Prospective risk analysis prior to retrospective incident reporting and analysis as a means to enhance incident reporting behaviour: a quasi-experimental field study.

Hospitals can apply prospective and retrospective methods to reduce the large number of medical errors. Retrospective methods are used to identify errors after they occur and to facilitate learning. Prospective methods aim to determine, assess and minimise risks before incidents happen. This paper questions whether the order of implementation of those two methods influences the resultant impact on incident reporting behaviour. From November 2007 until June 2008, twelve wards of two Dutch general hospitals participated in a quasi-experimental reversed-treatment non-equivalent control group design. The six units of Hospital 1 first conducted a prospective analysis, after which a sophisticated incident reporting and analysis system was implemented. On the six units of Hospital 2 the two methods were implemented in reverse order. Data from the incident reporting and analysis system and from a questionnaire were used to assess between-hospital differences regarding the number of reported incidents, the spectrum of reported incident types, and the profession of reporters. The results show that carrying out a prospective analysis first can improve incident reporting behaviour in terms of a wider spectrum of reported incident types and a larger proportion of incidents reported by doctors. However, the proposed order does not necessarily yield a larger number of reported incidents. This study fills an important gap in safety management research regarding the order of the implementation of prospective and retrospective methods, and contributes to literature on incident reporting. This research also builds on the network theory of social contagion. The results might indicate that health care employees can disseminate their risk perceptions through communication with their direct colleagues.

[1]  S. Tardieu,et al.  Iatrogenic events in admitted neonates: a prospective cohort study , 2008, The Lancet.

[2]  H Kaplan,et al.  Incident reporting: science or protoscience? Ten years later , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[3]  Sue M. Evans,et al.  Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[4]  J. Waring,et al.  Beyond blame: cultural barriers to medical incident reporting. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[5]  D. Linkin,et al.  Applicability of Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to healthcare epidemiology: evaluation of the sterilization and use of surgical instruments. , 2005, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  C. W. Johnson,et al.  How will we get the data and what will we do with it then? Issues in the reporting of adverse healthcare events , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[7]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  Sue M. Evans,et al.  Evaluation of an intervention aimed at improving voluntary incident reporting in hospitals , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[9]  Sue M. Evans,et al.  Attitudes of doctors and nurses towards incident reporting: a qualitative analysis , 2004, The Medical journal of Australia.

[10]  Pascal Bonnabry,et al.  Use of a prospective risk analysis method to improve the safety of the cancer chemotherapy process. , 2006, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[11]  A. Edmondson Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[12]  Brooks C. Holtom,et al.  Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research , 2008 .

[13]  J W Senders,et al.  FMEA and RCA: the mantras*; of modern risk management , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[14]  R. Hyman Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Book) , 1982 .

[15]  R. Thomson,et al.  What can we learn about patient safety from information sources within an acute hospital: a step on the ladder of integrated risk management? , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[16]  Hichang Cho,et al.  A Social Network Contagion Theory of Risk Perception , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Hoangmai H Pham,et al.  What is driving hospitals' patient-safety efforts? , 2004, Health affairs.

[18]  Merrilyn Walton,et al.  Safety and Ethics in Healthcare: A Guide to Getting it Right , 2007 .

[19]  Kurt R. Herzer,et al.  Designing and Implementing a Comprehensive Quality and Patient Safety Management Model: A Paradigm for Perioperative Improvement , 2008 .

[20]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Failing to Learn and Learning to Fail (Intelligently): How Great Organizations Put Failure to Work to Innovate and Improve , 2005 .

[21]  Charles Vincent,et al.  Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a place , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[22]  J Ralph,et al.  The frustrating case of incident- reporting systems , 2008 .

[23]  E. N. Corlett,et al.  Evaluation of Human Work , 2005 .

[24]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Risk + barriers = safety? , 2008 .

[25]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Confronting Failure: Antecedents and Consequences of Shared Beliefs About Failure in Organizational Work Groups , 2001 .

[26]  P. Barach,et al.  Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  A. R. Hale Safety management in production , 2003 .

[28]  M. M. P. Habraken,et al.  Prospective risk analysis of health care processes: A systematic evaluation of the use of HFMEA™ in Dutch health care , 2009, Ergonomics.

[29]  W. Runciman,et al.  An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[30]  P. Aspden Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care , 2004 .

[31]  C. Holzmueller,et al.  Using Incident Reporting to Improve Patient Safety: A Conceptual Model , 2007 .

[32]  Bryan R. Cole,et al.  Barriers to Implementation of Patient Safety Systems in Healthcare Institutions: Leadership and Policy Implications , 2005 .

[33]  James B Battles,et al.  Sensemaking of patient safety risks and hazards. , 2006, Health services research.

[34]  R J Lilford,et al.  Organizing patient safety research to identify risks and hazards , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[35]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[36]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  A Review of Medical Error Reporting System Design Considerations and a Proposed Cross-Level Systems Research Framework , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[37]  P. Hudson,et al.  Applying the lessons of high risk industries to health care , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[38]  R. Helmreich On error management: lessons from aviation , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  Susan M Paddock,et al.  Rates and types of events reported to established incident reporting systems in two US hospitals , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[40]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  A proactive approach to human error detection and identification in aviation and air traffic control , 2009 .

[41]  van der Tw Tjerk Schaaf,et al.  Systems for near miss reporting and analysis , 2005 .

[42]  A. Fenton,et al.  Towards safer neonatal transfer: the importance of critical incident review , 2005, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[43]  G. G. M. Cojazzi,et al.  Biases in incident reporting databases : An empirical study in the chemical process industry , 2008 .