Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications.

One of the most common findings from health services research is a failure to routinely translate research findings into daily practice. Previous systematic reviews of strategies to promote the uptake of research findings suffered from a range of methodologic problems that have been addressed in a more recent systematic review of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Changes in practitioner behavior; in the desired direction, were reported in 86% of the comparisons made. The median effect size overall was approximately 10% improvement in absolute terms. The review suggests that interventions that were previously thought to be ineffective (e.g., dissemination of educational materials) may have modest but worthwhile benefits. Also, multifaceted interventions, previously thought to be more effective than single interventions, were found to be no more effective than single interventions. Overall, there is an imperfect evidence base for decision makers to work from. Many studies had methodologic weaknesses, and reporting of this kind of research is generally poor, making the generalizability of study findings frequently uncertain. A better theoretical underpinning of studies would make this body of research more useful.

[1]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[2]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Closing the gap between research and practice : an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings , 2011 .

[3]  C. Mc Donald,et al.  Use of a computer to detect and respond to clinical events: its effect on clinician behavior. , 1976, Annals of internal medicine.

[4]  S. Shortell,et al.  Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[5]  R. Grol Successes and Failures in the Implementation of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Clinical Practice , 2001, Medical care.

[6]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  PRIME – PRocess modelling in ImpleMEntation research: selecting a theoretical basis for interventions to change clinical practice , 2003, BMC health services research.

[7]  J M Grimshaw,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  R. Grol,et al.  Personal paper: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice , 1997 .

[9]  C. Joppke RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION , 2003 .

[10]  Jeremy M. Grimshaw,et al.  Changing Provider Behavior: An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2001, Medical care.

[11]  E. McGlynn,et al.  How good is the quality of health care in the United States? , 1998, The Milbank quarterly.

[12]  A D Oxman,et al.  Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[13]  A FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF RCTs FOR COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE HEALTH , 2000 .