The encoding complexity of network coding

In the multicast network coding problem, a source s needs to deliver h packets to a set of k terminals over an underlying communication network G. The nodes of the multicast network can be broadly categorized into two groups. The first group includes encoding nodes, i.e., nodes that generate new packets by combining data received from two or more incoming links. The second group includes forwarding nodes that can only duplicate and forward the incoming packets. Encoding nodes are, in general, more expensive due to the need to equip them with encoding capabilities. In addition, encoding nodes incur delay and increase the overall complexity of the network. Accordingly, in this paper, we study the design of multicast coding networks with a limited number of encoding nodes. We prove that in a directed acyclic coding network, the number of encoding nodes required to achieve the capacity of the network is bounded by h/sup 3/k/sup 2/. Namely, we present (efficiently constructible) network codes that achieve capacity in which the total number of encoding nodes is independent of the size of the network and is bounded by h/sup 3/k/sup 2/. We show that the number of encoding nodes may depend both on h and k by presenting acyclic coding networks that require /spl Omega/(h/sup 2/k) encoding nodes. In the general case of coding networks with cycles, we show that the number of encoding nodes is limited by the size of the minimum feedback link set, i.e., the minimum number of links that must be removed from the network in order to eliminate cycles. We prove that the number of encoding nodes is bounded by (2B+1)h/sup 3/k/sup 2/, where B is the minimum size of a feedback link set. Finally, we observe that determining or even crudely approximating the minimum number of required encoding nodes is an /spl Nscr/P-hard problem.

[1]  Mohammad R. Salavatipour,et al.  Hardness and approximation results for packing steiner trees , 2005, Algorithmica.

[2]  Christina Fragouli,et al.  Network Coding as a Coloring Problem , 2004 .

[3]  R. Koetter,et al.  The benefits of coding over routing in a randomized setting , 2003, IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, 2003. Proceedings..

[4]  K. Menger Zur allgemeinen Kurventheorie , 1927 .

[5]  N. S. Barnett,et al.  Private communication , 1969 .

[6]  Muriel Médard,et al.  An algebraic approach to network coding , 2003, TNET.

[7]  Michael Langberg,et al.  The encoding complexity of network coding , 2005, ISIT.

[8]  Christina Fragouli,et al.  Information flow decomposition for network coding , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  Rudolf Ahlswede,et al.  Network information flow , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  K. Jain,et al.  A Unification of Menger ’ s and Edmonds ’ Graph Theorems and Ahlswede et al ’ s Network Coding Theorem , 2004 .

[11]  John E. Hopcroft,et al.  The Directed Subgraph Homeomorphism Problem , 1978, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[12]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[13]  Peter Sanders,et al.  Polynomial time algorithms for multicast network code construction , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  Dana Ron,et al.  Bounds on Linear Codes for Network Multicast , 2003, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..