Challenges of multi‐actor involvement in the public sector front‐end innovation processes

Purpose – Studies with a user approach in a public service context are still rare, making the contribution of this study worthwhile. This paper aims to present a case of facilitating innovativeness by involving stakeholder groups in the development of service production in the public sector. The case is related to the provision of housing and well‐being services to ageing people. The study proposes focusing on the front‐end stage of an innovation process: the ideation phase in a virtual idea generation environment, in which fruitful and fresh ideas that are based on customers' needs are sought for in order to support the innovation process.Design/methodology/approach – A constructive research approach is applied in this study. Central theoretical building blocks are provided by the extended SECI model as presented by Uotila, Melkas and Harmaakorpi, Amabile's componential theory of creativity and Burt's and Granovetter's arguments regarding structural holes and weak ties.Findings – Based on the evaluation,...

[1]  A. Gustafsson,et al.  Harnessing the Creative Potential among Users , 2004 .

[2]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[3]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[4]  Helinä Melkas,et al.  Incorporating futures research into regional knowledge creation and management , 2005 .

[5]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[6]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Managing User Involvement in Service Innovation , 2003 .

[7]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History , 1994 .

[8]  N. Sakkab,et al.  Connect and Develop : Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation , 2006 .

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[10]  Eleanor Shaw,et al.  Social Networks: Their Impact on the Innovative Behaviour of Small Service Firms , 1998 .

[11]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[12]  J. Howells.  Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography , 2002 .

[13]  Jamal El-Den,et al.  Knowledge transformation among virtually-cooperating group members , 2008, J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Users' Contributions to Radical Innovation: Evidence from Four Cases in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology , 2006 .

[15]  Ulf R. Andersson.  Network Embeddedness and Transfer of Information and Innovation in MNCs , 2001 .

[16]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[17]  Sybille Reichert.  THE RISE OF KNOWLEDGE REGIONS: EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR UNIVERSITIES , 2006 .

[18]  I. Alam.  An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development , 2002 .

[19]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  Tomi Tura,et al.  Social capital in building regional innovative capability , 2005 .

[21]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Toward More Creative and Innovative Group Idea Generation: A Cognitive‐Social‐Motivational Perspective of Brainstorming , 2007 .

[22]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[23]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[24]  H. Melkas,et al.  Distances, Knowledge Brokerage and Absorptive Capacity in Enhancing Regional Innovativeness: A Qualitative Case Study of Lahti Region, Finland , 2011 .

[25]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , 1997 .

[28]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the black box: Telecommunications: complex, uncertain, and path dependent , 1994 .

[29]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes Social Networks and Economic Outcomes: Core Principles , 2022 .

[30]  Satu Parjanen,et al.  Innovation sessions as sources of new ideas , 2012 .

[31]  F. Tödtling,et al.  One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach , 2005 .

[32]  G. Dosi,et al.  The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’ , 2006 .

[33]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[34]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity , 2007 .

[35]  Vesa Harmaakorpi,et al.  Collective Creativity and Brokerage Functions in Heavily Cross-Disciplined Innovation Processes , 2010 .

[36]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  George P. Huber,et al.  Cross-Understanding: Implications for Group Cognition and Performance , 2010 .

[38]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Benefits of involving users in service innovation , 2003 .

[39]  Theodore J. Gordon,et al.  RT Delphi: An efficient, “round-less” almost real time Delphi method ☆ , 2006 .

[40]  Roel Rutten,et al.  Regional social capital: Embeddedness, innovation networks and regional economic development , 2007 .

[41]  M. Mumford.  Managing Creative People: Strategies and Tactics for Innovation , 2000 .

[42]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[43]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  User involvement competence for radical innovation , 2007 .

[44]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[45]  N. Sakkab.  Connect & Develop Complements Research & Develop at P&G , 2002 .

[46]  R. Burt.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2005 .

[47]  Hannele Lampela,et al.  Inter organizational learning within and by innovation networks , 2009 .

[48]  K. Lukka,et al.  The constructive approach in management accounting research , 1993 .

[49]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[50]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation , 2004 .

[51]  C. O. Scharmer.  Self-Transcending Knowledge: Organizing Around Emerging Realities , 2001 .