Towards real-time 2D/3D registration for organ motion monitoring in image-guided radiation therapy

Nowadays, radiation therapy systems incorporate kV imaging units which allow for the real-time acquisition of intra-fractional X-ray images of the patient with high details and contrast. An application of this technology is tumor motion monitoring during irradiation. For tumor tracking, implanted markers or position sensors are used which requires an intervention. 2D/3D intensity based registration is an alternative, non-invasive method but the procedure must be accelerate to the update rate of the device, which lies in the range of 5 Hz. In this paper we investigate fast CT to a single kV X-ray 2D/3D image registration using a new porcine reference phantom with seven implanted fiducial markers. Several parameters influencing the speed and accuracy of the registrations are investigated. First, four intensity based merit functions, namely Cross-Correlation, Rank Correlation, Mutual Information and Correlation Ratio, are compared. Secondly, wobbled splatting and ray casting rendering techniques are implemented on the GPU and the influence of each algorithm on the performance of 2D/3D registration is evaluated. Rendering times for a single DRR of 20 ms were achieved. Different thresholds of the CT volume were also examined for rendering to find the setting that achieves the best possible correspondence with the X-ray images. Fast registrations below 4 s became possible with an inplane accuracy down to 0.8 mm.

[1]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Wobbled splatting—a fast perspective volume rendering method for simulation of x-ray images from CT , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  Robust Gradient-Based 3-D/2-D Registration of CT and MR to X-Ray Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  J. Kettenbach,et al.  Stochastic rank correlation: a robust merit function for 2D/3D registration of image data obtained at different energies. , 2009, Medical physics.

[4]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Organ motion in image-guided radiotherapy: lessons from real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy , 2007, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  A new gold-standard dataset for 2D/3D image registration evaluation , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Lee Westover,et al.  Footprint evaluation for volume rendering , 1990, SIGGRAPH.

[7]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Fast DRR splat rendering using common consumer graphics hardware. , 2007, Medical physics.

[8]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Thomas Theußl,et al.  Isosurfaces on Optimal Regular Samples , 2003, VisSym.

[10]  D. R. Fish,et al.  A patient-to-computed-tomography image registration method based on digitally reconstructed radiographs. , 1994, Medical physics.

[11]  Graeme P. Penney,et al.  Standardized evaluation methodology for 2-D-3-D registration , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  The Correlation Ratio as a New Similarity Measure for Multimodal Image Registration , 1998, MICCAI.

[13]  Markus Stock,et al.  Development and application of a real-time monitoring and feedback system for deep inspiration breath hold based on external marker tracking. , 2006, Medical physics.