How Much Do Adolescents Cybergossip? Scale Development and Validation in Spain and Colombia

Cybergossip is the act of two or more people making evaluative comments via digital devices about somebody who is not present. This cyberbehavior affects the social group in which it occurs and can either promote or hinder peer relationships. Scientific studies that assess the nature of this emerging and interactive behavior in the virtual world are limited. Some research on traditional gossip has identified it as an inherent and defining element of indirect relational aggression. This paper adopts and argues for a wider definition of gossip that includes positive comments and motivations. This work also suggests that cybergossip has to be measured independently from traditional gossip due to key differences when it occurs through ICT. This paper presents the Colombian and Spanish validation of the Cybergossip Questionnaire for Adolescents (CGQ-A), involving 3,747 high school students (M = 13.98 years old, SD = 1.69; 48.5% male), of which 1,931 were Colombian and 1,816 were Spanish. Test models derived from item response theory, confirmatory factor analysis, content validation, and multi-group analysis were run on the full sample and subsamples for each country and both genders. The obtained optimal fit and psychometric properties confirm the robustness and suitability of a one-dimensional structure for the cybergossip instrument. The multi-group analysis shows that the cybergossip construct is understood similarly in both countries and between girls and boys. The composite reliability ratifies convergent and divergent validity of the scale. Descriptive results show that Colombian adolescents gossip less than their Spanish counterparts and that boys and girls use cybergossip to the same extent. As a conclusion, this study confirmes the relationship between cybergossip and cyberbullying, but it also supports a focus on positive cybergossip in psychoeducational interventions to build positive virtual relationships and prevent risky cyberbehaviors.

[1]  Vassilis Barkoukis,et al.  Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Myint Swe Khine,et al.  Early adolescents' use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for social communication in 20 countries: Examining the roles of ICT-related behavioral and motivational characteristics , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  K. Lagerspetz,et al.  Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight? Developmental Trends in Regard to Direct and Indirect Aggression , 1992 .

[4]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Reputation management: Why and how gossip enhances generosity , 2016 .

[5]  Peter Salovey,et al.  A Social Comparison Account of Gossip , 2004 .

[6]  Pere J. Ferrando,et al.  FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[7]  Albert Satorra,et al.  A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis , 1999 .

[8]  Gonzalo Musitu,et al.  Adolescentes colombianos y españoles: diferencias, similitudes y relaciones entre la socialización familiar, la autoestima y los valores , 2000 .

[9]  Bianca Beersma,et al.  How the Grapevine Keeps You in Line , 2011 .

[10]  Dimiter M. Dimitrov,et al.  Testing for Factorial Invariance in the Context of Construct Validation , 2010 .

[11]  R. Ortega-Ruiz,et al.  Cyberbullying: Social Competence, Motivation and Peer Relationships , 2016 .

[12]  Eric K. Foster.  Research on Gossip: Taxonomy, Methods, and Future Directions , 2004 .

[13]  J. Levin,et al.  Gossip: The Inside Scoop , 1987 .

[14]  D. Merten.  The Meaning of Meanness: Popularity, Competition, and Conflict among Junior High School Girls. , 1997 .

[15]  Robb Willer,et al.  Gossip and Ostracism Promote Cooperation in Groups , 2014, Psychological science.

[16]  Charlotte J. S. De Backer,et al.  Virtual gossip: How gossip regulates moral life in virtual worlds , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Andreas Ritter,et al.  Structural Equations With Latent Variables , 2016 .

[18]  Douglas J. Brown,et al.  Moving Beyond Assumptions of Deviance: The Reconceptualization and Measurement of Workplace Gossip , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  L. Magnani,et al.  A philosophical and evolutionary approach to cyber-bullying: social networks and the disruption of sub-moralities , 2013, Ethics and Information Technology.

[20]  Mathangi Subramanian.  Gossip, drama, and technology: how South Asian American young women negotiate gender on and offline , 2013 .

[21]  S. Coyne,et al.  An Integrated Review of Indirect, Relational, and Social Aggression , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[22]  Bianca Beersma,et al.  Why people gossip: An empirical analysis of social motives, antecedents, and consequences , 2012 .

[23]  Travis J. Grosser,et al.  A Social Network Analysis of Positive and Negative Gossip in Organizational Life , 2010 .

[24]  J. Parker,et al.  Developmental and Gender Differences in Preadolescents' Judgments of the Veracity of Gossip , 2002 .

[25]  Rosario Ortega-Ruiz,et al.  Validation of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire for Colombian Adolescents , 2017, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Fred B. Bryant,et al.  Principles and Practice of Scaled Difference Chi-Square Testing , 2012 .

[27]  Robert S. Tokunaga,et al.  Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  David Adebayo Oluwole.  Spirituality, Gender and Age Factors in Cybergossip Among Nigerian Adolescents , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[29]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  The effects of social- and self-motives on the intentions to share positive and negative word of mouth , 2013 .

[30]  D. G. Perry,et al.  Gender and Adolescent Development. , 2011 .

[31]  Rebecca Birch Stirling.  Some Psychological Mechanisms Operative in Gossip , 1956 .

[32]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[33]  Bruno Apolloni,et al.  Learning by Gossip: A Principled Information Exchange Model in Social Networks , 2013, Cognitive Computation.

[34]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Preschoolers affect others' reputations through prosocial gossip. , 2016, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[35]  J. C. Núñez,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Cyber-aggression Questionnaire for Adolescents (CYBA) , 2016 .

[36]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic , 2008, Psychometrika.

[37]  Paula Elosua Oliden,et al.  Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada , 2008 .

[38]  M. Putallaz,et al.  Girl Talk: Gossip, Friendship, and Sociometric Status , 2007 .

[39]  Romin W. Tafarodi,et al.  Individualism-Collectivism and Global Self-Esteem , 1996 .

[40]  M. Gluckman,et al.  Papers in Honor of Melville J. Herskovits: Gossip and Scandal , 1963, Current Anthropology.

[41]  Eiji Muraki,et al.  Fitting a Polytomous Item Response Model to Likert-Type Data , 1990 .

[42]  D. Watson.  Gender Differences in Gossip and Friendship , 2012 .

[43]  E. Romera,et al.  Cyberbullying: competencia social, motivación y relaciones entre iguales , 2016 .

[44]  Christine E. DeMars,et al.  Item Response Theory , 2010, Assessing Measurement Invariance for Applied Research.

[45]  Donna Eder,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF GOSSIP: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ON COLLECTIVE EXPRESSION AMONG ADOLESCENTS* , 1991 .

[46]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Tell Me the Gossip , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[47]  E. Romera,et al.  El cibercotilleo y el ciberacoso en la enseñanza primaria , 2017 .

[48]  Francesca Giardini,et al.  Deterrence and transmission as mechanisms ensuring reliability of gossip , 2011, Cognitive Processing.

[49]  Jordan A. Litman,et al.  Individual differences in attitudes towards gossip , 2005 .

[50]  D. Watson.  Gossip and the Self , 2011 .

[51]  Y. Kashima,et al.  Bad habit or social good? How perceptions of gossiper morality are related to gossip content , 2015 .

[52]  Rick Delbridge,et al.  News From Behind My Hand: Gossip in Organizations , 1993 .

[53]  Scott Miller,et al.  Knowing when not to use the Internet: Shyness and adolescents' on-line and off-line interactions with friends , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[54]  Mauricio Herrera-López,et al.  Multidimensional Social Competence, Motivation, and Cyberbullying: A Cultural Approach With Colombian and Spanish Adolescents , 2017 .

[55]  Britta Renner,et al.  Social Curiosity and Gossip: Related but Different Drives of Social Functioning , 2013, PloS one.

[56]  O. Nevo,et al.  The Development of the Tendency to Gossip Questionnaire: Construct and Concurrent Validation for a Sample of Israeli College Students , 1993 .

[57]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Human conversational behavior , 1997, Human nature.

[58]  J. Archer.  Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2004 .

[59]  F. Holgado-Tello,et al.  Construct Validity of Likert Scales through Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Simulation Study Comparing Different Methods of Estimation Based on Pearson and Polychoric Correlations , 2013 .

[60]  R. Paine.  What is Gossip About? An Alternative Hypothesis , 1967 .

[61]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques , 1998 .

[62]  J. Maquet.  Papers in Honor of Melville J. Herskovits Objectivity in Anthropology , 1964, Current Anthropology.

[63]  Rosario Ortega-Ruiz,et al.  Evaluar el "bullying" y el "cyberbullying" validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q , 2016 .

[64]  R. Cairns,et al.  The Development of Aggressive Behaviors Among Girls: Measurement Issues, Social Functions, and Differential Trajectories. , 2005 .

[65]  A. Buunk,et al.  Age differences in women's tendency to gossip are mediated by their mate value , 2012 .

[66]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  Gossip as Cultural Learning , 2004 .

[67]  S. Coyne,et al.  We're not friends anymore! unless... : The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational, and social aggression , 2006 .

[68]  Miriam Sang-Ah Park,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Examination of SNS Usage Intensity and Managing Interpersonal Relationships Online: The Role of Culture and the Autonomous-Related Self-Construal , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[69]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[70]  F. T. McAndrew.  The “sword of a woman”: Gossip and female aggression , 2014 .

[71]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Gossip in Evolutionary Perspective , 2004 .

[72]  R. Ortega-Ruiz,et al.  Cybergossip and cyberbullying during primary school years , 2017 .

[73]  Todd D Little,et al.  Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. , 2008, Child development.