“I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization

Disagreements over whether polarization exists in the mass public have confounded two separate types of polarization. When social polarization is separated from issue position polarization, both sides of the polarization debate can be simultaneously correct. Social polarization, characterized by increased levels of partisan bias, activism, and anger, is increasing, driven by partisan identity and political identity alignment, and does not require the same magnitude of issue position polarization. The partisan-ideological sorting that has occurred in recent decades has caused the nation as a whole to hold more aligned political identities, which has strengthened partisan identity and the activism, bias, and anger that result from strong identities, even though issue positions have not undergone the same degree of polarization. The result is a nation that agrees on many things but is bitterly divided nonetheless. An examination of ANES data finds strong support for these hypotheses.

[1]  M. Brewer,et al.  The Rise of Partisanship and the Expansion of Partisan Conflict within the American Electorate , 2005 .

[2]  K. Deaux,et al.  Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. , 1994 .

[3]  Marc J. Hetherington,et al.  Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[4]  G. Jacobson,et al.  A Divider, Not a Uniter: George W. Bush and the American People, The 2006 Election and Beyond , 2006 .

[5]  G. Munro,et al.  Third-Party Labels Bias Evaluations of Political Platforms and Candidates , 2013 .

[6]  D. Wentura,et al.  About the impact of automaticity in the minimal group paradigm: evidence from affective priming tasks , 1999 .

[7]  G. Jacobson.  Partisan and Ideological Polarization in the California Electorate , 2004, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[8]  Larry M. Bartels.  Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions , 2002 .

[9]  S. Greene.  Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity Approach , 1999 .

[10]  H. D. Palmer,et al.  Polarization and Issue Consistency Over Time , 2011 .

[11]  L. Huddy.  From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory , 2001 .

[12]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[13]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Ariel Malka,et al.  More than Ideology: Conservative–Liberal Identity and Receptivity to Political Cues , 2010 .

[15]  Kyle L. Saunders,et al.  Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[16]  G. Jacobson.  Polarized Politics and the 2004 Congressional and Presidential Elections , 2005 .

[17]  Christopher Ellis,et al.  Ideology in America , 2012 .

[18]  Hahrie Han,et al.  The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy , 2011 .

[19]  A. Gelman,et al.  Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. , 2008, AJS; American journal of sociology.

[20]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization , 2012 .

[21]  Geoffrey C. Layman.  Religion and Political Behavior in the United States: The Impact of Beliefs, Affiliations, and Commitment from 1980 to 1994 , 1997 .

[22]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  G. Jacobson.  Partisan Polarization in Presidential Support: The Electoral Connection , 2003 .

[24]  M. Jennings,et al.  Partisan Orientations over the Long Haul: Results from the Three-Wave Political Socialization Panel Study , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[25]  T. Carsey,et al.  Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel Studies , 2002 .

[26]  Diana C. Mutz.  Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[27]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Attitude polarization: Effects of group membership. , 1984 .

[28]  Kyle L. Saunders,et al.  Is Polarization a Myth? , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[29]  A. Gerber,et al.  Personality and the Strength and Direction of Partisan Identification , 2012 .

[30]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Who Fits the Left-Right Divide? Partisan Polarization in the American Electorate , 2012 .

[31]  P. S. Nivola,et al.  Characteristics and causes of America's polarized politics , 2006 .

[32]  G. Powell.  Political Cleavage Structure, Cross-Pressure Processes, and Partisanship: An Empirical Test of the Theory , 1976 .

[33]  R. Woodberry,et al.  Fundamentalism et al: Conservative Protestants in America , 1998 .

[34]  L. Huddy,et al.  Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity , 2015, American Political Science Review.

[35]  A. Barton,et al.  Measuring Belief System Structure , 1977 .

[36]  G. King,et al.  Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching , 2012, Political Analysis.

[37]  Judith Goodstein,et al.  A political man , 2007 .

[38]  Micheal W. Giles,et al.  Racial Threat and Partisan Identification , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[39]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[40]  A. Wolfe.  One Nation, After All: What Middle-Class Americans Really Think About God, Country, Family, Racism, Welfare, Immigration, Homosexuality, Work, The Right, The Left and Each Other , 1998 .

[41]  Steven Greene,et al.  Social identity theory and party identification , 2004 .

[42]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Political Polarization in the American Public , 2008 .

[43]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America , 2004 .

[44]  BafumiJoseph,et al.  A New Partisan Voter , 2015 .

[45]  Michelle C. Bligh,et al.  Identity and Intergroup Leadership: Asymmetrical Political and National Identification in Response to Uncertainty , 2010 .

[46]  S. Greene.  The Social-Psychological Measurement of Partisanship , 2002 .

[47]  Lilliana Mason.  The Rise of Uncivil Agreement , 2013 .

[48]  J. Hampton,et al.  The people's choice. , 2001, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[49]  E. Schickler,et al.  Partisan Hearts and Minds , 2017 .

[50]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Social Identity Complexity , 2002 .

[51]  A. Abramowitz,et al.  The Bush Effect: Polarization, Turnout, and Activism in the 2004 Presidential Election , 2006 .

[52]  M. Brewer.  Multiple identities and identity transition: implications for hong kong , 1999 .

[53]  James H. Fowler,et al.  Partisanship, Voting, and the Dopamine D2 Receptor Gene , 2009, The Journal of Politics.

[54]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[55]  Geoffrey C. Layman.  The great divide : religious and cultural conflict in American party politics , 2001 .

[56]  S. Karau,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 2011 .

[57]  G. Jacobson,et al.  The Electoral Origins of Polarized Politics , 2012 .

[58]  Matthew Levendusky.  The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans , 2009 .

[59]  Kyle L. Saunders,et al.  Why Can't We All Just Get Along? The Reality of a Polarized America , 2005 .

[60]  James A. Stimson,et al.  Ideology in America: Index , 2012 .

[61]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Southern Political Science Association Polarization in the American Public : Misconceptions and Misreadings , 2011 .

[62]  Douglas Rivers,et al.  The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study , 2008 .

[63]  Eric A. Nordlinger.  Conflict regulation in divided societies , 1972 .