Bony Vibration Stimulation Test Combined With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Can Discography be Replaced?

Study Design. The results of two noninvasive methods, magnetic resonance imaging and a bony vibration test, were compared with discographic pain provocation findings. Objectives. To evaluate whether the combination of magnetic resonance imaging and vibration pain provocation tests could be used to replace discography in low back pain diagnostics. Summary of Background Data. Magnetic resonance imaging gives a wealth of visual information on anatomic changes of the spine with often unknown clinical significance. Discographic examination of the spine is still the only widely accepted diagnostic method that can relate the pathoanatomic changes to the patient's clinical pain. Internal anular rupture has been shown to be one of the sources of back pain. The bony vibration test of the spinal processes has been shown correlate well with discographic pain provocation tests in cases of internal anular rupture. Methods. The three lowest lumbar discs of 33 patients with back pain were examined by means of magnetic resonance imaging and a bony vibration stimulation test, and the results were compared with those from computed tomography-discography. Results. In cases of intradiscal magnetic resonance imaging findings, the vibration provocation test showed a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.50 compared with the discographic pain provocation test. If the patients with previous back surgery were excluded, the specificity was 0.75. In the cases of total anular rupture, the sensitivity was 0.50, and the specificity was 0.33. Conclusion. The combination of the two noninvasive methods, vibration stimulation and magnetic resonance imaging, gives more information on the origin of the back pain than magnetic resonance imaging alone. The pathoanatomic changes seen in magnetic resonance imaging can be correlated with the patient's disorder more reliably using the vibration provocation test in the cases of partial anular ruptures. The use of discography can be limited mostly to cases with total anular ruptures detected by magnetic resonance imaging.

[1]  O. Tervonen,et al.  Ultrasonic Imaging of Lumbar Discs Combined With Vibration Pain Provocation Compared With Discography in the Diagnosis of Internal Anular Fissures of the Lumbar Spine , 1996, Spine.

[2]  R A Deyo,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. Terrific test or tar baby? , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  N. Bogduk,et al.  High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Lumbar discography in normal subjects. A controlled, prospective study. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  E. Marani,et al.  Innervation of annulus fibrosis in low back pain , 1990, The Lancet.

[6]  T. Yasuma,et al.  False-negative lumbar discograms. Correlation of discographic and histological findings in postmortem and surgical specimens. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  B. Flannigan,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Disc Degeneration: Correlation with Discography , 1987, Spine.

[8]  R. G. Johnson,et al.  The Relationship of Pain Provocation to Lumbar Disc Deterioration as Seen by CT/Discography , 1987, Spine.

[9]  J. O'Brien,et al.  The neuropathology of intervertebral discs removed for low‐back pain , 1980, The Journal of pathology.

[10]  N. Bogduk,et al.  The nerve supply to the human lumbar intervertebral discs. , 1981, Journal of anatomy.

[11]  K. Lindblom Diagnostic puncture of intervertebral disks in sciatica. , 1948, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.