Smart Contracts for Managing the Chain-of-Custody of Digital Evidence: A Practical Case of Study

The digital revolution is renewing many aspects of our lives, which is also a challenge in judicial processes, such as the Chain-of-Custody (CoC) process of any electronic evidence. A CoC management system must be designed to guarantee them to maintain its integrity in court. This issue is essential for digital evidence’s admissibility and probative value. This work has built and validated a real prototype to manage the CoC process of any digital evidence. Our technological solution follows a process model that separates the evidence registry and any evidence itself for scalability purposes. It includes the development of an open-source smart contract under Quorum, a version of Ethereum oriented to private business environments. The significant findings of our analysis have been: (1) Blockchain networks can become a solution, where integrity, privacy and traceability must be guaranteed between untrustworthy parties; and (2) the necessity of promoting the standardization of CoC smart contracts with a secure, simple process logic. Consequently, these contracts should be deployed in consortium environments, where reliable, independent third parties validate the transactions without having to know their content.

[1]  R. Zota,et al.  The Need for Cybersecurity in Industrial Revolution and Smart Cities , 2022, Sensors.

[2]  T. Górski The k + 1 Symmetric Test Pattern for Smart Contracts , 2022, Symmetry.

[3]  Yang Feng,et al.  Smart Contract Development: Challenges and Opportunities , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[4]  Venkata Praveen Krishna Anne,et al.  Storing and Securing the Digital Evidence in the Process of Digital Forensics through Blockchain Technology , 2021, DSMLAI.

[5]  Mauro Conti,et al.  LEChain: A blockchain-based lawful evidence management scheme for digital forensics , 2021, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[6]  Monia Lusetti,et al.  A blockchain based solution for the custody of digital files in forensic medicine , 2020, Digit. Investig..

[7]  Z. Allam,et al.  Reducing transaction costs of tradable permit schemes using Blockchain smart contracts , 2020, Growth and Change.

[8]  Hong-Ning Dai,et al.  An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[9]  Yanjiao Chen,et al.  CReam: A Smart Contract Enabled Collusion-Resistant e-Auction , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[10]  Roohie Naaz Mir,et al.  Forensic-chain: Blockchain based digital forensics chain of custody with PoC in Hyperledger Composer , 2019, Digit. Investig..

[11]  Robert V. Clint DLT/Blockchain as a Building Block for Enterprise Transformation , 2019, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[12]  Roohie Naaz Mir,et al.  Forensic-chain: Ethereum blockchain based digital forensics chain of custody , 2017 .

[13]  Peng Jiang,et al.  A Survey on the Security of Blockchain Systems , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[14]  Blockchain and Applications, 4th International Congress , 2023, BLOCKCHAIN.

[15]  Satpal Singh Kushwaha,et al.  Ethereum Smart Contract Analysis Tools: A Systematic Review , 2022, IEEE Access.

[16]  M. Badra,et al.  Analysis of Blockchain Solutions for E-Voting: A Systematic Literature Review , 2022, IEEE Access.

[17]  Escola Politécnica,et al.  Improving Chain of Custody in Forensic Investigation of Electronic Digital Systems , 2011 .

[18]  David W. J. Stringer-Calvert,et al.  Digital Evidence , 2002, Commun. ACM.