Analysis of soil moisture patterns in forested and suburban catchments in Baltimore, Maryland, using high-resolution photogrammetric and LIDAR digital elevation datasets

Field observations of near-surface soil moisture, collected over several seasons in a watershed in suburban Maryland, are compared with values of the topographic soil moisture index generated using digital elevation models (DEMs) at a range of grid cell sizes from photogrammetric and light detection and ranging (LIDAR) data sources. A companion set of near-surface soil moisture observations, DEMs and topographic index values are also presented for a nearby forested catchment. The degree to which topographic index values are an effective indicator of near-surface soil moisture conditions varies in the two environments. The urbanizing environment requires topographic index values from a DEM with a much finer grid cell resolution than the LIDAR data can provide, and the relationship is stronger in wetter conditions. In the forested environment, the DEM resolution required is considerably lower and adequately supported by the photogrammetric data, and the relationship is strong under all moisture conditions. These results provide some insights into the length scales of near-surface hydrological processes in the urbanizing environment, and the resolution of terrain data required to model those processes. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  A quasi-dynamic wetness index for characterizing the spatial distribution of zones of surface saturation and , 1994 .

[2]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations , 1994 .

[3]  K. Beven,et al.  Sensitivity to space and time resolution of a hydrological model using digital elevation data. , 1995 .

[4]  L. Nyberg Spatial variability of soil water content in the covered catchment at Gårdsjön, Sweden , 1996 .

[5]  Keith Beven,et al.  Testing the distributed water table predictions of TOPMODEL (allowing for uncertainty in model calibration): The death of TOPMODEL? , 2002 .

[6]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  Comparison of Single and Multiple Flow Direction Algorithms for Computing Topographic Parameters in TOPMODEL , 1995 .

[7]  D. Tarboton A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[8]  I. Iorgulescu,et al.  Validation of TOPMODEL on a small Swiss catchment , 1994 .

[9]  M. Hutchinson A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits , 1989 .

[10]  D. Wolock,et al.  Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography‐based watershed model , 1994 .

[11]  I. D. Moore,et al.  Topographic Effects on the Distribution of Surface Soil Water and the Location of Ephemeral Gullies , 1988 .

[12]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[13]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns: Local and nonlocal controls , 1997 .

[14]  K. Beven,et al.  The in(a/tan/β) index:how to calculate it and how to use it within the topmodel framework , 1995 .

[15]  Jaroslav Hofierka,et al.  Processing digital terrain models by regularized spline with tension: tuning interpolation parameters for different input datasets , 2002 .

[16]  S. Goetz,et al.  IKONOS imagery for resource management: Tree cover, impervious surfaces, and riparian buffer analyses in the mid-Atlantic region , 2003 .

[17]  Marco Franchini,et al.  Physical interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the TOPMODEL , 1996 .

[18]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Soil water prediction on the Konza Prairie by microwave remote sensing and topographic attributes , 1992 .

[19]  Garry R. Willgoose,et al.  On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology , 1999 .

[20]  L. Band,et al.  The effect of different terrain representations and resolution on simulated watershed processes , 1995 .

[21]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices , 1999 .

[22]  Keith Beven,et al.  TOPMODEL : a critique. , 1997 .

[23]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[24]  Keith Beven,et al.  Analytical compensation between DTM grid resolution and effective values of staurated hydraulic conductivity within the TOPMODEL framework , 1997 .

[25]  R. Grayson,et al.  A downward approach to identifying the structure and parameters of a process‐based model for a small experimental catchment , 2003 .

[26]  G. Mendicino,et al.  The information content theory for the estimation of the topographic index distribution used in TOPMODEL , 1997 .

[27]  T. Jackson,et al.  Ground‐based investigation of soil moisture variability within remote sensing footprints During the Southern Great Plains 1997 (SGP97) Hydrology Experiment , 1999 .