Information Systems as Representations: A Review of the Theory and Evidence

Representation theory proposes that the basic purpose of an information system (IS) is to faithfully represent certain real-world phenomena, allowing users to reason about these phenomena more cost-effectively than if they were observed directly. Over the past three decades, the theory has underpinned much research on conceptual modeling in IS analysis and design and, increasingly, research on other IS phenomena such as data quality, system alignment, IS security, and system use. The original theory has also inspired further development of its core premises and advances in methodological guidelines to improve its use and evaluation. Nonetheless, the theory has attracted repeated criticisms regarding its validity, relevance, usefulness, and robustness. Given the burgeoning literature on the theory over time, both positive and negative, the time is ripe for a narrative, developmental review. We review representation theory, examine how it has been used, and critically evaluate its contributions and limitations. Based on our findings, we articulate a set of recommendations for improving its application, development, testing, and evaluation.

[1]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[2]  Boris Wyssusek,et al.  Ontology and Ontologies in Information Systems Analysis and Design: A Critique , 2004, AMCIS.

[3]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1999 .

[4]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Big Data and Management , 2014 .

[5]  Marta Indulska,et al.  The ontological deficiencies of process modeling in practice , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.

[7]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Extending Representational Analysis: BPMN User and Developer Perspectives , 2007, BPM.

[8]  Ron Weber,et al.  An Ontological Analysis of some Fundamental Information Systems Concepts , 1988, ICIS.

[9]  Ron Weber,et al.  Mario Bunge's ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts , 1990 .

[10]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Using Meta Models for the Comparison of Ontologies , 2003 .

[11]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  What do the pictures mean? Guidelines for experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[12]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  An Ontology of Data Modeling Languages: A Study Using a Common-Sense Realistic Ontology , 2004, J. Database Manag..

[13]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Toward a Social Ontology for Conceptual Modeling , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Peter Green Use of Information Systems Analysis and Design (ISAD) Grammars in Combination in Upper Case Tools - An Ontological Evaluation. , 1997 .

[15]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  The Hole in the Whole: A Response to Allen and March , 2012, MIS Q..

[16]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Jan Recker,et al.  Ontology- Versus Pattern-Based Evaluation of Process Modeling Languages: A Comparison , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Gabriella Spinelli,et al.  Applying Wand and Weber's Surface and Deep Structure Approaches to Financial Reporting Systems , 2012 .

[19]  Peter Kreiner,et al.  The prescription opioid and heroin crisis: a public health approach to an epidemic of addiction. , 2015, Annual review of public health.

[20]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  The Publish or Perish Book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis , 2010 .

[21]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Exploring the Role of Application and IS Domain Knowledge , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: institutional and ontological structures , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Do Ontological Deficiencies in Modeling Grammars Matter? , 2011, MIS Q..

[24]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Human and automatic modularizations of process models to enhance their comprehension , 2011, Inf. Syst..

[25]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[26]  Giuseppe Berio,et al.  New perspectives in ontological analysis: Guidelines and rules for incorporating modelling languages into UEML , 2012, Inf. Syst..

[27]  Steven W. Floyd,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. , 1989 .

[28]  Raul Valverde,et al.  An Extension Proposition for the Agent-Based Language Modeling Ontology for the Representation of Supply Chain Integrated Business Processes , 2015 .

[29]  Peter Loos,et al.  Ontological Analysis of Reference Models , 2005 .

[30]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Modularity in Process Models: Review and Effects , 2008, BPM.

[31]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Using ontology for the representational analysis of process modelling techniques , 2009, Int. J. Bus. Process. Integr. Manag..

[32]  Ludwig Christian Schaupp,et al.  Identifying Ontological Modifications to the Resource-Event-Agent (REA) Enterprise Ontology Using a Bunge-Wand-Weber Ontological Evaluation , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Boris Wyssusek,et al.  On Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modelling , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[35]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  Zhuozhi Chen,et al.  Domain Modeling for Enterprise Information Systems - Formalizing and Extending Zachman Framework Using BWW Ontology , 2009, 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering.

[37]  Ron Weber,et al.  An Ontological Model of an Information System , 1990, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[38]  Jörg Becker,et al.  On the Transition from Computation Independent to Platform Independent Models , 2006, AMCIS.

[39]  Arvind W. Kiwelekar,et al.  Ontological interpretation of object-oriented programming abstractions , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM).

[40]  Jan Recker,et al.  The measurement of perceived ontological deficiencies of conceptual modeling grammars , 2010, Data Knowl. Eng..

[41]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the deep structure of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[42]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Vive les differences? Developing a profile of European information systems research as a basis for international comparisons , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Ron Weber,et al.  An Ontological Evaluation of Systems Analysis and Design Methods , 1989, ISCO.

[44]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.

[45]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design , 2015, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[46]  Ulrich Frank,et al.  Domain-Specific Modeling Languages: Requirements Analysis and Design Guidelines , 2013, Domain Engineering, Product Lines, Languages, and Conceptual Models.

[47]  Ron Weber,et al.  Conceptual Modelling and Ontology: Possibilities and Pitfalls , 2002, ER.

[48]  Kalle Lyytinen "Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modelling" by Boris Wyssusek - a Critical Response , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  Clinical care management and workflow by episodes , 1997, AMIA.

[51]  Joerg Evermann,et al.  Guidelines for using UML association classes and their effect on domain understanding in requirements engineering , 2012, Requirements Engineering.

[52]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  Ontological Foundations of Representational Information Systems , 2007 .

[53]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  Interpreting Deep Structures of Information Systems Security , 2012, Comput. J..

[54]  Grazyna Paliwoda-Pekosz,et al.  Comparing Benefits from Enterprise System Adoption in Transition and Developed Economies: An Ontology-based Approach , 2013, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[55]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  The Effects of State-Based and Event-Based Data Representation on User Performance in Query Formulation Tasks , 2006, MIS Q..

[56]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[57]  L. Weed Medical records that guide and teach. , 1968, The New England journal of medicine.

[58]  Yair Wand,et al.  Guidelines for Designing Visual Ontologies to Support Knowledge Identification , 2011, MIS Q..

[59]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Are We There Yet-Seamless Mapping of BPMN to BPEL4WS , 2007, AMCIS.

[60]  Stephen R. Rockwell,et al.  COGEVAL: Applying Cognitive Theories to Evaluate Conceptual Models , 2005 .

[61]  Zhuozhi Chen,et al.  Rediscovering Zachman Framework Using Ontology from a Requirement Engineering Perspective , 2009, 2009 33rd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference.

[62]  P. Godfrey‐Smith Theory and reality : an introduction to the philosophy of science , 2003 .

[63]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001 , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[64]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Evaluating the quality of information models: empirical testing of a conceptual model quality framework , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[65]  Yanchun Zhang,et al.  An analytical evaluation of NIAM'S grammar for conceptual schema diagrams , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..

[66]  K. Tarapanoff,et al.  In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power: Shoshana Zuboff. Oxford: Heinemann professional publishing Ltd, 1988. 468 pp. ISBN 0 434 92486 5. £16.95 , 1990 .

[67]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Ontological Evaluation of the UML Using the Bunge–Wand–Weber Model , 2002, Software and Systems Modeling.

[68]  Jan Recker Evaluations of Process Modeling Grammars - Ontological, Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses Using the Example of BPMN , 2011, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.

[69]  Maria-Eugenia Iacob,et al.  Feasibility of EPC to BPEL Model Transformations Based on Ontology and Patterns , 2009, Business Process Management Workshops.

[70]  Ron Weber,et al.  Understanding relationships with attributes in entity-relationship diagrams , 1999, ICIS.

[71]  Peter Rittgen,et al.  A language-mapping approach to action-oriented development of information systems , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Complementary Use of Modeling Grammars , 2011, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[73]  Marija Bjekovic,et al.  Embracing Pragmatics , 2014, ER.

[74]  D. Strong,et al.  Affordance theory and how to use it in IS research , 2017 .

[75]  Csaba Veres,et al.  Cognition and Modeling: Foundations for Research and Practice , 2005 .

[76]  Stephen Child,et al.  How many health professionals does a patient see during an average hospital stay? , 2007, The New Zealand medical journal.

[77]  Ron Weber,et al.  Alignment in Enterprise Systems Implementations: The Role of Ontological Distance , 2004, ICIS.

[78]  Robert M. Colomb,et al.  A perdurant ontology for interoperating information systems based on interlocking institutional worlds , 2010, Appl. Ontology.

[79]  Jon Heales,et al.  A model of factors affecting an information system's change in state , 2002, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[80]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  A Research Note on Representing Part-Whole Relations in Conceptual Modeling , 2012, MIS Q..

[81]  Soonjae Kwon,et al.  Conceptual modeling of causal map: Object oriented causal map , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[82]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  The Foundation Role for Theories of Agency in Understanding Information Systems Design , 2002, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[83]  Raimundas Matulevicius,et al.  An Extension of Business Process Model and Notation for Security Risk Management , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des..

[84]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[85]  Nevine El-Tawy,et al.  Some thoughts on the recognition of assets, notably in respect of intangible assets , 2013 .

[86]  Stefan Strohmeier,et al.  Conceptual Modeling in Human Resource Management: A Design Research Approach , 2017, AIS Trans. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[87]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Towards an enhanced methodology for ontological analyses , 2004 .

[88]  Wolfgang Marquardt,et al.  An ontological conceptualization of multiscale models , 2009, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[89]  Yair Wand,et al.  Analyzing Variability of Software Product Lines Using Semantic and Ontological Considerations , 2014, CAiSE.

[90]  Peter Meso,et al.  Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[91]  John R. Searle,et al.  Social ontology , 2006 .

[92]  Werner Esswein,et al.  Ontological Analyses Reconsidered-A Formal Approach , 2005 .

[93]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Ontological evaluation of enterprise systems interoperability using ebXML , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[94]  Jan Recker,et al.  Evaluation of Conceptual Modeling Languages: An Epistemological Discussion , 2005, AMCIS.

[95]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Modeling languages for business processes and business rules: A representational analysis , 2009, Inf. Syst..

[96]  Robert Singer,et al.  User Centered Development of Agent-based Business Process Models and Notations , 2014, ArXiv.

[97]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  Research Commentary - Too Big to Fail: Large Samples and the p-Value Problem , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[98]  Fiona H. Rohde An Ontological Evaluation of Jackson's System Development Model , 1995, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[99]  Adam Wright,et al.  Clinician attitudes toward and use of electronic problem lists: a thematic analysis , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[100]  Yair Wand,et al.  Goal-Driven Multi-Process Analysis , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[101]  C. Ruland,et al.  The Chronic Care Model and Technological Research and Innovation: A Scoping Review at the Crossroads , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[102]  Andreas L. Opdahl,et al.  Extending the UML Statecharts Notation to Model Security Aspects , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[103]  Ron Weber,et al.  On Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modelling: A Response to Wyssusek , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[104]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Sometimes Less is More: Are Process Modeling Languages Overly Complex? , 2007, 2007 Eleventh International IEEE EDOC Conference Workshop.

[105]  Ron Weber,et al.  Guidelines for Empirical Evaluations of Conceptual Modeling Grammars , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[106]  Daniel R. Dolk,et al.  Design Principles for Virtual Worlds , 2011, MIS Q..

[107]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  The Impact of Conceptual Modeling on Dataset Completeness: A Field Experiment , 2014, ICIS.

[108]  Irit Hadar,et al.  Variations in Conceptual Modeling: Classification and Ontological Analysis , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[109]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[110]  Andreas L. Opdahl,et al.  Comparing GRL and KAOS using the UEML Approach , 2007, IESA.

[111]  Susana I. Herrera,et al.  Ontological Modelling of Information Systems from Bunge's Contributions , 2005, CAiSE Workshops.

[112]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Representing things and properties in conceptual modelling: an empirical evaluation , 2003, ECIS.

[113]  Ron Weber,et al.  Stakeholder experiences with conceptual modeling: an empirical investigation , 1998, ICIS '98.

[114]  Andreas L. Opdahl,et al.  Response to Wyssusek's "On Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modelling" , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[115]  Devin M. Mann,et al.  Problem-oriented charting: A review , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[116]  Chengqi Zhang,et al.  Data preparation for data mining , 2003, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[117]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Business Process Modeling- A Comparative Analysis , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[118]  Arash Saghafi,et al.  Do Ontological Guidelines Improve Understandability of Conceptual Models? A Meta-analysis of Empirical Work , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[119]  Cd Keen,et al.  An analysis of the design constructs required in process modelling , 1996, Proceedings 1996 International Conference Software Engineering: Education and Practice.

[120]  Christian S. Jensen,et al.  On the Ontological Expressiveness of Temporal Extensions to the Entity-Relationship Model , 1999, ER.

[121]  Ron Weber,et al.  Toward a Theory of the Deep Structure of Information Systems , 1990, ICIS.

[122]  Yair Wand,et al.  Comparing functionality of software systems: An ontological approach , 2013, Data Knowl. Eng..

[123]  Yair Wand,et al.  Role and Request Based Conceptual Modeling - A Methodology and a CASE Tool , 2008, CAiSE Forum.

[124]  John Krogstie,et al.  Model-Based Development and Evolution of Information Systems , 2012, Springer London.

[125]  Pär J. Ågerfalk Getting pragmatic , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[126]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management framework , 2003, Inf. Syst..

[127]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Living IT infrastructures - An ontology-based approach to aligning IT infrastructure capacity and business needs , 2014, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[128]  Guy Paré,et al.  Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[129]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Understanding the Semantics of Data Provenance to Support Active Conceptual Modeling , 2006, Active Conceptual Modeling of Learning.

[130]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Integrated Process Modeling: An Ontological Evaluation , 2000, Inf. Syst..

[131]  Andrew Gemino,et al.  Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[132]  Ron Weber,et al.  Ontological foundations of information systems , 1997 .

[133]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Analyzing and Comparing Ontologies with Meta-Models , 2005 .

[134]  CD Keen,et al.  INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODELLING USING LOOPN++, AN OBJECT PETRI NET SCHEME , 2007 .

[135]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Candidate interoperability standards: An ontological overlap analysis , 2007, Data Knowl. Eng..

[136]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Integrating multi-perspective views into ontological analysis , 2000, ICIS.

[137]  Yair Wand,et al.  Goal-Driven Analysis of Process Model Validity , 2004, CAiSE.

[138]  Lynne Pearce A prescription. , 2003, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[139]  Marta Indulska,et al.  A Reference Methodology for Conducting Ontological Analyses , 2004, ER.

[140]  Giuseppe Berio,et al.  An ontology for enterprise and information systems modelling , 2012, Appl. Ontology.

[141]  WetzelsMartin,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2007 .

[142]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  Analyzing and Comparing Ontologies with Meta-Methods , 2005, Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies.

[143]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[144]  J. Searle Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization , 2010 .

[145]  Andreas L. Opdahl Anatomy of the Unified Enterprise Modelling Ontology , 2011, IWEI.

[146]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: does MIS have native theories? , 2012 .

[147]  MSc Mbcs CEng Michael Bronzite BSc System Development , 2000, Springer London.

[148]  RosemannMichael,et al.  Integrated process modeling , 2000 .

[149]  Leyland F. Pitt,et al.  Potential Research Space in MIS: A Framework for Envisioning and Evaluating Research Replication, Extension, and Generation , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[150]  Yair Wand,et al.  Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[151]  T. Bowler TREATISE ON BASIC PHILOSOPHY, VOLUME 4, ONTOLOGY II: A WORLD OF SYSTEMS, Mario Bunge, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston, 1979. 291 pp. , 1980 .

[152]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Ontological analysis of whole-part relationships in OO-models , 2001, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[153]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods , 2003, ECIS.

[154]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Situated Action: Reply to Reviewers , 1993, Cognitive Sciences.

[155]  Mohan S. Kankanhalli,et al.  Multimedia data mining: state of the art and challenges , 2010, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[156]  Sankalp Khanna,et al.  The National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) and the 4‐hour rule: time to review the target , 2016, The Medical journal of Australia.

[157]  Ron Weber,et al.  Ontological Clarity, Cognitive Engagement, and Conceptual Model Quality Evaluation: An Experimental Investigation , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[158]  Yair Wand,et al.  Research Note - How Semantics and Pragmatics Interact in Understanding Conceptual Models , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[159]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Grounding the OML metamodel in ontology , 2001, J. Syst. Softw..

[160]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[161]  Csaba Veres,et al.  Using Psychology To Understand Conceptual Modelling , 2002, ECIS.

[162]  Jeffrey Parsons An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representing Property Precedence on the Comprehension of Conceptual Schemas , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[163]  Alain Wegmann,et al.  Defining early IT system requirements with regulation principles: the Lightswitch approach , 2004, Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2004..

[164]  Yair Wand,et al.  Attribute-Based Semantic Reconciliation of Multiple Data Sources , 2003, J. Data Semant..

[165]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Challenging the Philosophical Foundations of Modeling Organizational Reality: The Case of Process Modeling , 2013, ICIS.

[166]  Jan Recker,et al.  Epistemological perspectives on ontology-based theories for conceptual modeling , 2008, Appl. Ontology.

[167]  A Thomas McLellan,et al.  Opioid Abuse in Chronic Pain--Misconceptions and Mitigation Strategies. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[168]  Helen Kelley,et al.  Research Commentary - Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects - A Reflection on Our Practices and Recommendations for Future Research , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[169]  Ron Weber,et al.  Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[170]  Keng Siau,et al.  The Psychology of Information Modeling , 2002, Advanced Topics in Database Research, Vol. 1.

[171]  Andreas L. Opdahl,et al.  Facet Modelling: An Approach to Flexible and Integrated Conceptual Modelling , 1997, Inf. Syst..

[172]  Zahir Tari,et al.  An Analytical Framework for Evaluating Service-Oriented Software Development Methodologies , 2013, J. Softw..

[173]  Yair Wand,et al.  On the notion of soft-goals in business process modeling , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[174]  Lior Limonad,et al.  What ‘good’ looks like: Understanding records ontologically in the context of the global financial crisis , 2011, J. Inf. Sci..

[175]  Peter Meso,et al.  How Good Are These UML Diagrams? An Empirical Test of the Wand and Weber Good Decomposition Model , 2002, ICIS.

[176]  Joerg Evermann,et al.  Ontology based object-oriented domain modelling: fundamental concepts , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[177]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  A Template for Defining Enterprise Modeling Constructs , 2004, J. Database Manag..

[178]  Peter Meso,et al.  The Effects of Decomposition Quality and Multiple Forms of Information on Novices' Understanding of a Domain from a Conceptual Model , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[179]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Enhancing the Expressiveness of the Bunge-Wand-Weber Ontology , 2005, AMCIS.

[180]  Mario Piattini,et al.  A conceptual modeling quality framework , 2011, Software Quality Journal.

[181]  Peter Loos,et al.  Semantic Business Process Management: Ontology-Based Process Modeling Using Event-Driven Process Chains , 2007, Int. J. Interoperability Bus. Inf. Syst..

[182]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Developing a meta model for the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontological constructs , 2002, Inf. Syst..

[183]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Representing part-whole relations in conceptual modeling: an empirical evaluation , 2008 .

[184]  Boris Wyssusek,et al.  On the Foundation of the Ontological Foundation of Conceptual Modeling Grammars: The Construction of the Bunge-Wand-Weber Ontology , 2005, CAiSE Workshops.

[185]  Colette Rolland,et al.  Measuring the fitness relationship , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[186]  Ron Weber,et al.  Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[187]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Assessing Representation Theory with a Framework for Pursuing Success and Failure , 2017, MIS Q..

[188]  H. James Nelson,et al.  Ensuring the quality of conceptual representations , 2007, Software Quality Journal.

[189]  Sean W. Smith,et al.  Healthcare information technology's relativity problems: a typology of how patients' physical reality, clinicians' mental models, and healthcare information technology differ , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[190]  Yair Wand,et al.  An Automated Approach to Information Systems Decomposition , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[191]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[192]  Ron Weber,et al.  Improving the Semantics of Conceptual-Modeling Grammars: A New Perspective on an Old Problem , 2013, ICIS.

[193]  Geert Poels,et al.  Ontology-driven conceptual modeling: A systematic literature mapping and review , 2015, Appl. Ontology.

[194]  ModelsAndreas L OpdahlDept Multi-Perspective Modelling of Requirements : A Case Study Using Facet , 2007 .

[195]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Representing Classes of Things and Properties in General in Conceptual Modelling: An Empirical Evaluation , 2010, J. Database Manag..

[196]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  How Can We Develop Contextualized Theories of Effective Use? A Demonstration in the Context of Community-Care Electronic Health Records , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[197]  Marta Indulska,et al.  How good is BPMN really? Insights from theory and practice , 2006, ECIS.

[198]  Pericles Loucopoulos,et al.  A Unified View of Business Process Modelling Languages 1 , 2013 .

[199]  Guy Paré,et al.  A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[200]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  Uniting emergency and inpatient clinicians across the ED–inpatient interface: The last frontier? , 2017, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[201]  Huibert Tange,et al.  Moving From Problem-Oriented to Goal-Directed Health Records , 2018, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[202]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Situated Action: A Symbolic Interpretation , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[203]  Paul O'Brien,et al.  Ubiquitous Travel Service Delivery , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Tour..

[204]  Mohammed Odeh,et al.  Blueprint of a Semantic Business Process-Aware Enterprise Information Architecture: The EIAOnt Ontology , 2013, ICEIS.

[205]  Peter Rhea Jones,et al.  Biblical Hermeneutics , 1975 .

[206]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Measuring Method Complexity: UML versus BPMN , 2009, AMCIS.

[207]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Reclaiming meaning in IS theory: Theory for why, not what , 2014 .

[208]  B. Nurcombe,et al.  Goal-directed treatment planning and the principles of brief hospitalization. , 1989, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[209]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Understanding Organization-Enterprise System Fit: A Path to Theorizing the Information Technology Artifact , 2010, MIS Q..

[210]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[211]  Andrew Gemino,et al.  Empirical comparisons of animation and narration in requirements validation , 2004, Requirements Engineering.

[212]  Babis Theodoulidis,et al.  Building autonomic computing systems based on ontological component models and a controller synthesis algorithm , 2003, 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2003. Proceedings..

[213]  Christos Goumopoulos,et al.  Achieving Co-Operation and Developing Smart Behavior in Collections of Context-Aware Artifacts , 2008 .

[214]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating Conceptual Modelling Practices: Composites, Things, Properties , 2005 .

[215]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Exploring proposed ontological issues of ARIS with different categories of modellers , 2004 .

[216]  Carson C. Woo,et al.  Investigating business-IT alignment through multi-disciplinary goal concepts , 2009, Requirements Engineering.

[217]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A Replication Manifesto , 2014, AIS Trans. Replication Res..

[218]  Geert Poels,et al.  Integrating the semantics of events, processes and tasks across requirements engineering layers , 2010, CAiSE 2010.

[219]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[220]  Jan Recker,et al.  Construct Redundancy In Process Modelling Grammars: Improving The Explanatory Power Of Ontological Analysis , 2013, ECIS.

[221]  Mario Piattini,et al.  Defining and validating metrics for assessing the understandability of entity-relationship diagrams , 2008, Data Knowl. Eng..

[222]  Pat Langley,et al.  Selection of Relevant Features and Examples in Machine Learning , 1997, Artif. Intell..