HD system was the overwhelming favorite according to subjective evaluation.ConclusionComputerized sensing and analysis is capable of quantitatively assessing the seemingly minor effect of monitor display on surgical training performance. The study demonstrates that, while users expressed a decided preference for HD systems, actual quantitative analysis indicates that HD monitors offer no statistically significant advantage and may even worsen performance compared with standard 2D or 3D laparoscopic monitors.

[1]  G. Andriole,et al.  Three-Dimensional (3D) Vision: Does It Improve Laparoscopic Skills? An Assessment of a 3D Head-Mounted Visualization System. , 2005, Reviews in urology.

[2]  Just L. Herder,et al.  Development of laparoscopic instruments , 2001, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[3]  G. F. Buess,et al.  The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  Influence of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Imaging on Endoscopic Bowel Suturing , 2000, World Journal of Surgery.

[5]  A. Kaufman,et al.  The relationship of hand dominance to the motor corrdination, mental ability, and right-left awareness of young normal children. , 1978, Child development.

[6]  Edie R. Hapner,et al.  Blinded Evaluation of the Effects of High Definition and Magnification on Perceived Image Quality in Laryngeal Imaging , 2006, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[7]  G. Berci,et al.  Performance differences in laparoscopic surgical skills between true high-definition and three-chip CCD video systems , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  Jerzy W. Rozenblit,et al.  SURGICAL TRAINING AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT USING A MOTION TRACKING SYSTEM , 2006 .

[9]  J. Fann,et al.  Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  John M. Flach,et al.  Hand-eye coordination in an endoscopic surgery simulation , 1996, Proceedings Third Annual Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems. HICS'96.

[12]  B. Dunkin,et al.  Surgical simulation: a current review , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Ronald S Weinstein,et al.  Effect of camera resolution and bandwidth on facial affect recognition. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[14]  H. Heuer.  The effects of weak perturbations on rapid finger oscillations. , 2002, Human movement science.

[15]  P. Schauer,et al.  The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.