Molecular classification of solid tumours: towards pathway-driven therapeutics

The last decade has witnessed unprecedented developments in the genetic and epigenetic analyses of solid tumours. Transcriptional and DNA copy-number studies have improved our understanding and classification of solid tumours and highlighted the patterns of genomic aberrations associated with outcome. The identification of altered transcriptional and translational silencing by microRNAs and epigenetic modification by methylation in tumours has showed a layer of additional intricacy to the regulation of gene expression in different tumour types. The advent of massive parallel sequencing has allowed whole cancer genomes to be sequenced with extraordinary speed and accuracy providing insight into the bewildering complexity of gene mutations present in solid tumours. Functional genomic studies using RNA interference-screening tools promises to improve the classification of solid tumours by probing the relevance of each gene to tumour phenotype. In this review, we discuss how these studies have contributed to solid tumour classification and why such studies are central to the future of oncology. We suggest that these developments are gradually leading to a change in emphasis of early clinical trials to a therapeutic model guided by the molecular classification of tumours. The investigation of drug efficacy later in development is beginning to rely on patient selection defined by predictive molecular criteria that complement solid tumour classification based on anatomic site.

[1]  S. Ropero,et al.  A microRNA DNA methylation signature for human cancer metastasis , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Carme Camps,et al.  hsa-miR-210 Is Induced by Hypoxia and Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Review Functional , 2008 .

[5]  E. Korn,et al.  Chromosome Transfer Induced Aneuploidy Results in Complex Dysregulation of the Cellular Transcriptome in Immortalized and Cancer Cells , 2004, Cancer Research.

[6]  Yudi Pawitan,et al.  Improved Grading of Breast Adenocarcinomas Based on Genomic Instability , 2004, Cancer Research.

[7]  Charles D. Johnson,et al.  Genome-scale microRNA and small interfering RNA screens identify small RNA modulators of TRAIL-induced apoptosis pathway. , 2007, Cancer research.

[8]  A. Nobel,et al.  Gene expression profiles do not consistently predict the clinical treatment response in locally advanced breast cancer , 2006, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[9]  V. Moreno,et al.  Genetic pathways and genome-wide determinants of clinical outcome in colorectal cancer. , 2003, Cancer research.

[10]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Core Signaling Pathways in Human Pancreatic Cancers Revealed by Global Genomic Analyses , 2008, Science.

[11]  I. Ellis,et al.  An immune response gene expression module identifies a good prognosis subtype in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer , 2007, Genome Biology.

[12]  L. Ein-Dor,et al.  Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways , 2008, Nature.

[14]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[15]  C. Caldas,et al.  Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  The Consensus Coding Sequences of Human Breast and Colorectal Cancers , 2006, Science.

[17]  H. Dressman,et al.  Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics , 2006, Nature Medicine.

[18]  R. Bernards,et al.  Enabling personalized cancer medicine through analysis of gene-expression patterns , 2008, Nature.

[19]  A. Harris,et al.  REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[20]  Paul A Clemons,et al.  The Connectivity Map: Using Gene-Expression Signatures to Connect Small Molecules, Genes, and Disease , 2006, Science.

[21]  T. Hirano,et al.  Relationship between chromosomal instability and intratumoral regional DNA ploidy heterogeneity in primary gastric cancers. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[22]  S. Tavaré,et al.  High-resolution aCGH and expression profiling identifies a novel genomic subtype of ER negative breast cancer , 2007, Genome Biology.

[23]  C. Swanton,et al.  Chromosomal Instability, Colorectal Cancer and Taxane Resistance , 2006, Cell cycle.

[24]  P. Duesberg,et al.  Explaining the high mutation rates of cancer cells to drug and multidrug resistance by chromosome reassortments that are catalyzed by aneuploidy. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Nevins,et al.  Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[26]  R. Houlston,et al.  Association between chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis , 2008, Gut.

[27]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[28]  Ru-Fang Yeh,et al.  miR-126 regulates angiogenic signaling and vascular integrity. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[29]  I. Kirsch,et al.  Targeting Cancer Cells by Exploiting Karyotypic Complexity and Chromosomal Instability , 2005, Cell cycle.

[30]  Yunqing Li,et al.  microRNA-7 inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor and the Akt pathway and is down-regulated in glioblastoma. , 2008, Cancer research.

[31]  Sung-Liang Yu,et al.  MicroRNA signature predicts survival and relapse in lung cancer. , 2008, Cancer cell.

[32]  Leonard D. Goldstein,et al.  MicroRNA expression profiling of human breast cancer identifies new markers of tumor subtype , 2007, Genome Biology.

[33]  Igor Jurisica,et al.  Gene expression–based survival prediction in lung adenocarcinoma: a multi-site, blinded validation study , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[34]  R. Aharonov,et al.  MicroRNAs accurately identify cancer tissue origin , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  D. Busam,et al.  An Integrated Genomic Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2008, Science.

[36]  H. Horvitz,et al.  MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers , 2005, Nature.

[37]  John W M Martens,et al.  Four miRNAs associated with aggressiveness of lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  J. Brenton,et al.  Regulators of mitotic arrest and ceramide metabolism are determinants of sensitivity to paclitaxel and other chemotherapeutic drugs. , 2007, Cancer cell.