Comparison of the ablation rates, fissures and fragments produced with 150 µm and 272 µm laser fibers with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study
暂无分享,去创建一个
L. Berthe | O. Traxer | S. Doizi | C. Chaussain | F. Panthier | P. Lapouge | N. Kogane | P. Lapouge
[1] N. Fried,et al. Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy , 2019, World Journal of Urology.
[2] Olivier Traxer,et al. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser , 2019, World Journal of Urology.
[3] Luke A. Hardy,et al. High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies , 2019, Lasers in surgery and medicine.
[4] M. Daudon,et al. Fragments and dust after Holmium laser lithotripsy with or without “Moses technology”: How are they different? , 2018, Journal of biophotonics.
[5] W. Roberts,et al. Understanding the Popcorn Effect During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Dusting. , 2018, Urology.
[6] O. Traxer,et al. Dusting technique for lithotripsy: what does it mean? , 2018, Nature Reviews Urology.
[7] TraxerOlivier,et al. The Time Has Come to Report Stone Burden in Terms of Volume Instead of Largest Diameter , 2018 .
[8] O. Traxer,et al. The Time Has Come to Report Stone Burden in Terms of Volume Instead of Largest Diameter. , 2018, Journal of endourology.
[9] M. Elhilali,et al. Moses technology in a stone simulator. , 2017, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.
[10] Mostafa M. Elhilali,et al. Use of the Moses Technology to Improve Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Outcomes: A Preclinical Study , 2017, Journal of endourology.
[11] M. Alsyouf,et al. The Effect of Laser Fiber Cleave Technique and Lithotripsy Time on Power Output. , 2016, Journal of endourology.
[12] I. Tack,et al. The Cumulated Stone Diameter: A Limited Tool for Stone Burden Estimation. , 2015, Urology.
[13] Konstantinos N. Plataniotis,et al. Shape-based kidney detection and segmentation in three-dimensional abdominal ultrasound images , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
[14] R. Kikinis,et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.
[15] M. Broxvall,et al. Urinary stone size estimation: a new segmentation algorithm-based CT method , 2012, European Radiology.
[16] Sutchin R. Patel,et al. Quantification of preoperative stone burden for ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy: current state and future recommendations. , 2011, Urology.
[17] Richard L. Blackmon,et al. Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.
[18] Pei Zhong,et al. A simple method for fabricating artificial kidney stones of different physical properties , 2010, Urological Research.
[19] Christopher M. Cilip,et al. Thulium Fiber Laser Ablation of Urinary Stones Through Small-Core Optical Fibers , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.
[20] J. Teichman,et al. Holmium: YAG lithotripsy: optimal power settings. , 1999, Journal of endourology.
[21] N Kumaravel,et al. Automatic segmentation of medical images for renal calculi and analysis. , 2001, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.