Can We Still Use PEAQ? A Performance Analysis of the ITU Standard for the Objective Assessment of Perceived Audio Quality

The Perceptual Evaluation of Audio Quality (PEAQ) method as described in the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) recommendation ITU-R BS.1387 has been widely used for computationally estimating the quality of perceptually coded audio signals without the need for extensive subjective listening tests. However, many reports have highlighted clear limitations of the scheme after the end of its standardization, particularly involving signals coded with newer technologies such as bandwidth extension or parametric multi-channel coding. Until now, no other method for measuring the quality of both speech and audio signals has been standardized by the ITU. Therefore, a further investigation of the causes for these limitations would be beneficial to a possible update of said scheme. Our experimental results indicate that the performance of PEAQ's model of disturbance loudness is still as good as (and sometimes superior to) other state-of-the-art objective measures, albeit with varying performance depending on the type of degraded signal content (i.e. speech or music). This finding evidences the need for an improved cognitive model. In addition, results indicate that an updated mapping of Model Output Values (MOVs) to PEAQ's Distortion Index (DI) based on newer training data can greatly improve performance. Finally, some suggestions for the improvement of PEAQ are provided based on the reported results and comparison to other systems.

[1]  Thomas Sporer,et al.  PEAQ - The ITU Standard for Objective Measurement of Perceived Audio Quality , 2000 .

[2]  Krzysztof,et al.  INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION FOR STANDARDISATION , 2006 .

[3]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  PEMO-Q—A New Method for Objective Audio Quality Assessment Using a Model of Auditory Perception , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[4]  Emmanuel Vincent,et al.  Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Audio Source Separation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[5]  Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems , 2015 .

[6]  Andrew Hines,et al.  Objective Assessment of Perceptual Audio Quality Using ViSQOLAudio , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[7]  Peter Pocta,et al.  Subjective and Objective Assessment of Perceived Audio Quality of Current Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems and Web-Casting Applications , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[8]  Sascha Dick,et al.  Comparing the Effect of Audio Coding Artifacts on Objective Quality Measures and on Subjective Ratings , 2018 .

[9]  John G. Beerends,et al.  A Perceptual Audio Quality Measure Based on a Psychoacoustic Sound Representation , 1992 .

[10]  Schuyler Quackenbush,et al.  The ISO/MPEG Unified Speech and Audio Coding Standard—Consistent High Quality for All Content Types and at All Bit Rates , 2013 .

[11]  Sebastian Schneider,et al.  Standardization of PEAQ-MC: Extension of ITU-R BS.1387-1 to Multichannel Audio , 2010 .

[12]  RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BS.1387-1 - Method for objective measurements of perceived audio quality , 2002 .

[13]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Method for the subjective assessment of intermedi-ate quality levels of coding systems , 2001 .