Spatial Gating Effects on Judged Motion of Gratings in Apertures

Wallach has described in qualitative terms the movement of lines behind apertures. We related the data he obtained to the aperture problem, constructed a model of movement perception, and carried out tests of the model. Experiment 1 was a parametric study, and showed the conditions under which a reliable illusion (the barber pole illusion) of diagonal movement of lines along an aperture could be obtained, and when fluctuating judgements or veridical percepts were obtained. On the basis of this study a dipole model was constructed. The model was further developed and tested. In experiment 2 the effects of total area of stimulation were examined: diagonal gratings were viewed behind multiple apertures. In experiment 3 the effects of local signs were examined: diagonal gratings were viewed in an aperture which had edges cut in small steps and stairs, with the risers parallel to the grating, and the treads parallel to the direction of motion of the grating. Experiment 4 was designed to test a prediction about the motion aftereffect of dots near and far from the point of fixation, and the results confirmed the model. It was concluded that the model accounts for the barber pole illusion and, generally, for the movement of gratings in apertures.

[1]  D Marr,et al.  Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  O. Braddick,et al.  Direction discrimination for band-pass filtered random dot kinematograms , 1990, Vision Research.

[3]  C. Koch,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: from computational theory to neuronal mechanisms. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  George Mather,et al.  The dependence of edge displacement thresholds on edge blur, contrast and displacement distance , 1987, Vision Research.

[5]  B Moulden,et al.  A Simultaneous Shift in Apparent Direction: Further Evidence for a “Distribution-Shift” Model of Direction Coding , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Ellen C Hildreth,et al.  Computing the velocity field along contours , 1986, Workshop on Motion.

[7]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The perception of apparent motion. , 1986, Scientific American.

[8]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The aperture problem—I. Perception of nonrigidity and motion direction in translating sinusoidal lines , 1988, Vision Research.

[9]  Guy Orban,et al.  9 – THE PERCEPTION OF MOTION , 1990 .

[10]  O. Braddick.  A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[11]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perceptual organization in moving patterns , 1983, Nature.

[12]  David C. Burr,et al.  Receptive field properties of human motion detector units inferred from spatial frequency masking , 1989, Vision Research.

[13]  G G Haydu,et al.  Perception of Apparent Motion. , 1960, Science.

[14]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The aperture problem—II. Spatial integration of velocity information along contours , 1988, Vision Research.