Nuts! I can't figure out how to use my life-saving epinephrine auto-injector!

BACKGROUND Epinephrine auto-injectors for food allergy emergency treatment is used as a case study to illustrate how human factors in device design has an impact on proper management of anaphylaxis. Because timely injection is so crucial, epinephrine comes in preloaded syringes or auto-injectors that patients can carry with them. However, many factors influence whether treatment is carried out properly. HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING (HFE) ANALYSIS The incidence of incorrectly using auto-injectors is not isolated; studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients, and even physicians, do not know how to correctly use the devices. Some auto-injectors appear to be modeled with a metaphor in mind (a pen), but they do not appear and operate consistently with the metaphor. In addition, the device is difficult to transport. The portability issue creates a challenge that cannot be adequately addressed with traditional intervention measures--reminders or more education. They are all human factors issues and require human factors-based interventions. SUMMARY Although education and training in how to use an auto-injector are important for effective management of anaphylaxis, a poorly designed device can lead to incorrect operation of such a device. HFE can improve device design so that it is reliably and correctly used even with minimal training. Manufacturers, allergists/immunologists, and pharmacists all have critical roles to play to ensure the correct use of this life-saving device.

[1]  H. Sampson.  Anaphylaxis and emergency treatment. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[2]  R. Sabroe,et al.  An audit of the use of self‐administered adrenaline syringes in patients with angio‐oedema , 2002, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  S. W. Huang.  A survey of Epi-PEN use in patients with a history of anaphylaxis. , 1998, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[4]  H. Sampson,et al.  Fatal and near-fatal anaphylactic reactions to food in children and adolescents. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  A. Burks,et al.  Prevalence of peanut and tree nut allergy in the US determined by a random digit dial telephone survey. , 1999, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[6]  R. Klasco.  Fatal and near-fatal anaphylactic reactions to food in children and adolescents: Sampson HA, Mendelson L, Rosen JP N Engl J Med 327:380–384 Aug 1992 , 1993 .

[7]  C. Wickens.  Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[8]  R. Sainsbury,et al.  First aid anaphylaxis management in children who were prescribed an epinephrine autoinjector device (EpiPen). , 2000, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[9]  S. Sicherer,et al.  Use assessment of self-administered epinephrine among food-allergic children and pediatricians. , 2000, Pediatrics.

[10]  G. Hayman,et al.  Knowledge about using auto-injectable adrenaline: review of patients' case notes and interviews with general practitioners , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Pumphrey.  Lessons for management of anaphylaxis from a study of fatal reactions , 2000, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[12]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Understanding Human Error and Aiding Human Diagnostic Behaviour in Nuclear Power Plants , 1981 .

[13]  A. Burks,et al.  Effect of anti-IgE therapy in patients with peanut allergy. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  C. Roifman,et al.  Anaphylaxis and epinephrine auto-injector training: who will teach the teachers? , 1999, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[15]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[16]  J Gosbee,et al.  Human factors engineering and patient safety , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[17]  S. Sicherer.  Self-injectable epinephrine: no size fits all! , 2001, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.