The Common Core Writing Standards: A Descriptive Study of Content and Alignment with a Sample of Former State Standards.

Standards-based reform efforts aim to increase student achievement through specification of academic content standards that alter what occurs in classrooms (Hamilton & Stecher, 2006; Stecher, Hamilton, & Gonzalez, 2003). Cohen (1995) argues that the ultimate goal of standards-based reforms is a positive impact on teaching in order to improve student learning by leveraging top-down support for these changes, primarily through the alignment of policies related to teacher professional development, assessment and accountability measures, and challenging content standards. Content standards provide the basis for coherence among all of the standards-based reform elements. These standards are designed to guide curriculum development and subsequent instruction, to help teachers set instructional priorities and goals, to provide clear expectations for student achievement at each grade, and to raise expectations for performance.There is evidence, though limited, that states' content standards have some influence on student outcomes via their impact on classroom instruction. For instance, the Consortium for Policy Research in Education, which conducted a longitudinal study in the late 1990s to examine schools' and districts' response to standards-based accountability policies, found that state and local entities with well-developed content standards and accountability systems provided a clear focus for improving student outcomes (Goertz, 2001; Massell, 2001). Other studies, mostly in the domains of math and science, have found that curriculum aligned with standards is related to improved student outcomes (Carroll, 1997; Isaacs, Carroll, & Bell, 2001; Reys, Reys, Lapan, Holliday, & Wasman, 2003). Additionally, in one study teachers who reported aligning their instruction with standards had students who demonstrated higher achievement (Stone & Lane, 2000).It follows that the variability of standards across states would be expected to explain some of the variance in teaching and learning across the nation (e.g., Duke, 2001; Dutro & Valencia, 2004; Spillane, 1998; Spillane & Jennings, 1997). The promulgation of a single set of academic content standards for the nation through the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) has significant implications for teacher preparation and professional development, curriculum materials, and classroom pedagogy. The CCSS for English language arts have been formally adopted and implemented by 44 states and the District of Columbia; Alaska, Indiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, and Virginia have elected to not adopt the new standards.The CCSS need to be thoroughly evaluated for their content for three reasons. First, standards can be expected to effectively guide curriculum and instruction (and thus impact student achievement) only if they are wellarticulated, comprehensive, and based on theoretical models of learning specific to the content being taught. Second, if the CCSS and existing state standards are not well aligned, states may be forced to adopt different curricular materials, adjust when specific aspects of content are addressed, rebalance content foci within grades, and make substantial changes to their professional development programs. Third, like most policy tools, the CCSS are dynamic rather than static and will undergo future revision based on content analyses and input from the field as the standards are enacted and student performance indices are tracked to insure that the intent of the developers to establish a set of rigorous and research-based standards that will prepare students for college and the workplace is fully realized.Using varied means, a growing number of stakeholders have evaluated the CCSS. For instance, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute (Carmichael, Martino, Porter-Magee, & Wilson, 2010) has noted that (a) a number of the CCSS are repetitive across grades and do not specify a clearly delineated progression of rigor and (b) some core standards are too vague to guide instruction (e. …

[1]  Grace Taylor,et al.  A Survey of Teachers' Perspectives on High-Stakes Testing in Colorado: What Gets Taught, What Gets Lost , 2002 .

[2]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us , 2000 .

[3]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  Common Core Standards , 2011 .

[4]  Svjetlana Curcic,et al.  Writing Into the 21st Century , 2006 .

[5]  S. Graham,et al.  It can be taught, but it does not develop naturally: Myths and realities in writing instruction. , 1997 .

[6]  G. A. Troia,et al.  A Year in the Writing Workshop , 2011, The Elementary School Journal.

[7]  Sheila Byrd Carmichael,et al.  The State of State Standards--and the Common Core--in 2010. , 2010 .

[8]  Kimberly A Wolbers,et al.  Motivation Research in Writing: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations , 2012 .

[9]  M. Daane,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Writing, 2002. , 2003 .

[10]  Gavin W. Fulmer,et al.  Refining Methods for Estimating Critical Values for an Alignment Index , 2013 .

[11]  R. Beach,et al.  Issues in Analyzing Alignment of Language Arts Common Core Standards With State Standards , 2011 .

[12]  David D. Preiss,et al.  Writing : A Mosaic of New Perspectives , 2012 .

[13]  D. Cohen.  What Standards for National Standards. , 1995 .

[14]  S. Graham,et al.  Primary Grade Writing Instruction: A National Survey. , 2008 .

[15]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Handbook of Writing Research , 2005 .

[16]  Tessa Kaganoff,et al.  The Effects of Standards-Based Assessment on Classroom Practices: Results of the 1996-97 RAND Survey of Kentucky Teachers of Mathematics and Writing , 1998 .

[17]  Sharon James McGee,et al.  Writing in High School/Writing in College: Research Trends and Future Directions , 2010, College Composition & Communication.

[18]  Sharlene A. Kiuhara,et al.  Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey , 2009 .

[19]  Brian M. Stecher,et al.  The Effects of the Washington State Education Reform on Schools and Classrooms. CSE Technical Report. , 2000 .

[20]  Sarah J. McCarthey,et al.  The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Teachers' Writing Instruction , 2008 .

[21]  William M. Carroll.  Results of Third-Grade Students in a Reform Curriculum on the Illinois State Mathematics Test. , 1997 .

[22]  William H. Schmidt,et al.  A Coherent Curriculum: The Case of Mathematics. , 2002 .

[23]  Josephine Brady,et al.  The Sage handbook of writing development , 2010 .

[24]  Karen K. Wixson,et al.  The Alignment of State Standards and Assessments in Elementary Reading. CIERA Report. , 2002 .

[25]  Robert E. Reys,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Standards-Based Middle Grades Mathematics Curriculum Materials on Student Achievement. , 2003 .

[26]  R. Abbott,et al.  Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. , 1997 .

[27]  Bonnie Albertson,et al.  Organization and Development Features of Grade 8 and Grade 10 Writers: A Descriptive Study of Delaware Student Testing Program (DSTP) Essays. , 2007 .

[28]  George Hillocks,et al.  What Works in Teaching Composition: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Treatment Studies , 1984, American Journal of Education.

[29]  Paul Prior.  A Sociocultural Theory of Writing. , 2005 .

[30]  L. Faigley,et al.  Coherence, Cohesion, and Writing Quality , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[31]  Gabriella C. Gonzalez,et al.  Working Smarter to Leave No Child Behind , 2003 .

[32]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  The State of Writing Instruction in America's Schools: What Existing Data Tell Us. , 2006 .

[33]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Aligned Instructional Policy and Ambitious Pedagogy: Exploring Instructional Reform from the Classroom Perspective , 1997, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[34]  Carl W. Swartz,et al.  Goals and Progress Feedback: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Writing Achievement , 1993 .

[35]  Sheila W. Valencia,et al.  The Relation Between State and District Literacy Standards: Issues of Alignment, Influence, and Utility. A Research Report. Document R-04-2. , 2004 .

[36]  Clement A. Stone,et al.  Consequences of a State Accountability Program: Examining Relationships Between School Performance Gains and Teacher, Student, and School Variables , 2003 .

[37]  S. Graham,et al.  Common Core State Standards, Writing, and Students with LD: Recommendations , 2013 .

[38]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  How Well Aligned Are State Assessments of Student Achievement With State Content Standards? , 2011 .

[39]  D. McCutchen.  A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition , 1996 .

[40]  Tom Loveless.  HOW WELL ARE AMERICAN STUDENTS , 2001 .

[41]  James P. Spillane.  State Policy and the Non-Monolithic Nature of the Local School District: Organizational and Professional Considerations , 1998 .

[42]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  Measuring the Content of Instruction: Uses in Research and Practice , 2002 .

[43]  George Hillocks,et al.  The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning , 2002 .

[44]  S. Graham,et al.  A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. , 2007 .

[45]  Henry A. Giroux.  Pedagogy And The Politics Of Hope: Theory, Culture, And Schooling: A Critical Reader , 1997 .

[46]  Michael Hebert,et al.  Informing writing: The benefits of formative assessment. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act report , 2011 .

[47]  Virginia W. Berninger,et al.  Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. , 2003 .

[48]  Sharlene A. Kiuhara,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Students in the Elementary Grades. , 2012 .

[49]  Norman L. Webb,et al.  Alignment of an Alternate Assessment with State Academic Standards , 2005 .

[50]  S. Graham,et al.  Teaching Writing to Elementary Students in Grades 4–6: A National Survey , 2010, The Elementary School Journal.

[51]  B. Foorman,et al.  How Quality of Writing Instruction Impacts High-risk Fourth Graders’ Writing , 2006 .

[52]  Frank Pajares,et al.  SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS, MOTIVATION, AND ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 2003 .