Paper-based thesis and dissertations: analysis of fundamental characteristics for achieving a robust structure

Abstract Paper aims This study identifies fundamental characteristics for developing a paper-based thesis (PBT), providing some recommendations to researchers who decide for this academic research report. Originality This paper contributes to the literature by providing guidance to develop PBTs, which has been attracting researchers' interest because it demonstrates publication capacity and potential as a researcher. Additionally, it is still not entirely clear which issues and countermeasures researchers should address when choosing the paper-based structure. Research method The authors searched for articles of PBTs already published, institutional documents (e.g., regulations for conducting PBTs in Brazil and abroad) and journal papers concerning this subject. A content and document analysis were conducted in the papers and PBT internal regulations, respectively. Main findings Results indicate five main factors that impact the success of a PBT approach: (i) the initial planning for this academic model; (ii) alignment between the articles and the thesis/dissertation; (iii) research design construction; (iv) copyrights requirements; and (v) issues regarding co-authorship. Based on that, the study also builds some guidelines to structure a robust PBT. Implications for theory and practice Our recommendations might be meaningful to scholars and researchers bring more theoretical, empirical, and structural robustness when developing a PBT final document.

[1]  D. Mikhailidis,et al.  Towards a doctoral thesis through published works. , 1993, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[2]  A. Thompson,et al.  Are doctoral theses with articles more popular than monographs? Supervisors and students in biological and health sciences weigh up risks and benefits , 2020 .

[3]  Cally Guerin,et al.  Connecting the dots: writing a doctoral thesis by publication , 2016 .

[4]  L. Frick PhD by Publication – Panacea or Paralysis? , 2019, Africa Education Review.

[5]  K. Seers Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[6]  P. Kanowski,et al.  PhD by Publication: A Student's Perspective , 2008 .

[7]  Introduction Chapter of Traditional and Article-based Theses: A Comparison of Rhetorical Structures and Linguistic Realisations , 2019, GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies.

[8]  J. Morris,et al.  ‘What do I even call this?’ Challenges and possibilities of undertaking a thesis by publication , 2020, Journal of Further and Higher Education.

[9]  M. Merga,et al.  Integrating publications in the social science doctoral thesis by publication , 2018, Higher Education Research & Development.

[10]  Jane Southcott,et al.  A juggling act: Supervisor/candidate partnership in a doctoral thesis by publication , 2015 .

[11]  M. Pretorius Paper-based theses as the silver bullet for increased research outputs: first hear my story as a supervisor , 2017 .

[12]  Liezel Frick,et al.  Research dissemination and PhD thesis format at a South African university: The impact of policy on practice , 2017 .

[13]  C. Golding,et al.  Assessing the doctoral thesis when it includes published work , 2015 .

[14]  G. Badley Publish and be doctor‐rated: the PhD by published work , 2009 .

[15]  M. Merga,et al.  A current view of the Thesis by Publication in the Humanities and Social Sciences , 2018 .

[16]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Examiners’ commentary on thesis with publications , 2017 .

[17]  Denise Jackson,et al.  Completing a PhD by publication: a review of Australian policy and implications for practice , 2013 .

[18]  B. Kamler Rethinking doctoral publication practices: writing from and beyond the thesis , 2008 .

[19]  S. Peacock The PhD by Publication , 2017 .

[20]  Thesis by Publication in Education: An Autoethnographic Perspective for Educational Researchers. , 2015 .

[21]  D. Bogard,et al.  Copyright , 2015, Neuromuscular Disorders.

[22]  Shannon Mason,et al.  Publications in the doctoral thesis: challenges for doctoral candidates, supervisors, examiners and administrators , 2018 .

[23]  J. Morris,et al.  Choosing the Thesis by Publication approach: motivations and influencers for doctoral candidates , 2019, The Australian Educational Researcher.

[24]  Shannon Mason,et al.  ‘The constant rejections hurt’: Skills and personal attributes needed to successfully complete a thesis by publication , 2019, Learn. Publ..

[25]  M. Merga,et al.  Typical scope of time commitment and research outputs of Thesis by Publication in Australia , 2020, Higher Education Research & Development.

[26]  Jeanette Taylor,et al.  THE IMPACT OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ON THE WORK OF UNIVERSITY ACADEMICS: EVIDENCE FROM AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES , 2001 .

[27]  Linda Shields,et al.  Content Analysis , 2015 .

[28]  Björn Gustavii,et al.  How to Prepare a Scientific Doctoral Dissertation Based on Research Articles: Compilation – the article-based thesis , 2012 .

[29]  Loan Thi Thuy Nguyen,et al.  Rhetorical Structure of Introduction Chapters written by Novice Vietnamese TESOL postgraduates , 2014 .