10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND The comparative effectiveness of treatments for prostate cancer that is detected by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing remains uncertain. METHODS We compared active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, and external-beam radiotherapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Between 1999 and 2009, a total of 82,429 men 50 to 69 years of age received a PSA test; 2664 received a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer, and 1643 agreed to undergo randomization to active monitoring (545 men), surgery (553), or radiotherapy (545). The primary outcome was prostate-cancer mortality at a median of 10 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the rates of disease progression, metastases, and all-cause deaths. RESULTS There were 17 prostate-cancer-specific deaths overall: 8 in the active-monitoring group (1.5 deaths per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 3.0), 5 in the surgery group (0.9 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.2), and 4 in the radiotherapy group (0.7 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.0); the difference among the groups was not significant (P=0.48 for the overall comparison). In addition, no significant difference was seen among the groups in the number of deaths from any cause (169 deaths overall; P=0.87 for the comparison among the three groups). Metastases developed in more men in the active-monitoring group (33 men; 6.3 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 4.5 to 8.8) than in the surgery group (13 men; 2.4 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.2) or the radiotherapy group (16 men; 3.0 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.9) (P=0.004 for the overall comparison). Higher rates of disease progression were seen in the active-monitoring group (112 men; 22.9 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 19.0 to 27.5) than in the surgery group (46 men; 8.9 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 6.7 to 11.9) or the radiotherapy group (46 men; 9.0 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 6.7 to 12.0) (P<0.001 for the overall comparison). CONCLUSIONS At a median of 10 years, prostate-cancer-specific mortality was low irrespective of the treatment assigned, with no significant difference among treatments. Surgery and radiotherapy were associated with lower incidences of disease progression and metastases than was active monitoring. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; ProtecT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297 ; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172 .).

[1]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  P Bauer,et al.  Multiple testing in clinical trials. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  Hans Garmo,et al.  Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  A. Partin,et al.  Is it possible to compare PSA recurrence-free survival after surgery and radiotherapy using revised ASTRO criterion--"nadir + 2"? , 2008, Urology.

[5]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Questionnaire based quality assurance for the RT01 trial of dose escalation in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer (ISRCTN 47772397). , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  T. Tammela,et al.  Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up , 2014, The Lancet.

[7]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: is it 'what you do' or 'the way that you do it'? A UK Perspective on Technique and Quality Assurance. , 2016, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[9]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Standardisation of information submitted to an endpoint committee for cause of death assignment in a cancer screening trial – lessons learnt from CAP (Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer) , 2015, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[10]  P. Walsh A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Monique J. Roobol,et al.  Mortality Results from a Randomized ProstateCancer Screening Trial , 2009 .

[12]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  L. Holmberg,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Factors Determining Change to Radical Treatment in Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[14]  J. Sterne,et al.  Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP) , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  David Chia,et al.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Mufaddal Mamawala,et al.  Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  T. Peters,et al.  Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, or radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: study design and diagnostic and baseline results of the ProtecT randomised phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  Paul Schellhammer,et al.  Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  M. Sydes,et al.  Implementing the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) RT01 trial (ISRCTN 47772397): methods and practicalities of a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in men with localised prostate cancer. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  Anssi Auvinen,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer decreases the risk of developing metastatic disease: findings from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). , 2012, European urology.

[21]  James A Hanley,et al.  20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2005, JAMA.

[22]  J. Oxley,et al.  Contemporary accuracy of death certificates for coding prostate cancer as a cause of death: Is reliance on death certification good enough? A comparison with blinded review by an independent cause of death evaluation committee , 2016, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  C. Lawton,et al.  Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study , 2010 .

[24]  A. D'Amico Treatment or Monitoring for Early Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Peter Kirkbride,et al.  Prostate cancer: summary of updated NICE guidance , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  A. Auvinen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a simulation study based on ERSPC data. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  David Gillatt,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  J. Gohagan,et al.  Prostate cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  M. Roobol,et al.  Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers. , 2015, European urology.

[31]  Jonathan E. Shoag,et al.  Reevaluating PSA Testing Rates in the PLCO Trial. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  R. Volk,et al.  Grading the new US Preventive Services Task Force prostate cancer screening recommendation. , 2011, JAMA.

[33]  Joyce E. Wilkinson,et al.  Patient‐reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomized trial of clinically localized prostate cancer treatments: study design, and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life , 2016, BJU international.

[34]  Ronald C. Chen,et al.  Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  S. Taneja,et al.  Re: Cost-Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Screening: A Simulation Study Based on ERSPC Data. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[36]  Paul W Dickman,et al.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer. , 2004, JAMA.

[37]  Danny Vesprini,et al.  Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.