How to recognize opportunities: heterarchical search in a trading room

Our task in this paper is to analyze the organization of trading in the era of quantitative finance. To do so, we conduct an ethnography of arbitrage, the trading strategy that best exemplifies finance in the wake of the quantitative revolution. In contrast to value and momentum investing, we argue, arbitrage involves an art of association the construction of equivalence (comparability) of properties across different assets. In place of essential or relational characteristics, the peculiar valuation that takes place in arbitrage is based on an operation that makes something the measure of something else associating securities to each other. The process of recognizing opportunities and the practices of making novel associations are shaped by the specific socio-spatial and socio-technical configurations of the trading room. Calculation is distributed across persons and instruments as the trading room organizes interaction among diverse principles of valuation.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[2]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizing Knowledge , 1998 .

[3]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[4]  M. Callon,et al.  The economy of qualities , 2002 .

[5]  Michel Callon,et al.  An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology , 1998 .

[6]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[7]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[8]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Negotiating a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange , 2001 .

[9]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[10]  B. Carruthers,et al.  Success and Survival on Wall Street: Understanding the Mind of the Market , 1999 .

[11]  Peter L. Bernstein,et al.  Capital Ideas: The Improbable Origins of Modern Wall Street , 1991 .

[12]  Peter Galison,et al.  The architecture of science , 1999 .

[13]  H. White,et al.  Where do markets come from , 1981 .

[14]  David Stark,et al.  Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity in New-Media Projects , 2002 .

[15]  Nicholas Dunbar Inventing Money: The Story of Long-Term Capital Management and the Legends Behind It , 1999 .

[16]  L. Boltanski,et al.  De la justification : les économies de la grandeur , 1991 .

[17]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Inter-Organizational Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry , 1996 .

[18]  L. Thevenot,et al.  Organized Complexity , 2001 .

[19]  Urs Bruegger,et al.  Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  J. Hull Options, futures, and other derivative securities , 1989 .

[21]  Michel Grossetti,et al.  Markets from Networks. Socioeconomic Models of Production , 2003 .

[22]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[24]  Luc Boltanski,et al.  The Sociology of Critical Capacity , 1999 .

[25]  D. Stark,et al.  Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Postsocialism , 1997 .