The influence of matrix habitat on Aphthona flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patches

Variation in movement ability by insects among different non-habitat (matrix) types may have important implications for both metapopulation dynamics and weed biocontrol practices. We used a mark-recapture experiment to explore the effects of two different matrix habitats (grass vs shrub) on the ability of two species of Aphthona (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) flea beetle to immigrate to patches of the invasive weed, leafy spurge. Using generalized linear models, we compared effects of the matrix habitat types, species and sex on observed immigration probabilities. Our analyses demonstrated that one species (A. nigriscutis) had a much higher immigration probability when moving through a grass-dominated matrix than a shrub-dominated matrix whereas immigration probabilities for the second species (A. lacertosa) were similar in both matrix habitats but significantly lower overall than for A. nigriscutis. Furthermore, A. nigriscutis females were more likely to immigrate to spurge patches embedded in a grass matrix than in shrub, whereas the opposite occurred for males. Our results suggest that metapopulation dynamics may be strongly affected by the type(s) of matrix habitat present on a landscape. These effects also suggest that release strategies for weed biocontrol should be tailored according to the structure of the landscape into which releases are planned. In addition, even closely related species can have significantly different movement abilities which will also affect release strategies.

[1]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Structured Metapopulation Models , 1997 .

[2]  A. Thomas,et al.  The biology of Canadian weeds. 39. Euphorbia esula L. , 1980 .

[3]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[4]  P. J. Boer,et al.  Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers , 1968 .

[5]  R E McFadyen,et al.  Biological control of weeds. , 1998, Annual review of entomology.

[6]  P. Kareiva Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data , 1990 .

[7]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Experimental and Mathematical Analyses of Herbivore Movement: Quantifying the Influence of Plant Spacing and Quality on Foraging Discrimination , 1982 .

[8]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Ecological Processes That Affect Populations in Complex Landscapes , 1992 .

[9]  Robert Lee Schooley,et al.  Patchy Landscapes and Animal Movements: Do Beetles Percolate? , 1997 .

[10]  H. G. Andrewartha,et al.  The distribution and abundance of animals. , 1954 .

[11]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Finding and Losing Host Plants by Phyllotreta: Patch Size and Surrounding Habitat , 1985 .

[12]  M. Rees,et al.  Biological control of Scotch broom : modelling the determinants of abundance and the potential impact of introduced insect herbivores , 1997 .

[13]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY AND LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE , 1998 .

[14]  Andrew D. Taylor,et al.  Empirical Evidence for Metapopulation Dynamics , 1997 .

[15]  A. Desrochers,et al.  Winter Responses of Forest Birds to Habitat Corridors and Gaps , 1998 .

[16]  F. Grevstad,et al.  Quantifying the effects of distance and conspecifics on colonization: experiments and models using the loosestrife leaf beetle, Galerucella calmariensis , 1997, Oecologia.

[17]  I. Hanski Metapopulation dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[18]  P. McEvoy,et al.  BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PLANT INVADERS: REGIONAL PATTERNS, FIELD EXPERIMENTS, AND STRUCTURED POPULATION MODELS , 1999 .

[19]  N. Rees Establishment, Dispersal, and Influence of Ceutorhynchus litura on Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) in the Gallatin Valley of Montanal , 1990 .

[20]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Conservation of fragmented populations , 1994 .

[21]  A. Hastings,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics and Genetics , 1994 .

[22]  E. Matthysen,et al.  Dispersal distances of nuthatches, Sitta europaea, in a highly fragmented forest habitat , 1995 .

[23]  Uno Wennergren,et al.  Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes , 1995, Nature.

[24]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology , 1997 .

[25]  J. Wiens,et al.  HOW DOES HABITAT PATCH SIZE AFFECT ANIMAL MOVEMENT? AN EXPERIMENT WITH DARKLING BEETLES , 1999 .

[26]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization , 1996 .

[27]  I. Hanski A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[28]  S. L. Lima,et al.  SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .

[29]  Jason Pither,et al.  An Experimental Assessment of Landscape Connectivity , 1998 .

[30]  D. Schroeder,et al.  Biology, Ecology, and Host Specificity of EuropeanAphthonaspp. (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) Used as Biocontrol Agents for Leafy Spurge,Euphorbia esula(Euphorbiaceae), in North America , 1996 .

[31]  M. Holyoak,et al.  Persistence of an Extinction-Prone Predator-Prey Interaction Through Metapopulation Dynamics , 1996 .

[32]  G. A. Mulligan The biology of Canadian weeds , 1979 .

[33]  L. Kok,et al.  Establishment and Dispersal ofUrophora affinis(Diptera: Tephritidae) andMetzneria paucipunctella(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Southwestern Virginia , 1996 .

[34]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[35]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes : an experiment with Eleodes beetles in shortgrass prairie , 1992 .

[36]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[37]  Mark L. Taper,et al.  Migration within Metapopulations: The Impact upon Local Population Dynamics , 1997 .

[38]  Philip D. Taylor,et al.  Wing Morphology of a Forest Damselfly Is Related to Landscape Structure , 1995 .

[39]  Ian D. Jonsen,et al.  Fine-scale movement behaviors of calopterygid damselflies are influenced by landscape structure: an experimental manipulation , 2000 .

[40]  Alan R. Johnson,et al.  Diffusion in Fractcal Landscapes: Simulations and Experimental Studies of Tenebrionid Beetle Movements , 1992 .

[41]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimal release strategies for biological control agents: an application of stochastic dynamic programming to population management , 2000 .

[42]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Finding the Missing Link between Landscape Structure and Population Dynamics: A Spatially Explicit Perspective , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[43]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF SURVIVAL AND MIGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN METAPOPULATIONS , 2000 .

[44]  J. Roland,et al.  ALPINE PARNASSIUS BUTTERFLY DISPERSAL: EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE AND POPULATION SIZE , 2000 .