Culturing reality: How organic chemistry graduate students develop into practitioners

Although one of the presumed aims of graduate training programs is to help students develop into practitioners of their chosen fields, very little is known about how this transition occurs. In the course of studying how graduate students learn to solve organic synthesis problems, we were able to identify some of the key factors in the epistemic development from student to practitioner. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four first-year organic chemistry graduate students enrolled in a course on organic synthesis and two third-year organic chemistry graduate students who were in the process of preparing an original research proposal in organic synthesis as a component of their Ph.D. oral qualifying exams. Three interconnected factors that fostered the students' development into practicing organic chemists were identified: (1) the students needed to perceive the material they were asked to learn in the course lectures and in other interactions with the professor as “real;” (2) they needed to work on authentic activities that provided concrete instruments for knowledge construction; and (3) the students needed scaffolding with a more-knowledgeable other in the form of feedback on the authentic activity. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 51: 694–713, 2014

[1]  E. Corey,et al.  The Logic of Chemical Synthesis , 1989 .

[2]  M. Stieff,et al.  Six Myths About Spatial Thinking , 2012 .

[3]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[5]  Wayne Jacobson.  Learning, Culture, and Learning Culture , 1996 .

[6]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Problem‐solving processes used by students in organic synthesis , 1991 .

[7]  V. Talanquer,et al.  College chemistry students' mental models of acids and acid strength , 2011 .

[8]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Making sense of the arrow-pushing formalism among chemistry majors enrolled in organic chemistry , 2008 .

[9]  Deborah Brandt,et al.  The Cognitive as the Social , 1992 .

[10]  Adam Kraft,et al.  Reasonable reasoning: multi-variate problem-solving in organic chemistry , 2010 .

[11]  Susan Budavari,et al.  The Merck index : an encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals , 1983 .

[12]  Jeffrey R. Raker,et al.  Designing undergraduate-level organic chemistry instructional problems: Seven ideas from a problem-solving study of practicing synthetic organic chemists , 2012 .

[13]  Margaret Anzul,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research: Circles Within Circles , 1991 .

[14]  J. Anderson,et al.  How Do Organic Chemistry Students Understand and Apply Hydrogen Bonding , 2001 .

[15]  Perry’s Scheme of Intellectual and Epistemological Development as a framework for describing student difficulties in learning organic chemistry , 2010 .

[16]  V. Talanquer,et al.  Modes of reasoning in self-initiated study groups in chemistry , 2012 .

[17]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[18]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[19]  George M. Bodner,et al.  The Many Forms of Constructivism , 2001 .

[20]  Susan Carey,et al.  On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .

[21]  F. Marton.  Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[22]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .

[23]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[24]  Robert Neilson Boyd,et al.  Organic Chemistry 2nd Ed. , 1956 .

[25]  R. Kozma,et al.  The Roles of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their Implications for Chemistry Learning , 2000 .

[26]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Contextual epistemic development in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists , 2006 .

[27]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[28]  Matthew E. May.  The Elegant Solution: Toyota's Formula for Mastering Innovation , 2006 .

[29]  Stacey Lowery Bretz,et al.  A continuum of learning: from rote memorization to meaningful learning in organic chemistry , 2012 .

[30]  K. Lewin,et al.  Resolving Social Conflicts , 1948 .

[31]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[32]  George M. Bodner,et al.  PROBLEM-SOLVING PROCESSES USED BY GRADUATE STUDENTS WHILE SOLVING TASKS IN ORGANIC SYNTHESIS , 1991 .

[33]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  Should Great Lakes City Build a New Power Plant? How Youth Navigate Socioscientific Issues , 2012 .

[34]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Spatial Ability and its Role in Organic Chemistry: A Study of Four Organic Courses. , 1987 .

[35]  Joseph J. Schwab.  The Practical: A Language for Curriculum , 1969, The School Review.

[36]  Mary A. LaRussa,et al.  A STUDY OF TWO MEASURES OF SPATIAL ABILITY AS PREDICTORS OF SUCCESS IN DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY , 1987 .

[37]  Gautam Bhattacharyya,et al.  "It Gets Me to the Product": How Students Propose Organic Mechanisms , 2005 .

[38]  Scott E. Lewis,et al.  Alternative conceptions of organic chemistry topics among fourth year chemistry students , 2008 .

[39]  K. Leiter,et al.  A Primer of Ethnomethodology , 1980 .

[40]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[41]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Non-mathematical problem solving in organic chemistry , 2009 .

[42]  C. W. Bowen,et al.  Representational Systems Used by Graduate Students while Problem Solving in Organic Synthesis. , 1990 .

[43]  Stacey Lowery Bretz,et al.  Impact of a spiral organic curriculum on student attrition and learning , 2008 .

[44]  G. Bodner,et al.  Research and practice in chemical education in advanced courses , 2008 .

[45]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[46]  Adam Kraft,et al.  What happens when representations fail to represent? Graduate students’ mental models of organic chemistry diagrams , 2010 .

[47]  C. Seale,et al.  Quality in Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[48]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[49]  G. Bodner,et al.  What can we do about ‘Parker’? A case study of a good student who didn't ‘get’ organic chemistry , 2008 .

[50]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science , 2013 .

[51]  G. Bodner.  Constructivism: A theory of knowledge , 1986 .

[52]  David P. Cartrette,et al.  Students' understanding of acids/bases in organic chemistry contexts , 2011 .

[53]  Practitioner development in organic chemistry: how graduate students conceptualize organic acids , 2006 .

[54]  Jeffrey R. Raker,et al.  Problem types in synthetic organic chemistry research: Implications for the development of curricular problems for second-year level organic chemistry instruction , 2012 .

[55]  E. Glasersfeld.  Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching , 1989 .

[56]  W. G. Perry.  Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[57]  P. Cobb.  Where Is the Mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development , 1994 .