Absolute and Relative Cues for the Auditory Perception of Egocentric Distance

Three experiments were performed to examine the reverberation cue to egocentric auditory distance and to determine the extent to which such a cue could provide ‘absolute’, as contrasted with ‘relative’, information about distance. In experiment 1 independent groups of blindfolded observers (200 altogether) were presented with broadband noise from a speaker at one of five different distances (0·55 to 8 m) in a normal hard-walled room. Half of each group of observers were presented with the sound at 0 deg azimuth, followed (after a delay) by the identical sound at 90 deg azimuth. The order of presentation was reversed for the remaining observers. Perceived distance varied significantly as a function of the physical distance to the speaker, even for the first presentations. The change in the binaural information between the 0 deg and 90 deg presentations did not significantly modify the results. For both orientations, near distances were overestimated and far distances were underestimated. Experiments 2 and 3 were designed to evaluate how much prior auditory exposure to the laboratory environment was necessary. A 200 Hz square-wave signal was presented from one of three distances (1, 2, or 6 m) to observers who had either minimal room information or an exposure which included talking within the room. Perceived distance varied significantly with physical distance regardless of exposure condition.

[1]  R. Gnanadesikan,et al.  Nonparametric Trend Analysis. A Practical Guide for Research Workers , 1965 .

[2]  J Molino Perceiving the range of a sound source when the direction is known. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D. Mershon,et al.  Intensity and reverberation as factors in the auditory perception of egocentric distance , 1975 .

[4]  Comments on “Perception of the Range of a Sound Source of Unknown Strength” [H. R. Hirsch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43, 373–374 (1968)] , 1968 .

[5]  H R Hirsch Perception of the range of a sound source of unknown strength. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  D H Mershon,et al.  Perceived Loudness and Visually-Determined Auditory Distance , 1981, Perception.

[7]  Heinrich Hertz,et al.  On the differences between localization and lateralization. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  An indirect method of measuring perceived distance from familiar size , 1976 .

[9]  J. P. Maxfield,et al.  SOME PHYSICAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE ILLUSION IN SOUND MOTION PICTURES , 1931 .

[10]  P. Coleman An analysis of cues to auditory depth perception in free space. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  P. Coleman,et al.  Experiments in hearing , 1961 .

[12]  D. Mershon,et al.  Scalar perceptions of distance in simple binocular configurations. , 1977, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  Walter Lawrence Gulick,et al.  Hearing: Physiology and Psychophysics , 1971 .

[14]  Mark B. Gardner,et al.  Distance Estimation of 0° or Apparent 0°‐Oriented Speech Signals in Anechoic Space , 1969 .

[15]  R. Lambert Dynamic theory of sound-source localization. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B. Scharf,et al.  Dichotic summation of loudness. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  W C Gogel,et al.  The measurement of perceived size and distance. , 1968, Contributions to sensory physiology.

[18]  W. Thurlow,et al.  Subject orientation and judgment of distance of a sound source. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  P. Coleman Failure to Localize the Source Distance of an Unfamiliar Sound , 1962 .

[20]  E. Poulton Unwanted range effects from using within-subject experimental designs. , 1973 .

[21]  P D Coleman,et al.  Dual role of frequency spectrum in determination of auditory distance. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  W E Simpson,et al.  Head movement does not facilitate perception of the distance of a source of sound. , 1973, The American journal of psychology.