Problematic Approach of Legislators

The relative absence of political figure targets from stalking research is problematic for law enforcement personnel challenged with distinguishing cases representing a onetime contact from those that continue or escalate. Accordingly, this study compared solitary cases of problematic approach with stalking and intrusive harassment of legislators using 15 offender, contact, and motivation variables. Results revealed a significant model that correctly reclassified 85% of the single-approach cases and 50% of the stalking cases. Significant risk factors emerged that highlighted the persistent, focused, and multifaceted pursuit of political figure stalkers and intrusive harassers. More generally, results underscore the superior utility of contact and motivational variables for discriminating groups and the need for appropriate comparison groups when describing stalkers across contexts.

[1]  R. Purcell,et al.  Study of stalkers. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[2]  David V James,et al.  Abnormal attentions toward the British Royal Family: factors associated with approach and escalation. , 2010, The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[3]  J R Meloy,et al.  Demographic and clinical comparison of obsessional followers and offenders with mental disorders. , 1995, The American journal of psychiatry.

[4]  David Callaway,et al.  Risk factors for approach behavior toward the u.s. congress , 2003 .

[5]  M. Swartz,et al.  Psychotic symptoms and disorders and the risk of violent behaviour in the community , 1996 .

[6]  F. Farnham,et al.  The role of mental disorder in attacks on European politicians 1990–2004 , 2007, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[7]  B. Rosenfeld,et al.  Factors Associated with Violence in Stalking and Obsessional Harassment Cases , 2002 .

[8]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Psychotic symptoms and violent behaviors: probing the components of “threat/control-override” symptoms , 1998, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[9]  R. Shuy,et al.  FROM VIOLENT WORDS TO VIOLENT DEEDS , 2011 .

[10]  J. Gunn.  Stalkers and Their Victims , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  B Vossekuil,et al.  Threat assessment: defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence. , 1999, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[12]  J Monahan,et al.  Violence and delusions: data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. , 2000, The American journal of psychiatry.

[13]  P E Dietz,et al.  Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to members of the United States Congress. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[14]  R. T. Phillips.  Assessing presidential stalkers and assassins. , 2006, The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[15]  Russell E. Palarea,et al.  The dangerous nature of intimate relationship stalking: threats, violence, and associated risk factors. , 1999, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[16]  M. Coggins,et al.  Mental health consultant to law enforcement: Secret Service development of a Mental Health Liaison Program. , 1998, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[17]  R A Fein,et al.  Assassination in the United States: an operational study of recent assassins, attackers, and near-lethal approachers. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[18]  Mario J Scalora,et al.  An epidemiological assessment of problematic contacts to members of Congress. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  J. Dvoskin,et al.  Integrating research and practice in federal law enforcement: Secret Service applications of behavioral science expertise to protect the President , 1998 .

[20]  Paul E. Mullen,et al.  STALKERS and their victims: Assessing and managing the stalker , 2000 .

[21]  J R Meloy,et al.  Communicated threats and violence toward public and private targets: discerning differences among those who stalk and attack. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[22]  L. Sheridan,et al.  Stalking, Threatening and Attacking Public Figures , 2008 .

[23]  Sharon S. Smith.  From violent words to violent deeds? Assessing risk from threatening communications , 2008 .

[24]  David V. James,et al.  Persistence in stalking: a comparison of associations in general forensic and public figure samples , 2010 .

[25]  David V James,et al.  Stalkers and harassers of British royalty: an exploration of proxy behaviours for violence. , 2011, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[26]  Nancy Thoennes,et al.  Stalking in America : findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey , 1998 .

[27]  Barry Rosenfeld,et al.  Recidivism in Stalking and Obsessional Harassment , 2003, Law and human behavior.

[28]  Kris Mohandie,et al.  The RECON Typology of Stalking: Reliability and Validity Based Upon a Large Sample of North American Stalkers , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[29]  J. Reid Meloy,et al.  A Forensic Investigation of Those Who Stalk Celebrities , 2008 .

[30]  R. de Silva,et al.  De Clerambault’s Syndrome (Erotomania) As a Presenting Feature of Fronto-Temporal Dementia and Motor Neurone Disease (FTD-MND) , 2007, Behavioural Neurology.