Use of “Tethering” for the Identification of a Small Molecule that Binds to a Dynamic Hot Spot on the Interleukin‐2 Surface

The modulation of protein±protein interactions by small organic molecules represents one of the most rewarding yet challenging topics of current research at the interface of organic chemistry and biochemistry. Since the biological function of most proteins depends on their interactions with other macromolecules, disruption or enhancement of these interactions by cell-permeable molecules provides a means of influencing protein function. Cell-permeable molecules that allow a given protein to be turned on or off with high temporal and spatial control are therefore desirable tools for the analysis of complex biological systems in basic research. However, the following difficulties need to be overcome: 1) protein±protein interfaces are significantly larger than the surface areas of small molecules, 2) many protein±protein interfaces lack obvious binding pockets for small molecules, and 3) mechanismbased or natural product-based lead structures rarely exist. A solution for the problem of size difference between small molecules and protein±protein interfaces was offered in 1995 by the group of J. Wells, who proposed the presence of TMhot spots∫ in protein±protein interfaces. Hot spots are subregions of protein±protein interfaces that contribute significantly to the overall free energy of binding between the proteins, and whose size is comparable to the surface area of drug-like molecules. Further research by Wells and other scientists recently provided additional evidence that the problem originating from the frequent absence of obvious binding pockets for small molecules in flat protein surfaces can be overcome. The articles by Wells, Braisted, and Oslob highlighted here point to an aspect of hot spots that encourages the initial screening of diverse chemical libraries: flexible protein surfaces. These articles describe the discovery of small-molecule inhibitors of the interactions between interleukin-2 (IL-2) and its receptor IL-2Ra, and elucidate the inhibitors' mechanisms of action. Compound 1, a micromolar inhibitor of the IL-2/IL-2Ra interaction, acts by binding to the IL2Ra-binding region of IL-2. This region of IL-2 had previously been defined by mutational studies, which analyzed the importance of individual amino acids for binding to IL-2Ra, and consists of a rigid and a flexible region. Efforts to optimize 1 by structure-based design and parallel synthesis led to novel lead structures 2 and 3 (Scheme 1), whose potency did not exceed the potency of the original inhibitor 1. X-ray analysis revealed that inhibitor 3 binds to the hot spot of the IL-2/IL-2Ra interaction in a similar manner to the parent compound 1. In order to identify more active inhibitors, a fragment-assembly method referred to as TMtethering∫ was applied. Tethering can identify low-affinity fragments that bind to a specific site of a protein. It involves generating protein mutants in which cysteine mutations are introduced at the perimeter of the protein region of interest. Subsequently, the mutant proteins are probed with disulfide-containing chemical libraries under conditions that facilitate thiol±disulfide exchange, and molecules that bind to the site near the cysteine mutation (even if the affinity is low) are captured by disulfide bonds. The identity of the small molecules covalently attached to the protein is then analyzed by mass spectrometry (Scheme 2).

[1]  G. Ju,et al.  Localization in human interleukin 2 of the binding site to the alpha chain (p55) of the interleukin 2 receptor. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Wolfgang Jahnke,et al.  Second-site NMR screening and linker design. , 2003, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Dustin J Maly,et al.  Combinatorial target-guided ligand assembly: identification of potent subtype-selective c-Src inhibitors. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Michelle R Arkin,et al.  Discovery of a potent small molecule IL-2 inhibitor through fragment assembly. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  T. Berg Modulation of protein-protein interactions with small organic molecules. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[7]  W. Sebald,et al.  Mutant proteins of human interleukin 2. Renaturation yield, proliferative activity and receptor binding. , 1989, European journal of biochemistry.

[8]  M. Randal,et al.  Potent small-molecule binding to a dynamic hot spot on IL-2. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  G. Powers,et al.  Identification of a Small Molecule Inhibitor of the IL-2/IL-2Rα Receptor Interaction Which Binds to IL-2 , 1997 .

[10]  Daniel A Erlanson,et al.  Identification of potent and selective small-molecule inhibitors of caspase-3 through the use of extended tethering and structure-based drug design. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  P. Hajduk,et al.  Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR , 1996, Science.

[12]  Frank Petersen,et al.  Small-molecule antagonists of the oncogenic Tcf/β-catenin protein complex , 2004 .

[13]  M. V. Regenmortel,et al.  Molecular recognition in the post-reductionist era. , 1999 .

[14]  Daniel A Erlanson,et al.  Discovery of a new phosphotyrosine mimetic for PTP1B using breakaway tethering. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  Michelle R. Arkin,et al.  Binding of small molecules to an adaptive protein–protein interface , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Sanders,et al.  Recent developments in dynamic combinatorial chemistry. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[17]  Olof Ramström,et al.  Drug discovery by dynamic combinatorial libraries , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[18]  Michelle R. Arkin,et al.  Discovery and characterization of cooperative ligand binding in the adaptive region of interleukin-2 , 2002 .

[19]  R. Stroud,et al.  Site-directed ligand discovery. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  I. Luque,et al.  Structural stability of binding sites: Consequences for binding affinity and allosteric effects , 2000, Proteins.

[21]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Definition and spatial location of mouse interleukin‐2 residues that interact with its heterotrimeric receptor. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[22]  Horst Kessler,et al.  NMR-based screening technologies. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[23]  Clemencia Pinilla,et al.  Small-molecule antagonists of apoptosis suppressor XIAP exhibit broad antitumor activity. , 2004, Cancer cell.

[24]  L. Vassilev,et al.  In Vivo Activation of the p53 Pathway by Small-Molecule Antagonists of MDM2 , 2004, Science.

[25]  W. Delano,et al.  In situ assembly of enzyme inhibitors using extended tethering , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[27]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1110/ps.21302 References , 2001 .

[28]  T. Berg Modulation von Protein‐Protein‐Wechselwirkungen mit niedermolekularen organischen Molekülen , 2003 .

[29]  T. Mayer,et al.  Chemical genetics: tailoring tools for cell biology. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[30]  Michelle R. Arkin,et al.  Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.