Variability in visual cortex size reflects tradeoff between local orientation sensitivity and global orientation modulation

The surface area of early visual cortices varies several fold across healthy adult humans and is genetically heritable. But the functional consequences of this anatomical variability are still largely unexplored. Here we show that interindividual variability in human visual cortical surface area reflects a tradeoff between sensitivity to visual details and susceptibility to visual context. Specifically, individuals with larger primary visual cortices can discriminate finer orientation differences, whereas individuals with smaller primary visual cortices experience stronger perceptual modulation by global orientation contexts. This anatomically correlated tradeoff between discrimination sensitivity and contextual modulation of orientation perception, however, does not generalize to contrast perception or luminance perception. Neural field simulations based on a scaling of intracortical circuits reproduce our empirical observations. Together our findings reveal a feature-specific shift in the scope of visual perception from context-oriented to detail-oriented with increased visual cortical surface area.

[1]  Thom Carney,et al.  Orientation discrimination as a function of stimulus eccentricity and size: Nasal/temporal retinal asymmetry , 1988, Vision Research.

[2]  A. Borst Seeing smells: imaging olfactory learning in bees , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Reid,et al.  Broadly Tuned Response Properties of Diverse Inhibitory Neuron Subtypes in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[4]  P. Rakic Specification of cerebral cortical areas. , 1988, Science.

[5]  E. Ponder,et al.  THE POTENTIAL AND RESPIRATION OF FROG SKIN : I. THE EFFECT OF THE HOMOLOGOUS CARBAMATES. II. THE EFFECT OF CERTAIN LYSINS. , 1937 .

[6]  R. Snowden,et al.  The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination , 1998, Vision Research.

[7]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[8]  M. Carandini,et al.  Predictions of a recurrent model of orientation selectivity , 1997, Vision Research.

[9]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Peaked encoding of relative luminance in macaque areas V1 and V2. , 2005, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[10]  N. Swindale,et al.  How many maps are there in visual cortex? , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  S. Wu,et al.  Synaptic organization of the vertebrate retina: general principles and species-specific variations: the Friedenwald lecture. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  S J Leat,et al.  Rivalry with Continuous and Flashed Stimuli as a Measure of Ocular Dominance across the Visual Field , 1984, Perception.

[14]  M. Cannon,et al.  A model for inhibitory lateral interaction effects in perceived contrast , 1996, Vision Research.

[15]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  C. D. Hendley,et al.  THE RELATION BETWEEN VISUAL ACUITY AND BRIGHTNESS DISCRIMINATION , 1946, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  M. Morgan,et al.  Crowding and the tilt illusion: toward a unified account. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[18]  D. Purves,et al.  Interindividual Variation in Human Visual Performance , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Gold,et al.  How mechanisms of perceptual decision-making affect the psychometric function , 2013, Progress in Neurobiology.

[20]  Jong H. Yoon,et al.  GABA Concentration Is Reduced in Visual Cortex in Schizophrenia and Correlates with Orientation-Specific Surround Suppression , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  Large repulsion, but not attraction, tilt illusions occur when stimulus parameters selectively favour either transient (M-like) or sustained (P-like) mechanisms , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  Wolfgang Jaschinski,et al.  Individual differences in the asymmetry of binocular saccades, analysed with mixed-effects models , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[23]  Jon H. Kaas,et al.  Why is Brain Size so Important:Design Problems and Solutions as Neocortex Gets Biggeror Smaller , 2000 .

[24]  D. Samuel Schwarzkopf,et al.  The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  H Haug,et al.  Brain sizes, surfaces, and neuronal sizes of the cortex cerebri: a stereological investigation of man and his variability and a comparison with some mammals (primates, whales, marsupials, insectivores, and one elephant). , 1987, The American journal of anatomy.

[26]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Association of common genetic variants in GPCPD1 with scaling of visual cortical surface area in humans , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  E. William Yund,et al.  Color and brightness contrast effects as a function of spatial variables , 1975, Vision Research.

[28]  G. Rees,et al.  The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  D. Coppola,et al.  Universality in the Evolution of Orientation Columns in the Visual Cortex , 2010, Science.

[30]  D. G. Albrecht Visual cortex neurons in monkey and cat: Effect of contrast on the spatial and temporal phase transfer functions , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[32]  Anna W Roe,et al.  The organization of orientation-selective, luminance-change and binocular- preference domains in the second (V2) and third (V3) visual areas of New World owl monkeys as revealed by intrinsic signal optical imaging. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  Krish D. Singh,et al.  Orientation Discrimination Performance Is Predicted by GABA Concentration and Gamma Oscillation Frequency in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Blake,et al.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[35]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Robust detection of ocular dominance columns in humans using Hahn Spin Echo BOLD functional MRI at 7 Tesla , 2007, NeuroImage.

[36]  The effects of alcohol on interhemispheric transmission , 2004 .

[37]  A. F. Rossi,et al.  The representation of brightness in primary visual cortex. , 1996, Science.

[38]  M. Carandini,et al.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  M. Morgan,et al.  Strong tilt illusions always reduce orientation acuity , 2009, Vision Research.

[40]  Matteo Carandini,et al.  Two Distinct Mechanisms of Suppression in Human Vision , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Robert O. Duncan,et al.  Cortical Magnification within Human Primary Visual Cortex Correlates with Acuity Thresholds , 2003, Neuron.

[42]  S. Nelson,et al.  An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[43]  R. Blake © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[44]  J. D. Mollon,et al.  Is there a general trait of susceptibility to simultaneous contrast? , 2010, Vision Research.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Dynamic Brain: From Spiking Neurons to Neural Masses and Cortical Fields , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  M. Morgan,et al.  Stochastic re-calibration: contextual effects on perceived tilt , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  Nao Ninomiya,et al.  The 10th anniversary of journal of visualization , 2007, J. Vis..

[48]  Patrick Ragert,et al.  Cortical topography of intracortical inhibition influences the speed of decision making , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  G. Orban,et al.  Decision processes in visual discrimination of line orientation. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  D. Chklovskii,et al.  Maps in the brain: what can we learn from them? , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[51]  A. Dekaban,et al.  Changes in brain weights during the span of human life: Relation of brain weights to body heights and body weights , 1978, Annals of neurology.

[52]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[53]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[54]  Eli Peli,et al.  Thresholds vary between spatial and temporal forced-choice paradigms: the case of lateral interactions in peripheral vision. , 2005, Spatial vision.

[55]  J L Ringo,et al.  Neuronal interconnection as a function of brain size. , 1991, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[56]  D. Ts'o,et al.  Visual topography in primate V2: multiple representation across functional stripes , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[57]  W. Ehrenstein,et al.  Eye preference within the context of binocular functions , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[58]  P. Dayan,et al.  Space and time in visual context , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[59]  M. Carandini,et al.  GABAA Inhibition Controls Response Gain in Visual Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Chang-Bing Huang,et al.  Perceptual Learning Improves Contrast Sensitivity of V1 Neurons in Cats , 2010, Current Biology.

[61]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex: a possible neural basis of binocular rivalry , 1995, Vision Research.

[62]  B. Fischer,et al.  Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[63]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Modelling the dependence of contrast sensitivity on grating area and spatial frequency , 1993, Vision Research.

[64]  Isabelle Mareschal,et al.  Cortical distance determines whether flankers cause crowding or the tilt illusion. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[65]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks , 2011, Nature.

[66]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[67]  Y. Dan,et al.  Clonally Related Visual Cortical Neurons Show Similar Stimulus Feature Selectivity , 2012, Nature.