Visual Classical Conditioning in Wood Ants

Several species of insects have become model systems for studying learning and memory formation. Although many studies focus on freely moving animals, studies implementing classical conditioning paradigms with harnessed insects have been important for investigating the exact cues that individuals learn and the neural mechanisms underlying learning and memory formation. Here we present a protocol for evoking visual associative learning in wood ants through classical conditioning. In this paradigm, ants are harnessed and presented with a visual cue (a blue cardboard), the conditional stimulus (CS), paired with an appetitive sugar reward, the unconditional stimulus (US). Ants perform a Maxilla-Labium Extension Reflex (MaLER), the unconditional response (UR), which can be used as a readout for learning. Training consists of 10 trials, separated by a 5-minute intertrial interval (ITI). Ants are also tested for memory retention 10 minutes or 1 hour after training. This protocol has the potential to allow researchers to analyze, in a precise and controlled manner, the details of visual memory formation and the neural basis of learning and memory formation in wood ants.

[1]  J. Zeil,et al.  The properties of the visual system in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. , 2011, Arthropod structure & development.

[2]  Thomas Preat,et al.  Olfactory conditioning of proboscis activity in Drosophila melanogaster , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  M. Giurfa,et al.  Aversive Learning in Honeybees Revealed by the Olfactory Conditioning of the Sting Extension Reflex , 2007, PloS one.

[4]  F. Marion-Poll,et al.  Parallel Reinforcement Pathways for Conditioned Food Aversions in the Honeybee , 2010, Current Biology.

[5]  D. Laloi,et al.  Olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension in bumble bees , 1999 .

[6]  Luke Chang,et al.  Mixed Effects Modeling in R , 2010 .

[7]  N. Hempel de Ibarra,et al.  Motion cues improve the performance of harnessed bees in a colour learning task , 2015, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  J. Niven,et al.  Are Bigger Brains Better? , 2009, Current Biology.

[9]  A. Sofia D. Fernandes,et al.  Visual associative learning in wood ants , 2018, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  Hideaki Takeuchi,et al.  Associative learning and discrimination of motion cues in the harnessed honeybee Apis mellifera L. , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[11]  Jeremy E. Niven,et al.  Phenotypic Transformation Affects Associative Learning in the Desert Locust , 2013, Current Biology.

[12]  M. Bitterman,et al.  Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera). , 1983, Journal of comparative psychology.

[13]  R. Menzel,et al.  Learning and memory in honeybees: from behavior to neural substrates. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  V. Aksoy,et al.  Behavioural analysis of chromatic and achromatic vision in the ant Formica cunicularia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2012, Vision Research.

[15]  M. Giurfa,et al.  Long-term olfactory memories are stabilised via protein synthesis in Camponotus fellah ants , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  K. Takeda Classical conditioned response in the honey bee , 1961 .

[17]  J. Niven,et al.  Differential scaling within an insect compound eye , 2016, Biology Letters.

[18]  M. Bateson,et al.  Agitated Honeybees Exhibit Pessimistic Cognitive Biases , 2011, Current Biology.

[19]  Volker Dürr,et al.  Tactile conditioning and movement analysis of antennal sampling strategies in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[20]  M. Chapuisat,et al.  Evidence for collective medication in ants , 2003 .

[21]  Patrizia d'Ettorre,et al.  Associative learning in ants: conditioning of the maxilla-labium extension response in Camponotus aethiops. , 2010, Journal of insect physiology.

[22]  Jeremy E. Niven,et al.  Associative olfactory learning in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.