Stealth identification strategy for closed loop linear time invariant system

Many identification strategies for closed loop linear time invariant system assume that an open loop system is closed by a feedback mechanism, which contains a known, linear time invariant controller. This assumption means that these identification strategies are feasible under some prior knowledge of feedback controller. To relax this assumption in some complex systems with unknown controller, a new stealth identification strategy is proposed to tackle the identification problem for closed loop linear time invariant system with unknown controller. Stealth identification modifies the closed loop system, so that the new prediction error and inverse covariance matrix are all independent of the unknown controller. This independence can simplify the problems of estimating parameter vector and designing optimal input. By using this simplified prediction error to construct an objective function, a candidate domain of attraction for the objective function is introduced and one convergence condition is derived to guarantee a given set be a candidate domain of attraction. Finally a simulation example confirms our theoretical results.

[1]  Wang Jian-hong,et al.  Further Results on Model Structure Validation for Closed Loop System Identification , 2017 .

[2]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[3]  Michel Gevers,et al.  Identification of multi-input systems: variance analysis and input design issues , 2006, Autom..

[4]  Jian-hong Wang,et al.  Model structure validation for closed-loop system identification , 2017, Int. J. Model. Identif. Control..

[5]  Xavier Bombois,et al.  Identification and the Information Matrix: How to Get Just Sufficiently Rich? , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  Closed loop experiment design for linear time invariant dynamical systems via LMIs , 2008, Autom..

[7]  Xavier Bombois,et al.  Least costly identification experiment for control , 2006, Autom..

[8]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  Finite sample properties of indirect nonparametric closed-loop identification , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  Michel Gevers,et al.  Identification For Control: Optimal Input Design With Respect To A Worst-Case $\nu$-gap Cost Function , 2002, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[10]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  Bias issues in closed loop identification with application to adaptive control , 2002, Commun. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  System Identification: A Frequency Domain Approach , 2012 .

[12]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Closed-loop identification revisited , 1999, Autom..

[13]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  From experiment design to closed-loop control , 2005, Autom..

[14]  M. Leskens,et al.  Closed-loop identification of multivariable processes with part of the inputs controlled , 2004 .

[15]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Some results on optimal experiment design , 2000, Autom..

[16]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  A virtual closed loop method for closed loop identification , 2011, Autom..

[17]  Xavier Bombois,et al.  Validity of the standard cross-correlation test for model structure validation , 2008, Autom..