Technology tools to support learning design: Implications derived from an investigation of university teachers' design practices

The need to improve the quality of higher education has fostered an interest in technology tools to support effective design for teaching and learning. Over the past decade this interest has led to the development of tools to support the creation of online learning experiences, specifications to underpin design systems, and repositories to share examples. Despite this significant activity, there remain unanswered questions about what shapes university teachers' design decisions and how tools can best support their design processes. This paper presents findings from a study of university teachers' design practices that identified teachers' perceptions of student characteristics, their own beliefs and experiences, and contextual factors as key influences on design decisions. The findings extend our understanding of activities fundamental to higher education teaching and inform thinking about design support tools. Design is an important, routine part of university teaching, but is poorly supported.Technology tools to support teachers design online learning experiences are needed.We identify student, teacher and contextual characteristics that influence design.These contextualise and extend an existing conceptual model of higher education.We discuss the implications for the functionality of technology design support tools.

[1]  Grainne Conole,et al.  The design of Cloudworks: Applying social networking practice to foster the exchange of learning and teaching ideas and designs , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Sue Bennett,et al.  Learning Design: Concepts , 2008 .

[3]  Marie Schmidt,et al.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1992 .

[4]  Robert J. Yinger,et al.  Research on Teacher Thinking , 1977 .

[5]  Barry Harper,et al.  Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies , 2008 .

[6]  Elizabeth R. Peterson,et al.  Conceptions of Learning and Knowledge in Higher Education: Relationships with Study Behaviour and Influences of Learning Environments. , 2004 .

[7]  Elizabeth Masterman,et al.  Teachers’ perspectives on digital tools for pedagogic planning and design , 2011 .

[8]  Joan S. Stark,et al.  Planning introductory college courses: Content, context and form , 2000 .

[9]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  COLLAGE: A collaborative Learning Design editor based on patterns , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[10]  Shane Dawson,et al.  Informing Pedagogical Action , 2013 .

[11]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[12]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. , 1997, The British journal of educational psychology.

[13]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Patterns, designs and activities: unifying descriptions of learning structures , 2006, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[14]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Research on Teachers’ Pedagogical Thoughts, Judgments, Decisions, and Behavior , 1981 .

[15]  Eden Dahlstrom,et al.  ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2014. , 2014 .

[16]  N. Cross Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[17]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education , 2005 .

[18]  Shirley Agostinho,et al.  The use of a visual learning design representation to support the design process of teaching in higher education , 2011 .

[19]  Grainne Conole,et al.  Chapter VIII The Role of Mediating Artefacts in Learning Design , 2008 .

[20]  John B. Biggs,et al.  Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does , 1999 .

[21]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice , 2005 .

[22]  Brock Craft,et al.  A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[23]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Designing for Learning in an Open World , 2012 .

[24]  S. Bennett,et al.  Understanding the design context for Australian university teachers: implications for the future of learning design , 2011 .

[25]  Liisa Postareff,et al.  Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education , 2008 .

[26]  Freema Elbaz,et al.  Research on teacher's knowledge: the evolution of a discourse , 1991 .