Unfinished Agenda or Overtaken by Events? Applying Aid- and Development-Effectiveness Principles to Capacity Development Support

This paper analyses to what extent the aid and development effectiveness agenda has been applied in the area of capacity development support, with a specific focus on the use of developing country systems. The paper is based on a literature review and a limited number of semi-structured interviews, as well as a review of available research evidence on capacity development support practices in Mozambique, Nepal, Rwanda and Vietnam. Three main conclusions are drawn from this paper. First of all, available research confirms that aid and development effectiveness achievements in the area of capacity development have been slow and disappointing, owing to reform-resistance of key stakeholders involved. Secondly, considerable potential remains to strengthen the effectiveness of capacity development support by further adapting approaches to design, deliver and evaluate interventions in reference to key aid and development effectiveness principles. Third, a lack of disaggregation of statistics and low investments in evaluation inhibits learning and accountability, and ultimately the improvement of capacity development results.

[1]  E. Pavignani,et al.  Pooling of Technical Assistance in Mozambique: Innovative Practices and Challenges , 2002 .

[2]  Richard Manning,et al.  Seven Problems of Effectiveness and How to Tackle Them , 2012 .

[3]  Stephen F. Knack,et al.  Aid Tying and Donor Fragmentation , 2012 .

[4]  Frank Vollmer.  Mozambique's Economic Transformation: Are Efforts to Streamline the Fragmented Aid Landscape Undermined for Good? , 2013 .

[5]  A. Acharya,et al.  Aid Effectiveness in the Health Sector , 2012 .

[6]  M. Moore,et al.  An Upside Down View of Governance , 2010 .

[7]  D. Brinkerhoff.  Organisational legitimacy, capacity and capacity development , 2013 .

[8]  Jörg Faust,et al.  German aid allocation and partner country selection: development-orientation, self-interests and path dependency , 2012 .

[9]  Merilee S. Grindle,et al.  Good Enough Governance Revisited , 2007 .

[10]  N. Keijzer.  Who’s the Boss? Strengthening the effectiveness of capacity-development support , 2013 .

[11]  Dirk Messner,et al.  Organizational challenges for an effective aid architecture : traditional deficits, the Paris Agenda and beyond , 2007 .

[12]  Bodo Ellmers,et al.  How to spend it Smart procurement for more effective aid , 2011 .

[13]  C. Pretorius,et al.  Supporting Capacity Development in PFM - A Practitioner's Guide , 2011 .

[14]  D. Truman.  The Domestic Politics of Foreign Aid , 1962 .

[15]  Matthew Morris,et al.  Beyond Paris: 11 Innovations in Aid Effectiveness , 2011 .

[16]  M. Reda,et al.  Which Factors Determine the Upgrading of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)? The Case of Egypt , 2013 .

[17]  R. Peltzer,et al.  Les modèles d’organisation des filières cotonnières et leur incidence sur la productivité et sur le revenu de l’agriculteur , 2013 .

[18]  Robinson.  The African , 2020, The Works of Mary Robinson.

[19]  M. King,et al.  Localising aid: can using local actors strengthen them? , 2012 .

[20]  Marwan Haddad,et al.  Capacity Development in Practice , 2012 .

[21]  P. Hill,et al.  The aid effectiveness agenda: Bringing discipline to diversity in global health? , 2007 .

[22]  Jenny Pearson,et al.  Training and Beyond: Seeking Better Practices for Capacity Development , 2011 .

[23]  E. V. Waeyenberge.  Selectivity at Work: Country Policy and Institutional Assessments at the World Bank , 2009 .

[24]  Roberto Bissio,et al.  The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness , 2013 .

[25]  Ingvild Aagedal Skage,et al.  Hunting for Per Diem: The Uses and Abuses of Travel Compensation in Three Developing Countries , 2012 .

[26]  Oliver Johnson,et al.  Exploring the effectiveness of local content requirements in promoting solar PV manufacturing in India , 2013 .

[27]  D. Hay,et al.  Call for action. , 1971, Nursing mirror and midwives journal.

[28]  Alfredo Ortiz.  Capacity building in complex environments : seeking meaningful methodology for social change , 2013 .

[29]  J. Bossuyt,et al.  New Avenues for Technical Cooperation in Africa , 1995 .

[30]  R. Eyben,et al.  Emerging and Submerging Powers: Imagined Geographies in the New Development Partnership at the Busan Fourth High Level Forum , 2013 .

[31]  Caroline Reeg,et al.  Micro, small and medium enterprise upgrading in low- and middle-income countries : a literature review , 2013 .

[32]  Jim Woodhill,et al.  Capacities for Institutional Innovation: A Complexity Perspective , 2010 .

[33]  Stephen F. Knack.  Building or Bypassing Recipient Country Systems: Are Donors Defying the Paris Declaration? , 2013 .

[34]  Lindsay Whitfield.  How Countries Become Rich and Reduce Poverty: A Review of Heterodox Explanations of Economic Development , 2012 .

[35]  Andrew Rogerson.  Aid Harmonisation and Alignment: Bridging the Gaps between Reality and the Paris Reform Agenda , 2005 .

[36]  E. Berg.  Why Aren't Aid Organizations Better Learners? , 2000 .

[37]  Nathalie Holvoet,et al.  Paris Declaration country evaluations: how solid is the evidence? META-Evaluation of the Country Evaluations of the Phase II Paris Declaration Evaluation , 2012 .

[38]  J. Hanlon,et al.  Mozambique: Contested Sovereignty? The Dilemmas of Aid Dependence , 2009 .

[39]  P. Renzio.  Taking Stock : What do PEFA Assessments tell us about PFM systems across countries ? , 2009 .

[40]  G. Dijkstra.  The new aid paradigm: A case of policy incoherence , 2015 .

[41]  William Easterly.  The cartel of good intentions: The problem of bureaucracy in foreign aid , 2002 .

[42]  Timo Mahn,et al.  Country-Level Aid Coordination at the United Nations: Taking the Resident Coordinator System Forward , 2013 .

[43]  Vidyadhar Mallik.  Local and community governance for peace and development in Nepal , 2013 .

[44]  Stephen F. Knack.  When Do Donors Trust Recipient Country Systems? , 2012 .

[45]  Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development,et al.  Organisation for economic cooperation and development , 1998 .

[46]  É. Belgium.  Evaluation Methodology & Baseline Study of European Commission Technical Cooperation Support , 2012 .

[47]  Clara Brandi,et al.  Sustainability certification in the Indonesian palm oil sector: benefits and challenges for smallholders , 2013 .

[48]  Of institutions and butterflies: is isomorphism in developing countries necessarily a bad thing? , 2013 .

[49]  S. Kühl.  Capacity Development as the Model for Development Aid Organizations , 2009 .

[50]  R. Chambers.  Poverty unperceived: traps, biases and agenda , 2006 .

[51]  Burkina Faso.  Evaluation of Public Financial Management Reform , 2012 .

[52]  M. Godfrey,et al.  Technical assistance and capacity development in an aid-dependent economy : the experience of Cambodia , 2002 .

[53]  Bringing the invisible into perspective-Reference document for using the 5Cs framework to plan, monitor and evaluate capacity and results of capacity development processes , 2014 .

[54]  R. D. Lamb.  Measuring Absorptive Capacity (MAC). A new framework for estimating constraints. , 2013 .

[55]  A. Sindzingre.  Theoretical Criticisms and Policy Optimism : Assessing the Debates on Foreign Aid , 2012 .

[56]  J. Hall.  Reconsidering the Connection between Capacity and Governance , 2002 .

[57]  Erik Lundsgaarde.  Bureaucratic pluralism and the transformation of development cooperation , 2013 .