Multivariable control and online state estimation of an FCC unit

The purpose of this paper is to realize multivariable control , tuning and online state estimation of some parameters of the FCC unit . We implemented two control structures with the manipulated variables being the air inlet flow rate in the regenerator, the regenerated catalyst flow rate and the feed flow rate and, the controlled variable being the temperatures in the riser and in the densed bed of the regenerator. A novel four transfer function is built and used for controllability studies. Hard constraints are imposed with respect to the manipulated variables. Simulation results show that the configuration made of two inputs and two outputs is more easy to tune for control purposes. Althought there are important dynamic interactions between the components of the FCC and important nonlinearities, linear model predictive control is able to maintain a smooth multivariable control of the plant, while taking into account the different constraints. Tuning strategy is implemented to improve the tracking of the set point. Online state estimation is carried out with the use of the extended Kalman filter. The estimation gives results that can be used for monitoring purposes even in the presence of model mismatch.

[1]  Nuno M.C. Oliveira,et al.  Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Process Modeling, Simulation, and Control , 2012 .

[2]  F. R. Groves,et al.  Mathematical Model of the Fluidized Bed Catalytic Cracking Plant , 1985 .

[3]  A. Arbel,et al.  Dynamics and Control of Fluidized Catalytic Crackers. 3. Designing the Control System: Choice of Manipulated and Measured Variables for Partial Control , 1996 .

[4]  A. Arbel,et al.  Dynamic and control of fluidized catalytic crackers. 1: Modeling of the current generation of FCC`s , 1995 .

[5]  Dan Simon,et al.  Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H∞, and Nonlinear Approaches , 2006 .

[6]  P. Indumathi,et al.  Design of Controllers for a Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Process , 2010 .

[7]  E. Bristol On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control , 1966 .

[8]  Dag Ljungquist,et al.  State-space predictive control , 1992 .

[9]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model predictive control: Theory and practice - A survey , 1989, Autom..

[10]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Procedure for regulatory control structure selection with application to the FCC process , 1993 .

[11]  James B. Rawlings,et al.  Critical Evaluation of Extended Kalman Filtering and Moving-Horizon Estimation , 2005 .

[12]  J. Richalet,et al.  Model predictive heuristic control: Applications to industrial processes , 1978, Autom..

[13]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Model predictive control: past, present and future , 1999 .

[14]  Marko Bacic,et al.  Model predictive control , 2003 .

[15]  Carlos E. Garcia,et al.  QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING SOLUTION OF DYNAMIC MATRIX CONTROL (QDMC) , 1986 .

[16]  Jean-Pierre Corriou,et al.  Model predictive control of a fluid catalytic cracking unit , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Process Control (PC).

[17]  Jean-Pierre Corriou Commande des Procédés , 2012 .

[18]  C. R. Cutler,et al.  Dynamic matrix control¿A computer control algorithm , 1979 .