Five factors that guide attention in visual search
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] John B. Shoven,et al. I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.
[2] L. Kaufman,et al. “Center-of-gravity” Tendencies for fixations and flow patterns , 1969 .
[3] U. Frith. Acurious effect with reversed letters explained by a theory of schema , 1974 .
[4] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[5] I. Biederman,et al. Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[6] L. E. Krueger. The category effect in visual search depends on physical rather than conceptual differences , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[7] H. Egeth,et al. Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[8] S Ullman,et al. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.
[9] J. H. Flowers,et al. How does familiarity affect visual search for letter strings? , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[10] D. Badcock,et al. Processing feature density in preattentive perception , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.
[11] Susan L. Franzel,et al. Binocularity and visual search , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.
[12] J. Duncan,et al. Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.
[13] Susan L. Franzel,et al. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[14] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.
[15] J. Henderson. Object identification in context: the visual processing of natural scenes. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.
[16] I Kovács,et al. A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[17] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.
[18] P Cavanagh,et al. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[19] J. Wolfe,et al. Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[20] M. V. von Grünau,et al. The Detection of Gaze Direction: A Stare-In-The-Crowd Effect , 1995, Perception.
[21] Deborah J. Aks,et al. Visual search for size is influenced by a background texture gradient. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[22] G. Humphreys,et al. Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.
[23] J. Wolfe,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article WHAT CAN 1 MILLION TRIALS TELL US ABOUT VISUAL SEARCH? , 2022 .
[24] M. Chun,et al. Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.
[25] J. Henderson,et al. High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.
[26] M. Chun,et al. Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .
[27] Ronald A. Rensink. Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing , 2000, Vision Research.
[28] C. Koch,et al. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.
[29] J. Wolfe,et al. Post-attentive vision , 2001 .
[30] A. Kramer,et al. Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[31] J. Henderson,et al. Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2002 .
[32] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.
[33] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Do Intersections Serve as Basic Features in Visual Search? , 2003, Perception.
[34] Doug Gurian-Sherman,et al. Competing interests , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.
[35] J. Wolfe,et al. Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[36] Bruno A Olshausen,et al. Sparse coding of sensory inputs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[37] J. Townsend,et al. The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[38] J. Wolfe,et al. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[39] Naomi M. Kenner,et al. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search , 2004, Vision Research.
[40] C. Li,et al. Oculomotor correlates of context-guided learning in visual search , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.
[41] Shaul Hochstein,et al. At first sight: A high-level pop out effect for faces , 2005, Vision Research.
[42] K. Fujii,et al. Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..
[43] John K. Tsotsos,et al. Neurobiology of Attention , 2005 .
[44] Yuhong Jiang,et al. Setting up the target template in visual search. , 2005, Journal of vision.
[45] Á. Kristjánsson. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task , 2006, Vision Research.
[46] R. VanRullen. On second glance: Still no high-level pop-out effect for faces , 2006, Vision Research.
[47] S. Hochstein,et al. With a careful look: Still no low-level confound to face pop-out , 2006, Vision Research.
[48] James R. Brockmole,et al. Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search , 2006 .
[49] J. Maunsell,et al. Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.
[50] Antonio Torralba,et al. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.
[51] Melina A. Kunar,et al. Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[52] Nao Ninomiya,et al. The 10th anniversary of journal of visualization , 2007, J. Vis..
[53] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.
[54] Frank E. Ritter,et al. The Rise of Cognitive Architectures , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.
[55] Wayne D. Gray. Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems , 2007, Oxford series on cognitive models and architectures.
[56] Wolfgang Nitsche,et al. Infrared based visualization of wall shear stress distributions with a high temporal and spatial resolution , 2007, J. Vis..
[57] Michael L. Mack,et al. VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES , 2007 .
[58] J. Henderson,et al. Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[59] A. Ali,et al. scFv Antibody: Principles and Clinical Application , 2012, Clinical & developmental immunology.
[60] Árni Kristjánsson,et al. Priming in visual search: Separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role-reversal , 2008, Vision Research.
[61] Daniel Smilek,et al. Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.
[62] Daniel Smilek,et al. Visual search is not blind to emotion , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.
[63] Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al. Exploring set size effects in scenes: Identifying the objects of search , 2008 .
[64] P. Perona,et al. Objects predict fixations better than early saliency. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[65] Tim K Marks,et al. SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[66] Jon Driver,et al. Repetition streaks increase perceptual sensitivity in visual search of brief displays , 2008, Visual cognition.
[67] Brian J. Scholl,et al. The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[68] G. Kuhn,et al. Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[69] George L. Malcolm,et al. Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[70] A. Hollingworth. Two forms of scene memory guide visual search: Memory for scene context and memory for the binding of target object to scene location , 2009 .
[71] Christof Koch,et al. A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .
[72] I. Hyman,et al. Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone , 2009 .
[73] Michelle R. Greene,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Briefest of Glances The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2022 .
[74] Michelle R. Greene,et al. The Briefest of Glances: The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2009 .
[75] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Fur in the midst of the waters: visual search for material type is inefficient. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[76] John M Henderson,et al. The time course of initial scene processing for eye movement guidance in natural scene search. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[77] A. Schubö,et al. Contextual cueing effects despite spatially cued target locations. , 2010, Psychophysiology.
[78] George L. Malcolm,et al. Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[79] J. Henderson,et al. Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[80] Thomas Geyer,et al. Contextual cueing of pop-out visual search: when context guides the deployment of attention. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[81] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. Does contextual cueing guide the deployment of attention , 2010 .
[82] Dominique Lamy,et al. The role of search difficulty in intertrial feature priming , 2011, Vision Research.
[83] Michael J Proulx,et al. Does apparent size capture attention in visual search? Evidence from the Muller-Lyer illusion. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[84] Ashley M. Sherman,et al. Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[85] J. Theeuwes,et al. Signals of threat do not capture, but prioritize, attention: a conditioning approach. , 2011, Emotion.
[86] M. Castelhano,et al. Scene context influences without scene gist: Eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[87] Ronald A. Rensink. The Management of Visual Attention in Graphic Displays the Management of Visual Attention in Graphic Displays 0. Visual Perception , 2022 .
[88] Patryk A. Laurent,et al. Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[89] D. Ballard,et al. Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[90] C. Paffen,et al. A search asymmetry for interocular conflict , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[91] Liqiang Huang,et al. Familiarity does not aid access to features , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[92] A. Schubö,et al. Is contextual cueing more than the guidance of visual–spatial attention? , 2011, Biological Psychology.
[93] Alex D. Hwang,et al. Semantic guidance of eye movements in real-world scenes , 2011, Vision Research.
[94] Derrick G Watson,et al. Visual search in a multi-element asynchronous dynamic (MAD) world. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[95] Simon P. Liversedge,et al. The effect of the first glimpse at a scene on eye movements during search , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[96] James J. DiCarlo,et al. How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.
[97] Krista A. Ehinger,et al. Rethinking the Role of Top-Down Attention in Vision: Effects Attributable to a Lossy Representation in Peripheral Vision , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[98] J. Wolfe,et al. When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[99] Shirama Aya. Stare in the crowd: frontal face guides overt attention independently of its gaze direction. , 2012, Perception.
[100] C. Paffen,et al. Interocular conflict attracts attention , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[101] Serena Falasca,et al. Laboratory simulations of an urban heat island in a stratified atmospheric boundary layer , 2013, J. Vis..
[102] J. Wolfe,et al. Differential Electrophysiological Signatures of Semantic and Syntactic Scene Processing , 2013, Psychological science.
[103] James T Enns,et al. The role of clarity and blur in guiding visual attention in photographs. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[104] Marius Usher,et al. Competitive guided search: meeting the challenge of benchmark RT distributions. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[105] J. Wolfe,et al. Coarse guidance by numerosity in visual search , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[106] Visual search for chasing objects among distractors , 2013 .
[107] Hui Li,et al. A unique visual rhythm does not pop out , 2013, Cognitive Processing.
[108] S. Yantis,et al. Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[109] Wolfgang Einhäuser,et al. Attention in natural scenes: contrast affects rapid visual processing and fixations alike , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[110] Shenmin Zhang,et al. What do saliency models predict? , 2014, Journal of vision.
[111] A. Harel,et al. Association and dissociation between detection and discrimination of objects of expertise: Evidence from visual search , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[112] Markus Huff,et al. Perceptual animacy: visual search for chasing objects among distractors. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[113] Sabine Kastner,et al. The Oxford Handbook of Attention , 2014 .
[114] Michael C. Hout,et al. Visual similarity is stronger than semantic similarity in guiding visual search for numbers , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[115] Wilma Koutstaal,et al. The hard-won benefits of familiarity in visual search: naturally familiar brand logos are found faster , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[116] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Guided search for triple conjunctions , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[117] Claudia Roda. Human Attention in Digital Environments , 2014 .
[118] Melina A. Kunar,et al. When are abrupt onsets found efficiently in complex visual search? Evidence from multielement asynchronous dynamic search. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[119] Robert G Alexander,et al. Are summary statistics enough? Evidence for the importance of shape in guiding visual search , 2014, Visual cognition.
[120] J. Wolfe,et al. The role of memory for visual search in scenes , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[121] Corbin A. Cunningham,et al. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[122] John K. Tsotsos,et al. On computational modeling of visual saliency: Examining what’s right, and what’s left , 2015, Vision Research.
[123] Mary H. MacLean,et al. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[124] W. Einhäuser,et al. Overt attention in natural scenes: Objects dominate features , 2015, Vision Research.
[125] Rufin VanRullen,et al. Attention searches nonuniformly in space and in time , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[126] Jie Huang,et al. Cube search, revisited. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[127] Árni Kristjánsson,et al. Reconsidering Visual Search , 2015, i-Perception.
[128] Krista A. Ehinger,et al. How is visual search guided by shape? Using features from deep learning to understand preattentive shape space , 2016 .
[129] Judith E. Fan,et al. Incidental biasing of attention from visual long-term memory. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[130] J. Wolfe,et al. Differential ERP Signatures Elicited by Semantic and Syntactic Processing in Scenes , 2016 .
[131] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015) , 2016, i-Perception.
[132] Deborah A. Cronin,et al. Towards a better understanding of parallel visual processing in human vision: Evidence for exhaustive analysis of visual information. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[133] R. Rosenholtz,et al. Pooling of continuous features provides a unifying account of crowding , 2016, Journal of vision.
[134] M. Meeter,et al. Long-term priming of visual search prevails against the passage of time and counteracting instructions. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[135] J. DiCarlo,et al. Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.
[136] Marius Usher,et al. Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[137] Manoj Kumar,et al. The influence of semantics on the visual processing of natural scenes , 2017 .
[138] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Binocularity and visual search—Revisited , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[139] Philipp Koehn,et al. Cognitive Psychology , 1992, Ageing and Society.