Successful new product team leaders

Abstract This article examines differences between more and less effective new product development team leaders. We found that successful leaders understood and accepted project goals, perceived more autonomy in managing their projects, and perceived more senior management support for their projects. Moreover, successful leaders learned significantly different lessons from their projects than their less successful colleagues. A discussion of the results, along with several implications for new product development, is presented.

[1]  J. Hackman,et al.  Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey , 1975 .

[2]  J. T. Barnowe,et al.  Leadership and performance outcomes in research organizations: The supervisor of scientists as a source of assistance , 1975 .

[3]  H. H. Kassarjian.  Content Analysis in Consumer Research , 1977 .

[4]  David Wilemon,et al.  Leadership Differences in New Product Development Teams , 1989 .

[5]  G. Latham,et al.  A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations , 1975 .

[6]  George F. Farris.  The Technical Supervisor: Beyond the Peter Principle , 1974, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[7]  F.Axel Johne,et al.  Product development approaches in established firms , 1989 .

[8]  J. Hackman,et al.  Employee reactions to job characteristics. , 1971 .

[9]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[10]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  R&D performance as a function of internal communication, project management, and the nature of the work , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  R. Cooper.  New Product Strategies: What Distinguishes the Top Performers? , 1984 .

[12]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[13]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  The role of task-goal attributes in employee performance. , 1974 .

[14]  A. Rubenstein,et al.  Factors Influencing Innovation Success at the Project Level , 1976 .

[15]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Learning in new technology development teams , 1989 .

[16]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Industrial Jobs and the Worker , 1966 .

[17]  W A Randolph,et al.  What every manager needs to know about project management. , 1988, Sloan management review.

[18]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[19]  E. A. Locke.  Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[20]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  The determinants of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis. , 1985 .

[21]  Dennis W. Organ,et al.  Intentional vs arousal effects of goal-setting , 1977 .

[22]  F. M. Andrews,et al.  SUPERVISORY PRACTICES AND INNOVATION IN SCIENTIFIC TEAMS , 1967 .

[23]  E. McDonough,et al.  Effective Control of New Product Projects: The Interaction of Organization Culture and Project Leadership , 1986 .

[24]  R. Kanter.  The Change Masters , 1983 .

[25]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  Goal setting and the task process: I. An interactive influence on individual performance , 1976 .

[26]  T. M. Nevens,et al.  Commercializing technology: What the best companies do , 1990 .

[27]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Technology and Change , 1967 .

[28]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[29]  W. B. Zachary,et al.  Managing creative individuals in high-technology research projects , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[30]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION, INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, GOAL DIFFICULTY, GOAL ACCEPTANCE, GOAL INSTRUMENTALITY, AND PERFORMANCE , 1978 .

[31]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Maryland vs Michigan vs Minnesota: Another look at the relationship of expectancy and goal difficulty to task performance , 1980 .

[32]  B. Zirger,et al.  A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the U.S. electronics industry , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[33]  R. Cooper.  New product success in industrial firms , 1982 .