Does applying a circular business model lead to organizational resilience? Mediating effects of industry 4.0 and customers integration

[1]  K. Vrancken,et al.  Toward resilient organizations after COVID-19: An analysis of circular and less circular companies , 2022, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[2]  Jonas F. Puck,et al.  Beyond addressing multicollinearity: Robust quantitative analysis and machine learning in international business research , 2022, Journal of International Business Studies.

[3]  Carla Gonçalves Machado,et al.  Dynamic capabilities for circular manufacturing supply chains—Exploring the role of Industry 4.0 and resilience , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[4]  Andrea Werner,et al.  Advancing the circular economy through dynamic capabilities and extended customer engagement: Insights from small sustainable fashion enterprises in the UK , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[5]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  Attitude Toward the Color Blue: An Ideal Marker Variable , 2022, Organizational Research Methods.

[6]  Brooks C. Holtom,et al.  Survey response rates: Trends and a validity assessment framework , 2022, Human Relations.

[7]  M. Linnenluecke,et al.  Circular economy and resilience: A research agenda , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[8]  Hendrik Birkel,et al.  The future of the circular economy and its effect on supply chain dependencies: Empirical evidence from a Delphi study , 2022, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[9]  E. Mazur-Wierzbicka Circular economy: advancement of European Union countries , 2021, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[10]  Ghasem Zaefarian,et al.  How to use instrumental variables in addressing endogeneity? A step-by-step procedure for non-specialists , 2021, Industrial Marketing Management.

[11]  D. Vogel,et al.  Nonresponse bias in public leadership research: an empirical assessment , 2021, International Public Management Journal.

[12]  Mingxiang Li Uses and abuses of statistical control variables: Ruling out or creating alternative explanations? , 2021 .

[13]  Fabio Iraldo,et al.  Sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring: Key capabilities and organizational routines for circular economy implementation , 2020 .

[14]  Lincoln C. Wood,et al.  Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: Resource melioration in logistics , 2020 .

[15]  J. Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain and the circular economy: potential tensions and critical reflections from practice , 2020 .

[16]  Alexander Newman,et al.  Addressing common method variance and endogeneity in vocational behavior research: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research , 2020 .

[17]  Mary F. Zhang,et al.  Evaluating the Use of Covariance‐Based Structural Equation Modelling with Reflective Measurement in Organizational and Management Research: A Review and Recommendations for Best Practice , 2020, British Journal of Management.

[18]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Technical Note: Recommendations for Assessing Unit Nonresponse Bias in Dyadic Focused Empirical Supply Chain Management Research , 2020, Decision Sciences.

[19]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  Industry 4.0 and resilience in the supply chain: a driver of capability enhancement or capability loss? , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[20]  Fahham Hasan Qaiser,et al.  Industry 4.0 and circular economy: Operational excellence for sustainable reverse supply chain performance , 2020 .

[21]  Surya Prakash Singh,et al.  Connecting circular economy and industry 4.0 , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[22]  Duc Truong Pham,et al.  University of Birmingham A review of emerging industry 4.0 technologies in remanufacturing , 2019 .

[23]  Moacir Godinho Filho,et al.  Who is in charge? A review and a research agenda on the ‘human side’ of the circular economy , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[24]  C. Kibert,et al.  Sustainability and resilience: A review of definitions, relationships, and their integration into a combined building assessment framework , 2019, Building and Environment.

[25]  Cyril Foropon,et al.  Examining the role of dynamic remanufacturing capability on supply chain resilience in circular economy , 2019, Management Decision.

[26]  Lucas Santos Dalenogare,et al.  Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[27]  J. Mishra,et al.  Collaboration as an enabler for circular economy: a case study of a developing country , 2019, Management Decision.

[28]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Antecedents of Resilient Supply Chains: An Empirical Study , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[29]  B. Nielsen,et al.  The selection, use, and reporting of control variables in international business research: A review and recommendations , 2018, Journal of World Business.

[30]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[31]  P. Hopkinson,et al.  Value creation from circular economy-led closed loop supply chains: a case study of fast-moving consumer goods , 2018 .

[32]  G. Tortorella,et al.  Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[33]  Ajay Das,et al.  New flexibility drivers for manufacturing, supply chain and service operations , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[34]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations , 2018, Annals of Operations Research.

[35]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: An integrative framework and research agenda , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[36]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability : a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition , 2017 .

[37]  P. Bansal,et al.  The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices , 2016 .

[38]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems , 2016 .

[39]  Christie M. Fuller,et al.  Marker Variable Choice, Reporting, and Interpretation in the Detection of Common Method Variance , 2015 .

[40]  K. Scholten,et al.  The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience , 2015 .

[41]  Chad W. Autry,et al.  A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness , 2014 .

[42]  D. Lei,et al.  Collaborative Innovation with Customers: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research , 2012 .

[43]  Chee Yew Wong,et al.  The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance , 2011 .

[44]  Ian A. Harwood,et al.  On the resilience of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2011 .

[45]  Samir Dani,et al.  Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions , 2011 .

[46]  Keely L. Croxton,et al.  ENSURING SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE: DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 2010 .

[47]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[48]  T. Pereira,et al.  Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: an overview , 2017 .

[49]  Scott J. Grawe,et al.  Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination , 2015 .

[50]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Choosing structural equation modeling computer software: Snapshots of LISREL, EQS, AMOS, and Mplus. , 2012 .

[51]  A. Panter,et al.  The structural equation modeling research report. , 2012 .