论文信息 - Effect of brief training on reliability and applicability of Global Assessment of functioning scale by Psychiatric clinical officers in Uganda.

Effect of brief training on reliability and applicability of Global Assessment of functioning scale by Psychiatric clinical officers in Uganda.

BACKGROUND The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is the standard method and an essential tool for representing a clinician's judgment of a patient's overall level of psychological, social and occupational functioning. As such, it is probably the single most widely used method for assessing impairment among the patients with psychiatric illnesses. OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of one-hour training on application of the GAF by Psychiatric Clinical Officers' in a Ugandan setting. METHOD Five Psychiatrists and five Psychiatric Clinical Officers (PCOs) or Assistant Medical Officers who hold a 2 year diploma in Clinical Psychiatry were randomly selected to independently rate a video-recorded psychiatric interview according to the DSM IV-TR. The PCOs were then offered a one-hour training on how to rate the GAF scale and asked to rate the video case interview again. All ratings were assigned on the basis of past one year, at admission and current functioning. Interclass correlations (ICC) were computed using two-way mixed models. RESULTS The ICC between the psychiatrists and the PCOs before training in the past one year, at admission and current functioning were +0.48, +0.51 and +0.59 respectively. After training, the ICC coefficients were +0.60, +0.82 and +0.83. CONCLUSION Brief training given to PCOs improved the applications of their ratings of GAF scale to acceptable levels. There is need for formal training to this cadre of psychiatric practitioners in the use of the GAF.

[1] B. Armelius,et al. Reliability of global assessment of functioning ratings made by clinical psychiatric staff. , 2005, Psychiatric services.

[2] H. Goldman,et al. Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning. , 1992, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3] J. Fleiss,et al. Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[4] J. Fleiss. Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[5] W. Grove. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[6] J. Lyons,et al. Effects of Brief Training on Application of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale , 2002, Psychological reports.

[7] R. C. Hall,et al. Global assessment of functioning. A modified scale. , 1995, Psychosomatics.

[8] F. Kigozi,et al. Integration of mental health into primary health care in Uganda: opportunities and challenges. , 2009, Mental health in family medicine.

[9] S. Friis,et al. Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use? , 2007, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[10] M. Coffey,et al. A Brief Mental Health Outcome Scale , 1995, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[11] S. Ackerman,et al. Reliability and validity of DSM-IV axis V. , 2000, The American journal of psychiatry.

[12] J. Herbert,et al. Reliability of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale Chapter 1: Background and Literature Survey 1.1. History of the Gaf , 2004 .