Epidemiology of sick building syndrome and its associated risk factors in Singapore.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the occurrence of sick building syndrome in a tropical city, and its relation to indoor air quality and other factors. METHODS: 2856 office workers in 56 randomly selected public and private sector buildings were surveyed. The study consisted of a self administered questionnaire assessing symptoms and perception of the physical and psychosocial environment, inspection of the building plans and premises, and measurement of temperature, relative humidity, respirable particles, chemicals, bioaerosols, and other variables. RESULTS: Symptoms typical of the sick building syndrome were reported in 19.6% of the respondents. Multivariate modelling substantiated contributions associated with low thermal comfort, high work related stress, too much noise, a history of allergy or other medical conditions, poor lighting, young employees, and female sex. Measurements of indoor air quality or ventilation were not found to be reliable predictors of the symptoms. CONCLUSION: The survey confirmed the presence of sick building syndrome and its risk factors in the tropics. A biopsychosocial approach to the problem involving symptomatic treatment, environmental control, good ergonomic design, and stress management is recommended.

[1]  G. Abbritti,et al.  High prevalence of sick building syndrome in a new air-conditioned building in Italy. , 1992, Archives of environmental health.

[2]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistics with confidence: Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines . , 1990 .

[3]  M J Hodgson,et al.  Symptoms and microenvironmental measures in nonproblem buildings. , 1991, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[4]  P L Ooi,et al.  Epidemiological Investigations into an Outbreak of Building-Associated Illness in Singapore , 1994, Asia-Pacific journal of public health.

[5]  C. Hoge,et al.  Advances in the epidemiology and control of Legionella infections. , 1991, Epidemiologic reviews.

[6]  O. Valbjørn,et al.  Indoor Climate and Air Quality Problems: Investigation and Remedy , 1990 .

[7]  D. G. Wastell,et al.  Statistics with confidence—Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines , 1991 .

[8]  K. T. Goh,et al.  Sick-building syndrome in a tropical city , 1996, The Lancet.

[9]  B. Weiss.  Low-Level Chemical Sensitivity: A Perspective from Behavioral Toxicology , 1994, Toxicology and industrial health.

[10]  K. Sexton,et al.  Indoor air pollution: a public health perspective. , 1983, Science.

[11]  Baker Db,et al.  Social and organizational factors in office building-associated illness. , 1989 .

[12]  Ingrid Ritchie,et al.  Indoor Air Pollution: A Health Perspective , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  S. Glantz,et al.  Primer of Applied Regression & Analysis of Variance , 1990 .

[14]  K Kreiss.  The sick building syndrome in office buildings--a breath of fresh air. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Judy Sparer,et al.  Sick-building syndrome , 1997, The Lancet.

[16]  S. Glantz.  Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance / Stanton A. Glantz, Bryan K. Slinker , 1990 .

[17]  L. Fine,et al.  Building ventilation and symptoms--where do we go from here? , 1994, American journal of public health.

[18]  American Conference Of Governmental Industrial Hygienists 1998 Ventilation A O , 2019 .

[19]  J J Jaakkola,et al.  Type of ventilation system in office buildings and sick building syndrome. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[20]  Olli Seppänen,et al.  Mechanical Ventilation in Office Buildings and the Sick Building Syndrome. An Experimental and Epidemiological Study , 1991 .

[21]  A. Franx,et al.  The fourth sound of Korotkoff in pregnancy: a myth? , 1996, The Lancet.

[22]  B. Stenberg,et al.  Why do women report 'sick building symptoms' more often than men? , 1995, Social Science & Medicine (1967).