Planning for the unplanned: an international review of current approaches to service disruption management of railways

This research paper explores the manner in which passenger rail transit organisations plan for and manage unplanned service disruptions through an international survey of practices. This included semi-structured interviews of those staff responsible for service disruption management within 48 international passenger rail transit agencies. Results suggest that only 11% of agencies had parallel transit systems which can be used for riders on disrupted services. Most of these were in inner urban contexts. Track intrusions/ medical emergencies, weather extremes, track and rolling stock failures were common causes of unplanned disruptions. Bus bridging was the most common response to line blockages whilst transfer of passengers to the next train was the most common approach to individual train rolling stock failures. Track crossovers were widely seen as critical to managing responses to disruptions, however, a small minority in mostly very cold and freezing climates also saw crossovers as a cause of unplanned failures. Most agencies used available spare buses to source bus bridging vehicles, however, just over 40% actively retracted buses from existing scheduled bus services. It is rare for agencies to have a strategic reserve of buses for bus bridging purposes. The paper discusses the implications of the study findings for future research and practice.

[1]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  A model for analyzing metro station platform conditions following a service disruption , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Sophie Boyd Public transport-1 , 2013 .

[3]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  Evaluating passenger robustness in a rail transit network , 2012 .

[4]  Ryuji Tsuchiya,et al.  Route-Choice Support System for Passengers in the Face of Unexpected Disturbance of Train Operations , 2006 .

[5]  Jens Clausen Disruption Management in Passenger Transportation - from Air to Tracks , 2007 .

[6]  Daniel Potthoff,et al.  Disruption Management in Passenger Railway Transportation , 2007, Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization.

[7]  Anthony Chalcraft Modern Railways Dictionary of Railway Industry Terms , 2006 .

[8]  N. Denzin The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1970 .

[9]  R. Green,et al.  The research process. , 1978, The Australasian nurses journal.

[10]  J. Adamson Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (eds). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003, pp.768, £77.00 ISBN: 0-7619-2073-0. , 2004 .

[11]  M P Maier,et al.  CRITICAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES , 1998 .

[12]  Jan-Dirk Schmöcker,et al.  Metro service delay recovery : Comparison of strategies and constraints across systems , 2005 .

[13]  Jerry B. Schneider,et al.  COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN AS APPLIED TO TRANSIT SYSTEM EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLANNING , 1984 .

[14]  Christina Goulding Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers , 2002 .

[15]  Vukan R Vuchic,et al.  Urban Transit : Operations, Planning and Economics , 2005 .

[16]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  The bus bridging problem in metro operations: conceptual framework, models and algorithms , 2009, Public Transp..

[17]  Beatrice Gralton,et al.  Washington DC - USA , 2008 .

[18]  Allan Larsen,et al.  Disruption management in the airline industry - Concepts, models and methods , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  장승엽,et al.  Modern Railway Track, 2nd Edition , 2012 .

[20]  M. Meyer,et al.  Contingency Planning for Response to Urban Transportation System Disruptions , 1982 .

[21]  J. Morse Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction , 1996 .

[22]  Annabelle Boyd,et al.  The public transportation system security and emergency preparedness planning guide , 2003 .