Failure mode and effects analysis: an integrated approach based on rough set theory and prospect theory

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), a bottom-up method, is one of risk assessment tools to eliminate or reduce failures in design and process. It has been applied to many industries due to its flexibility and effectiveness. However, the conventional FMEA considers less about the subjectivity and vagueness in the process of risk assessment and assumes that three risk factors’ importance is the same. Although a lot of approaches based on fuzzy logic are proposed to deal with vague information in previous literature, they need priori assumptions leading to fixed intervals to express vagueness. In addition, most of the previous methods suppose that decision makers are totally rational without considering their psychological factors. To solve the problems, an extended technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is developed to improve FMEA approach, which combines the advantage of variable precision rough number in dealing with vague information and the strength of prospect theory (PT) in considering decision maker’s bounded rationality. The proposed method consists of two stages: one is the determination of risk factors’ weight function values; and the other is ranking risk priority of failure modes with the PT-based TOPSIS. Finally, a case study of a steam valve system is used to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed method.

[1]  François Beaudouin,et al.  A revision of industrial risk management: Decisions and experimental tools in risk business , 2009, Risk Decis. Anal..

[2]  Rodolfo Lourenzutti,et al.  A study of TODIM in a intuitionistic fuzzy and random environment , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Gionata Carmignani,et al.  An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Erkan Celik,et al.  Assessment of occupational hazards and associated risks in fuzzy environment: A case study of a university chemical laboratory , 2017 .

[5]  Zhaojun Li,et al.  New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA , 2001 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[8]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[10]  Dong Hoon Kim,et al.  Software FMEA analysis for safety-related application software , 2014 .

[11]  Antonella Certa,et al.  A Dempster-Shafer Theory-based approach to the Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Anette von Ahsen,et al.  Cost‐oriented failure mode and effects analysis , 2008 .

[13]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Using Cloud Model Theory and PROMETHEE Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[15]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  FMEA Using Uncertainty Theories and MCDM Methods , 2016 .

[16]  Silvia Carpitella,et al.  A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Nan Liu,et al.  Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Sanjay Kumar Chaturvedi,et al.  Criticality Assessment Models for Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis Using Fuzzy Logic , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[20]  Hossein Safari,et al.  Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR , 2014, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[21]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  A prototype genetic algorithm-enhanced rough set-based rule induction system , 2001, Comput. Ind..

[22]  Zaifang Zhang,et al.  A systematic decision-making method for evaluating design alternatives of product service system based on variable precision rough set , 2019, J. Intell. Manuf..

[23]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Developing sustainable supplier selection criteria for solar air-conditioner manufacturer: An integrated approach , 2017 .

[24]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis , 2003 .

[25]  Tiantian Bao,et al.  MADM method based on prospect theory and evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights under intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Xin Guo Ming,et al.  A rough TOPSIS Approach for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Uncertain Environments , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[27]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  Sung Ho Park,et al.  Fuzzy-based failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) of a hybrid molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) and gas turbine system for marine propulsion , 2017 .

[29]  H. Schneider Failure mode and effect analysis : FMEA from theory to execution , 1996 .

[30]  Chee Peng Lim,et al.  Application of the fuzzy Failure Mode and Effect Analysis methodology to edible bird nest processing , 2013 .

[31]  Xinguo Ming,et al.  Failure modes and effects analysis using integrated weight-based fuzzy TOPSIS , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[32]  Mohamed H. Issa,et al.  Using failure mode and effects analysis to evaluate barriers to the greening of existing buildings using the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design rating system , 2016 .

[33]  S. M. Seyed Hosseini,et al.  Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Mohammad A. Khalilzadeh,et al.  Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment , 2018, Safety Science.

[35]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment , 2014, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[36]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Research on the multi-attribute decision-making under risk with interval probability based on prospect theory and the uncertain linguistic variables , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[37]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  QFD: The problem of comparing technical/engineering design requirements , 1995 .

[38]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[39]  Qingji Zhou,et al.  Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction , 2016 .

[40]  Jian-Xin You,et al.  Systematic failure mode and effect analysis using a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making approach , 2019 .

[41]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Towards a QFD-based expert system: A novel extension to fuzzy QFD methodology using rough set theory , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Gwo-Guang Lee,et al.  Applying failure mode and effects analysis for successful knowledge management , 2015 .