Systematic review of definitions and methods of measuring falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials.

OBJECTIVE to review systematically the range of case definitions and methods used to measure falls in randomised controlled trials. DESIGN/METHODS a Cochrane review of fall prevention interventions was used to identify fall definitions in published trials. Secondary searches of various databases were used to identify additional methodological or theoretical papers. Two independent reviewers undertook data extraction, with adjudication by a third reviewer in cases of disagreement. SETTINGS community-dwelling and institutionalised older persons. RESULTS 90 publications met the predefined inclusion criteria. Of these, 44 provided no definition of the term fall. In the remainder, there were substantial variations in the definition and methods of measuring falls. Reporting periods ranged from 1 week to 4 years with only 41% using prospective data collection methods. CONCLUSION the standard of reporting falls in published trials is poor and significantly impedes comparison between studies. The review has been used to inform an international consensus exercise to make recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for fall prevention trials.

[1]  C. Becker,et al.  Development of a Common Outcome Data Set for Fall Injury Prevention Trials: The Prevention of Falls Network Europe Consensus , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[2]  J Hargreaves,et al.  Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction. , 2004, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[3]  Tai Chi, Falls, and the Heritage of JAGS , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Assessment Methods for Patient-Reported Outcomes , 2003 .

[5]  Claire Ballinger,et al.  The construction of the risk of falling among and by older people , 2002, Ageing and Society.

[6]  R. Cumming,et al.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  S. Shinkai,et al.  [A comparison between three methods to investigate falls among the elderly living in the community]. , 2000, [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health.

[8]  N. Peel,et al.  Validating recall of falls by older people. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  R. Cumming,et al.  Interventions for preventing falls in the elderly. , 2000 .

[10]  T F Nelson,et al.  Airbags: an exploratory survey of public knowledge and attitudes. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  [An examination of two reporting methods of falls among the elderly living in the community]. , 1996, [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health.

[12]  M J Lichtenstein,et al.  Falls: An Examination of Three Reporting Methods in Nursing Homes , 1993, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  W A Hale,et al.  Accuracy Of Patient Recall And Chart Documentation Of Falls , 1993, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[14]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Development of the Common Data Base for the FICSIT Trials , 1993, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[15]  P. Lachenbruch,et al.  Adjusting for recall bias with the proportional hazards model. , 1991, Methods of information in medicine.

[16]  J L Kelsey,et al.  Methodologic issues in the study of frequent and recurrent health problems. Falls in the elderly. , 1990, Annals of epidemiology.

[17]  S. Cummings,et al.  Forgetting Falls , 1988, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  Bailey B. Burritt,et al.  The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization , 1946 .

[19]  E. Mayo,et al.  The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. , 1946 .