Towards Sustainable and Smart Cities: Replicable and KPI-Driven Evaluation Framework

Sustainability is pivotal in the urban transformation strategy in order to reach more resource-efficient, resilient and smarter cities. The goal of being a sustainable city should drive the decisions for city interventions. Nonetheless, impacts need to be quantified, lacking of standard and/or common methodologies that could be replicable across multiple cities. There exist many initiatives aiming at defining indicators and assessment procedures, but without convergence in the definition of terms and application methodologies, making complex its real implementation. Within mySMARTLife project (GA#731297), a KPI-driven evaluation framework is defined with the aim of covering the multiple pillars of a city (i.e. energy, mobility, citizens, economy) in a holistic way. This methodology also defines the concepts and terms to guide urban planners and/or experts at time of implementing the framework in a specific city. The evaluation framework has been deployed in the three cities of Nantes, Hamburg and Helsinki and some lessons learnt have been extracted, such as the necessity of providing a definition of measurement boundary to avoid interpretations. Thanks to a co-creation strategy, the main difficulties and issues from the cities have been taken into consideration for increasing the replicability.

[1]  F. Pardo-Bosch,et al.  Sustainable Cities: A KPI-Driven Sustainable Evaluation Framework for Smart Cities , 2021, Environmental Sciences Proceedings.

[2]  J. Antolín,et al.  Evaluation of Results of City Sustainable Transformation Projects in the Fields of Mobility and Energy Efficiency with Real Application in a District in Valladolid (Spain) , 2021, Sustainability.

[3]  Komninos Angelakoglou,et al.  Assessing Impact, Performance and Sustainability Potential of Smart City Projects: Towards a Case Agnostic Evaluation Framework , 2021, Sustainability.

[4]  I. Dincer,et al.  Development of integrated sustainability performance indicators for better management of smart cities , 2021 .

[5]  Sven Casteleyn,et al.  Understanding the sharing economy and its implication on sustainability in smart cities , 2020 .

[6]  Dimitrios Tzovaras,et al.  A Methodological Framework for the Selection of Key Performance Indicators to Assess Smart City Solutions , 2019, Smart Cities.

[7]  Ignacio C. Fernández,et al.  When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators , 2017 .

[8]  J. Klemeš Assessing and measuring environmental impact and sustainability , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[9]  Oar,et al.  International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol , 2014 .

[10]  U. Berardi Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings , 2012 .

[11]  Simon Elias Bibri,et al.  Transitioning from Smart Cities to Smarter Cities: The Future Potential of ICT of Pervasive Computing for Advancing Environmental Sustainability , 2018 .

[12]  U. Berardi Sustainability assessments of buildings, communities, and cities , 2015 .

[13]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools , 2013 .