Impact of a school district's science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third- and fourth-grade students

This article is about one school district's effort to reform its elementary science curriculum through a program of professional development called Science, Parents, Activities and Literature (Science PALs). The differential exposure of the district's K–6 teachers to Science PALs and differences in how well teachers implemented Science PALs-type inquiry strategies allowed us to conduct a quasi-experimental study of the impact of Science PALs on student achievement and attitudes. We measured achievement with an instrument based on items taken from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS; International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, 1997) and selected attitudes about science with the Student Perceptions of Classroom Climate (SPOCC; Yore et al., 1998), an instrument that we designed. Our analyses of student attitude scores as a function of years of teacher participation in Science PALs and supervisor's rating of a teacher's implementation of the project's instructional approaches showed a significant overall positive impact on student attitudes toward school science. Student TIMSS scores on multiple-choice items or constructed-response items did not improve significantly when analyzed by the number of years a student's teacher was involved in the Science PALs effort or by the supervisor's rating of that implementation. We found no significant differences in attitude or achievement scores among students taught by a series of teachers rated high, medium, or low in quality of implementation by the district's science supervisor. We discuss possible explanations for the lack of clear and positive connections between Science PALs and student performance in light of the increased focus on accountability in reform projects. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 41: 771–790, 2004

[1]  S. Loucks-Horsley,et al.  Research on Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics and Science: The State of the Scene , 1999 .

[2]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[3]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[4]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[5]  Joy A. Frechtling Teacher Enhancement Programs: A Perspective on the Last Four Decades. , 1995 .

[6]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Constructing a Framework for Elementary Science Teaching Using Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 1999 .

[7]  R. Slavin A Reader's Guide to Scientifically Based Research. , 2003 .

[8]  George G. Woodworth,et al.  A study of changes in middle school teachers' understanding of selected ideas in science as a function of an in‐service program focusing on student preconceptions , 1993 .

[9]  Thomas R. Guskey,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between Staff Development and Improvements in Student Learning. , 1996 .

[10]  Deborah C. Smith Changing Our Teaching: The Role of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Elementary Science , 1999 .

[11]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Examining the construction process: A study of changes in level 10 students' understanding of classical mechanics , 1997 .

[12]  Dana L. Kelly,et al.  International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement , 1998 .

[13]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .

[14]  J. Shymansky,et al.  Sensing the Impact of Elementary School Science Reform: A Study of Stakeholder Perceptions of Implementation, Constructivist Strategies, and School–Home Collaboration , 2005 .

[15]  J. Shymansky,et al.  Empowering Families in Hands‐on Science Programs , 2000 .

[16]  J. Kelly Science for All Americans (A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology) American Association for the Advancement of Science , 1990 .