Continuous monitoring of long‐term outcomes with application to hip prostheses

The CUSUM continuous monitoring method could be a valuable tool in evaluating the performance (revision experience) of prostheses used in hip replacement surgery. The dilemma when applying the CUSUM in this context is the choice of statistical model for the outcome (revision). The Bernoulli model is perhaps the most straightforward approach but the Poisson model is a plausible, and could be argued, preferable alternative for long-term outcomes such as this, provided the rate of revision with time from surgery can be assumed to be constant. However, a rate (or hazard) varying according to the Weibull distribution appears to be a better representation of a prosthesis lifetime. We show how to adapt the Poisson approach to allow for the hazard to vary according to the Weibull model as well as other parametric survival models. Application to data on a known poorly performing prosthesis shows both the Poisson and Weibull CUSUMs could have given early warning of the poor performance, with the Weibull chart alerting before the Poisson. Simulation work to investigate the robustness of the Poisson and Weibull CUSUM to departures from the underlying survival model highlights the need for correct specification of the model for the outcome.

[1]  M. Caputo,et al.  Control chart methods for monitoring cardiac surgical performance and their interpretation. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  O Johnell,et al.  Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid? A comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  Tim Friede,et al.  Intervention effects in observational survival studies with an application in total hip replacements. , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  J. Varmarken,et al.  Survivorship analysis of failure pattern after revision total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Martin Bland,et al.  Retrospective cohort study of false alarm rates associated with a series of heart operations: the case for hospital mortality monitoring groups , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  D W Murray,et al.  Survival analysis of joint replacements. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  David Collett Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research , 1994 .

[8]  Nicky Best,et al.  Statistical issues in the prospective monitoring of health outcomes across multiple units , 2004 .

[9]  P. Söderman,et al.  On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[10]  P J Gregg,et al.  Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single health region in England: the results at five years from a regional hip register. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  V T Farewell,et al.  Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRTcharts for monitoring in medical contexts , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[12]  C. M. Burns,et al.  The use of cusum analysis in the early detection and management of hospital bed occupancy crises , 2005, The Medical journal of Australia.