Crystal Structure of Activated CheY

The crystal structure of BeF 3 − -activated CheY, with manganese in the magnesium binding site, was determined at 2.4-Å resolution. BeF 3 − bonds to Asp57, the normal site of phosphorylation, forming a hydrogen bond and salt bridge with Thr87 and Lys109, respectively. The six coordination sites for manganese are satisfied by a fluorine of BeF 3 − , the side chain oxygens of Asp13 and Asp57, the carbonyl oxygen of Asn59, and two water molecules. All of the active site interactions seen for BeF 3 − -CheY are also observed in P-Spo0Ar. Thus, BeF 3 − activates CheY as well as other receiver domains by mimicking both the tetrahedral geometry and electrostatic potential of a phosphoryl group. The aromatic ring of Tyr106 is found buried within a hydrophobic pocket formed by β-strand β4 and helix H4. The tyrosine side chain is stabilized in this conformation by a hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group and the backbone carbonyl oxygen of Glu89. This hydrogen bond appears to stabilize the active conformation of the β4/H4 loop. Comparison of the backbone coordinates for the active and inactive states of CheY reveals that only modest changes occur upon activation, except in the loops, with the largest changes occurring in the β4/H4 loop. This region is known to be conformationally flexible in inactive CheY and is part of the surface used by activated CheY for binding its target, FliM. The pattern of activation-induced backbone coordinate changes is similar to that seen in FixJr. A common feature in the active sites of BeF 3 − -CheY, P-Spo0Ar, P-FixJr, and phosphono-CheY is a salt bridge between Lys109 Nζ and the phosphate or its equivalent, beryllofluoride. This suggests that, in addition to the concerted movements of Thr87 and Tyr106(Thr-Tyr coupling), formation of the Lys109-PO 3 − salt bridge is directly involved in the activation of receiver domains generally.

[1]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[2]  M. Welch,et al.  Effects of phosphorylation, Mg2+, and conformation of the chemotaxis protein CheY on its binding to the flagellar switch protein FliM. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[3]  D. Kern,et al.  Structural and functional analyses of activating amino acid substitutions in the receiver domain of NtrC: evidence for an activating surface. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  R. Bourret,et al.  Proposed Signal Transduction Role for Conserved CheY Residue Thr87, a Member of the Response Regulator Active-Site Quintet , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[6]  K. Volz,et al.  Structural conservation in the CheY superfamily. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[7]  G. Ditta,et al.  Isolation of phosphorylation‐deficient mutants of the Rhizobium Meliloti two‐component regulatory protein, FixJ , 1992, Molecular microbiology.

[8]  D. Kahn,et al.  Structural transitions in the FixJ receiver domain. , 1999, Structure.

[9]  C. Lecomte,et al.  Structure and preliminary electron distribution of copper heptanoate from room-temperature X-ray data , 1994 .

[10]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Communication modules in bacterial signaling proteins. , 1992, Annual review of genetics.

[11]  A. Brunger Free R value: a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures. , 1992 .

[12]  D. Wemmer,et al.  Beryllofluoride mimics phosphorylation of NtrC and other bacterial response regulators. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  G J Kleywegt,et al.  Software for handling macromolecular envelopes. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[14]  J. Stock,et al.  Divalent metal ion binding to the CheY protein and its significance to phosphotransfer in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[15]  J. Falke,et al.  Novel ion specificity of a carboxylate cluster Mg(II) binding site: strong charge selectivity and weak size selectivity. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[16]  C. Sander,et al.  Errors in protein structures , 1996, Nature.

[17]  A. Wilkinson,et al.  Phosphorylated aspartate in the structure of a response regulator protein. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  D. Kahn,et al.  Conformational changes induced by phosphorylation of the FixJ receiver domain. , 1999, Structure.

[19]  Brian F. Volkman,et al.  Structure of a transiently phosphorylated switch in bacterial signal transduction , 2000, Nature.

[20]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[21]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  Assignments, secondary structure, global fold, and dynamics of chemotaxis Y protein using three- and four-dimensional heteronuclear (13C,15N) NMR spectroscopy. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[22]  Ann M Stock,et al.  Structural analysis of bacterial chemotaxis proteins: components of a dynamic signaling system. , 1998, Journal of structural biology.

[23]  P. Matsumura,et al.  Crystal Structures of CheY Mutants Y106W and T87I/Y106W , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  G. Leonard,et al.  Domain swapping in the sporulation response regulator Spo0A. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[26]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  Identification of the binding interfaces on CheY for two of its targets, the phosphatase CheZ and the flagellar switch protein fliM. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  L. Serrano,et al.  1H- and 15N-NMR assignment and solution structure of the chemotactic Escherichia coli Che Y protein. , 1993, European journal of biochemistry.

[28]  P. Matsumura,et al.  Bivalent-metal binding to CheY protein. Effect on protein conformation. , 1992, The Biochemical journal.

[29]  G. Petsko,et al.  Structure of the Mg(2+)-bound form of CheY and mechanism of phosphoryl transfer in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[30]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[31]  Victoria A. Feher,et al.  Millisecond-timescale motions contribute to the function of the bacterial response regulator protein Spo0F , 1999, Nature.

[32]  F. Ausubel,et al.  Two-component regulatory systems responsive to environmental stimuli share strongly conserved domains with the nitrogen assimilation regulatory genes ntrB and ntrC. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  I. Ota,et al.  A yeast protein similar to bacterial two-component regulators. , 1993, Science.

[34]  L. Serrano,et al.  Towards understanding a molecular switch mechanism: thermodynamic and crystallographic studies of the signal transduction protein CheY. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  P. Matsumura,et al.  Tyrosine 106 of CheY plays an important role in chemotaxis signal transduction in Escherichia coli , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  Ann M Stock,et al.  Two-component signal transduction. , 2000, Annual review of biochemistry.

[37]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  NMR structure of activated CheY. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  J. Stock,et al.  Roles of the highly conserved aspartate and lysine residues in the response regulator of bacterial chemotaxis. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[39]  D E Koshland,et al.  Identification of the site of phosphorylation of the chemotaxis response regulator protein, CheY. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  Seok-Yong Lee,et al.  Crystal structure of an activated response regulator bound to its target , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[41]  J. Stock,et al.  The histidine protein kinase superfamily. , 1999, Advances in microbial physiology.

[42]  D E Wemmer,et al.  Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. , 2001, Science.

[43]  L Serrano,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of two mutants of the signal transduction protein CheY suggest its molecular activation mechanism. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  D E Wemmer,et al.  Three-dimensional solution structure of the N-terminal receiver domain of NTRC. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[45]  J. Stock,et al.  Signal transduction in bacteria , 1990, Nature.

[46]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  The 1.9 A resolution crystal structure of phosphono-CheY, an analogue of the active form of the response regulator, CheY. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[47]  P. Matsumura,et al.  Crystal structure of Escherichia coli CheY refined at 1.7-A resolution. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.