Comparison of the ablation rates, fissures and fragments produced with 150 µm and 272 µm laser fibers with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study

[1]  N. Fried,et al.  Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy , 2019, World Journal of Urology.

[2]  Olivier Traxer,et al.  Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser , 2019, World Journal of Urology.

[3]  Luke A. Hardy,et al.  High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies , 2019, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[4]  M. Daudon,et al.  Fragments and dust after Holmium laser lithotripsy with or without “Moses technology”: How are they different? , 2018, Journal of biophotonics.

[5]  W. Roberts,et al.  Understanding the Popcorn Effect During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Dusting. , 2018, Urology.

[6]  O. Traxer,et al.  Dusting technique for lithotripsy: what does it mean? , 2018, Nature Reviews Urology.

[7]  TraxerOlivier,et al.  The Time Has Come to Report Stone Burden in Terms of Volume Instead of Largest Diameter , 2018 .

[8]  O. Traxer,et al.  The Time Has Come to Report Stone Burden in Terms of Volume Instead of Largest Diameter. , 2018, Journal of endourology.

[9]  M. Elhilali,et al.  Moses technology in a stone simulator. , 2017, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[10]  Mostafa M. Elhilali,et al.  Use of the Moses Technology to Improve Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Outcomes: A Preclinical Study , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[11]  M. Alsyouf,et al.  The Effect of Laser Fiber Cleave Technique and Lithotripsy Time on Power Output. , 2016, Journal of endourology.

[12]  I. Tack,et al.  The Cumulated Stone Diameter: A Limited Tool for Stone Burden Estimation. , 2015, Urology.

[13]  Konstantinos N. Plataniotis,et al.  Shape-based kidney detection and segmentation in three-dimensional abdominal ultrasound images , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  R. Kikinis,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  M. Broxvall,et al.  Urinary stone size estimation: a new segmentation algorithm-based CT method , 2012, European Radiology.

[16]  Sutchin R. Patel,et al.  Quantification of preoperative stone burden for ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy: current state and future recommendations. , 2011, Urology.

[17]  Richard L. Blackmon,et al.  Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  Pei Zhong,et al.  A simple method for fabricating artificial kidney stones of different physical properties , 2010, Urological Research.

[19]  Christopher M. Cilip,et al.  Thulium Fiber Laser Ablation of Urinary Stones Through Small-Core Optical Fibers , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[20]  J. Teichman,et al.  Holmium: YAG lithotripsy: optimal power settings. , 1999, Journal of endourology.

[21]  N Kumaravel,et al.  Automatic segmentation of medical images for renal calculi and analysis. , 2001, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.