Application of social media in a regional design competition: a case study in the Netherlands

Many scholars argue for significant stakeholder involvement in landscape planning and design1 (for instance STEINITZ, 2012; BOOHER & INNES, 2002; CRAIG, 1998). Facilitating public engagement can be a challenging task, which involves the sharing of information, enabling citizens to form opinions, the exchange of opinions, and community building to create trust and acceptance (MACINTOSH, 2008). When applying traditional methods for participation – such as participation meetings and workshops – accessibility and inclusiveness of the process can be problematic due to boundaries in time and space. Web-based methods offer participants the opportunity to engage without being physically present, at a time and place that suits them, and anonymously if necessary (BRABHAM, 2009; MACINTOSH, 2008; VAN LAMMEREN ET AL., 2007). Moreover, new technologies allow interactions with the public at relatively low cost and high levels of efficiency (MACINTOSH, 2008; KAPLAN & HAENLEIN, 2009; BRABHAM, 2009, KINGSTON ET AL., 2000). Several publications explore the potential use of web based technologies to enhance public involvement in spatial planning and design, for instance in the form of online visualization tools (VERVOORT ET AL, 2010; SHEN, 2009), serious games (POPLIN, 2012), so-called argumentation maps (RINNER ET AL., 2008) and crowdsourcing (JEANSSON ET AL., 2012, LIGTENBERG & VAN LAMMEREN, 2012; HAMMON & HIPPNER, 2012; BRABHAM, 2009); all advocating further development of such technologies to enable online participation and collaboration in planning and design. The extent to which existing platforms, such as social networking sites of MySpace and Facebook, can support participation and collaboration is rather underestimated in planning and design literature and practice. As we are witnessing increased use of social media in society – and the impact of social media on society – their use as a means to enable citizen participation and collaboration needs to be explored. In this paper, we analyse the role of social media in the Eo Wijers regional design competition in the Netherlands, which provides examples of the use of social media from the perspective of integrated design/ planning teams. We studied A) which social media the teams proposed and applied in the competition entries and B) the level of interaction with the public that the teams aimed for.

[1]  J. M. de Jonge,et al.  Landscape architecture between politics and science: an integrative perspective on landscape planning and design in the network society. , 2009 .

[2]  I.M.A.M. Propper,et al.  De aanpak van interactief beleid: elke situatie is anders , 1999 .

[3]  A. Macintosh The emergence of digital governance , 2008 .

[4]  R.J.A. van Lammeren,et al.  Sociale Media als bron voor ruimtelijke informatie , 2012 .

[5]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Stepping into futures : exploring the potential of interactive media for participatory scenarios on social-ecological systems , 2010 .

[6]  I. Turton,et al.  Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making , 2000 .

[7]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects , 2009 .

[8]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Network Power in Collaborative Planning , 2000 .

[9]  Charles H. Nilon Applied Urban Ecology , 1993 .

[10]  Leonie Sandercock,et al.  Out of the Closet: The Importance of Stories and Storytelling in Planning Practice , 2003 .

[11]  R.J.A. van Lammeren,et al.  Geo-visualisation, The e-interaction factor in spatial planning , 2007 .

[12]  James Lam Concepts and Processes , 2014 .

[13]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[14]  Maarit Kahila-Tani,et al.  Web-based Public Participation in Urban Planning Competitions , 2015 .

[15]  J. M. Jonge,et al.  Een kwart eeuw Eo Wijers-stichting : ontwerpprijsvraag als katalysator voor gebiedsontwikkeling , 2008 .

[16]  Hajo Hippner,et al.  Crowdsourcing , 2012, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[17]  Claus Rinner,et al.  The use of Web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[18]  Eric Jeansson,et al.  3D Online : Crowdsourcing for city planning , 2012 .

[19]  M. V. Hulst,et al.  Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning: , 2012 .

[20]  Matthew Potteiger,et al.  Landscape Narratives: Design Practices for Telling Stories , 1998 .

[21]  P. Healey Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[22]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[23]  William J. Craig,et al.  The Internet AIDS community participation in the planning process , 1998 .

[24]  Jean Hillier,et al.  Contemporary Movements in Planning Theory , 2008 .

[25]  Christina von Haaren,et al.  Integrating Science and Creativity for Landscape Planning and Design of Urban Areas , 2011 .

[26]  Alenka Poplin,et al.  Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games , 2012, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[27]  Sven Stremke,et al.  Integrated Visions (Part I): Methodological Framework for Long-term Regional Design , 2012 .

[28]  R. M. de Waal,et al.  Nieuwe energie voor de Veenkoloniën, op zoek naar regionale comfortzones; Plananalyse , 2012 .

[29]  Mitsuhiko Kawakami,et al.  An online visualization tool for Internet-based local townscape design , 2010, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[30]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[31]  Carl Steinitz,et al.  A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design , 2012 .

[32]  Dvora Yanow,et al.  Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes , 2011 .