Reference levels in PTCA as a function of procedure complexity.

The multicentre assessment of a procedure complexity index (CI) for the introduction of reference levels (RLs) in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCA) is presented here. PTCAs were investigated based on methodology proposed by Bernardi et al. Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis, including clinical, anatomical and technical factors, was performed to obtain fluoroscopy time predictors. Based on these regression coefficients, a scoring system was defined and CI obtained. CI was used to classify dose values into three groups: low, medium and high complexity procedures, since there was good correlation (r = 0.41; P < 0.001) between dose-area product (DAP) and CI. CI groups were determined by an ANOVA test, and the resulting DAP and fluoroscopy time third quartiles suggested as preliminary RLs in PTCA, as a function of procedure complexity. PTCA preliminary RLs for DAP are 54, 76 and 127 Gy cm2, and 12, 20 and 27 min for fluoroscopy time, for the three CI groups.

[1]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  E. Vano,et al.  Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology , 2003, European Radiology.

[3]  E. Vañó,et al.  Dosimetric and radiation protection considerations based on some cases of patient skin injuries in interventional cardiology. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  C. Martin,et al.  Effective doses for coronary angiography. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  E Gaxiola,et al.  Real-time measurement of skin radiation during cardiac catheterization. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[6]  M. Eisenberg,et al.  Reuse of catheters for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Effects on procedure time and clinical outcomes , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  T. Vehmas.  Radiation exposure during standard and complex interventional procedures. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  M. Leesar,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of 0.010" versus 0.014" balloon PTCA systems and interventional fellow versus attending physician as primary operator in elective PTCA: economic, technical, and clinical end points. , 1995, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[9]  A. G. Brennan,et al.  Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during routine coronary angiography in a tertiary referral centre. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  T. Ryan.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  R. Padovani,et al.  Impact of EC Directive 97/43 in Interventional Radiology , 2000 .

[12]  K. Faulkner,et al.  A phantom based method for deriving typical patient doses from measurements of dose-area product on populations of patients. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  E. Vañó,et al.  Clinical and technical determinants of the complexity of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures: Analysis in relation to radiation exposure parameters , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  Mahadevappa Mahesh,et al.  Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.