Consumers' Responses to Facebook Advertising across PCs and Mobile Phones

ABSTRACT Social-networking sites, such as Facebook, are an important and fast-growing advertising channel. Because access to social-networking sites may happen through different devices, it is important to identify whether the drivers and mitigating factors affecting responses to social-networking-site advertising differ between consumers who access Facebook primarily on PCs versus on mobile phones. The authors tested a model anchored in social-exchange theory and drawing on uses and gratifications theory, using data from a survey of Facebook users in France. Results show that the trade-off between the intrinsic and social value Facebook advertisements bring and their perceived intrusiveness and privacy invasiveness drives consumers' approach and avoidance of Facebook advertising. Trust in Facebook also emerged as a key driver of advertisement acceptance.

[1]  Sanne Kruikemeier,et al.  Behavioral Advertising : A Literature Review and Research Agenda , 2017 .

[2]  Paul Barford,et al.  Ad Blockers: Global Prevalence and Impact , 2016, Internet Measurement Conference.

[3]  Russell W. Belk,et al.  Extended self and the digital world , 2016 .

[4]  Jon D. Morris,et al.  Are Social Marketing and Advertising Communications (SMACs) Meaningful?: A Survey of Facebook User Emotional Responses, Source Credibility, Personal Relevance, and Perceived Intrusiveness , 2016 .

[5]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Mobile Advertising: A Framework and Research Agenda , 2016 .

[6]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  The personalization-privacy paradox: implications for new media , 2016 .

[7]  Jerzy Surma,et al.  Social exchange in online social networks. The reciprocity phenomenon on Facebook , 2016, Comput. Commun..

[8]  Maik Eisenbeiss,et al.  The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising , 2015 .

[9]  H. J. Smith,et al.  Exploring information privacy regulation, risks, trust, and behavior , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Alexander Bleier,et al.  Personalized Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Interplay of What, When, and Where , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Malte Brettel,et al.  What Drives Advertising Success on Facebook? An Advertising-Effectiveness Model , 2015, Journal of Advertising Research.

[12]  L. Krishnamurthi,et al.  On the Go: How Mobile Shopping Affects Customer Purchase Behavior , 2015 .

[13]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[14]  Myeong-Cheol Park,et al.  A framework for mobile SNS advertising effectiveness: user perceptions and behaviour perspective , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Yongick Jeong,et al.  What Are You Worrying About on Facebook and Twitter? An Empirical Investigation of Young Social Network Site Users’ Privacy Perceptions and Behaviors , 2014 .

[16]  Jan H. Schumann,et al.  Targeted Online Advertising: Using Reciprocity Appeals to Increase Acceptance among Users of Free Web Services , 2014 .

[17]  Byunghwa Yang,et al.  The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations , 2013 .

[18]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  Consumer attitudes towards mobile marketing in the smart phone era , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[20]  G. L. Cortés,et al.  The Antecedents of Consumers’ Negative Attitudes Toward SMS Advertising: A Theoretical Framework and Empirical Study , 2013 .

[21]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter? , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[22]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[23]  Janny Hoekstra,et al.  Customization of online advertising: The role of intrusiveness , 2013 .

[24]  Yi-Cheng Ku,et al.  Gratifications for using CMC technologies: A comparison among SNS, IM, and e-mail , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Forced or Inspired: Understanding Consumers’ Cognitive Appraisals and Behavioral Responses towards Online Advertising , 2013 .

[26]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[27]  Mariko Morimoto,et al.  Stay Away From Me , 2012 .

[28]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  Catherine Tucker,et al.  Social Networks, Personalized Advertising, and Privacy Controls , 2013 .

[30]  Shu-Chuan Chu Viral Advertising in Social Media , 2011 .

[31]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[33]  David G. Taylor,et al.  Friends, Fans, and Followers: Do Ads Work on Social Networks? , 2011, Journal of Advertising Research.

[34]  Jukka Ylitalo,et al.  PLS marker variable approach to diagnosing and controlling for method variance , 2011, ICIS.

[35]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[36]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  Katherine Roberts Privacy and Perceptions: How Facebook Advertising Affects its Users , 2010 .

[38]  Hairong Li,et al.  Consumer Privacy Concerns and Preference for Degree of Regulatory Control , 2009 .

[39]  Shintaro Okazaki Social influence model and electronic word of mouth , 2009 .

[40]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications , 2010 .

[42]  Andrea Everard,et al.  An Experimental Study of Antecedents and Consequences of Online Ad Intrusiveness , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[43]  Sally J. McMillan,et al.  Gearing up for mobile advertising: A cross‐cultural examination of key factors that drive mobile messages home to consumers , 2008 .

[44]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Online Advertising Research in Advertising Journals: A Review , 2008 .

[45]  V. Virtanen,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Drivers of Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Advertising , 2007 .

[46]  Mariko Morimoto,et al.  Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Unsolicited Commercial E-mail and Postal Direct Mail Marketing Methods , 2006 .

[47]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[48]  S. Barnes,et al.  Driving consumer acceptance of mobile marketing: a theoretical framework and empirical study , 2005 .

[49]  Per E. Pedersen,et al.  Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons , 2005 .

[50]  Andrew J. Rohm,et al.  Consumers' Protection of Online Privacy and Identity , 2004 .

[51]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  WHY DO PEOPLE AVOID ADVERTISING ON THE INTERNET? , 2004 .

[52]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Ting-Peng Liang,et al.  Consumer Attitudes Toward Mobile Advertising: An Empirical Study , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[54]  X. Drèze,et al.  Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? , 2003 .

[55]  Hairong Li,et al.  Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-Up Ads , 2002 .

[56]  Pradeep K. Korgaonkar,et al.  Beliefs, attitudes and behaviour towards Web advertising , 2002 .

[57]  Linda D. Molm,et al.  Risk and Trust in Social Exchange: An Experimental Test of a Classical Proposition , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[58]  K. Sheehan,et al.  Flaming, Complaining, Abstaining: How Online Users Respond to Privacy Concerns , 1999 .

[59]  Alaina Kanfer,et al.  Survey of Internet users’ attitudes toward Internet advertising , 1999 .

[60]  M. Culnan,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[61]  S. Fournier,et al.  Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies , 1998 .

[62]  H. Jeff Smith,et al.  Values, personal information privacy, and regulatory approaches , 1995, CACM.

[63]  M. Culnan Consumer awareness of name removal procedures: Implications for direct marketing , 1995 .

[64]  Banwari Mittal,et al.  Here's the Beef: Factors, Determinants, and Segments in Consumer Criticism of Advertising , 1993 .

[65]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[66]  E. Katz,et al.  Uses and Gratifications Research , 2019, The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies.

[67]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .