Genetic Algorithm Based Optimum Semi-Active Control of Building Frames Using Limited Number of Magneto-Rheological Dampers and Sensors

Optimum semi-active control with a limited number of magneto-rheological (MR) dampers and measurement sensors has certain requirements. Most important of them is the accurate estimation of control forces developed in the MR dampers from the observations made in the structure. Therefore, the observation strategy should form an integral part of the optimization problem. The existing literature on the subject does not address this issue properly. The paper presents a computationally efficient optimization scheme for semi-active control of partially observed building frames using a limited number of MR dampers and sensors for earthquakes. The control scheme duly incorporates the locations of measurement sensors as variables into the genetic algorithm (GA) based optimization problem. A ten-storied building frame is taken as an illustrative example. The optimum control strategy utilizes two well-known control laws, namely, the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) with clipped optimal control and the bang-bang control to find the time histories of voltage to be applied to the MR dampers. The results of the numerical study show that the proposed scheme of sensor placement provides the optimum reduction of response with more computational efficiency. Second, optimal locations of sensors vary with the response quantities to be controlled, the nature of earthquake, and the control algorithm. Third, optimal locations of MR dampers are invariant of the response quantities to be controlled and the nature of earthquake.

[1]  Alex H. Barbat,et al.  Hierarchical semi-active control of base-isolated structures using a new inverse model of magnetorheological dampers , 2010 .

[2]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  NEURAL NETWORK EMULATION OF INVERSE DYNAMICS FOR A MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPER , 2002 .

[3]  Mark H. Milman,et al.  Optimization methods for passive damper placement and tuning , 1992 .

[4]  Dikai Liu,et al.  Combinatorial optimal design of number and positions of actuators in actively controlled structures using genetic algorithms , 2004 .

[5]  Young-Jin Cha,et al.  Velocity based semi‐active turbo‐Lyapunov control algorithms for seismically excited nonlinear smart structures , 2013 .

[6]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Smart Semi-Active MR Damper to Control the Structural Response , 2015 .

[7]  Hamid Reza Karimi,et al.  Frequency domain control based on quantitative feedback theory for vibration suppression in structures equipped with magnetorheological dampers , 2009 .

[8]  Dikai Liu,et al.  Multi-level optimal design of buildings with active control under winds using genetic algorithms , 2000 .

[9]  Seyed Mehdi Zahrai,et al.  Semi-active seismic control of an 11-DOF building model with TMD+MR damper using type-1 and -2 fuzzy algorithms , 2018 .

[10]  T. T. Soong,et al.  A STOCHASTIC OPTIMAL SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL STRATEGY FOR ER/MR DAMPERS , 2003 .

[11]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS , 1997 .

[12]  Chunho Chang,et al.  Control performance evaluation of semi-active tmd subjected to various types of loads , 2015 .

[13]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[14]  Makola M. Abdullah,et al.  Placement of sensors/actuators on civil structures using genetic algorithms , 2001 .

[15]  Seung-Yong Ok,et al.  Optimal design of hysteretic dampers connecting adjacent structures using multi-objective genetic algorithm and stochastic linearization method , 2008 .

[16]  Hiroshi Furuya,et al.  Placing actuators on space structures by genetic algorithms and effectiveness indices , 1995 .

[17]  S. M. ZAHRAI,et al.  SEMI-ACTIVE SEISMIC CONTROL OF MID-RISE STRUCTURES USING MAGNETO-RHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS AND TWO PROPOSED IMPROVING MECHANISMS , 2014 .

[18]  B. F. Spencer,et al.  STATE OF THE ART OF STRUCTURAL CONTROL , 2003 .

[19]  Mehmet E. Uz,et al.  Optimal design of semi active control for adjacent buildings connected by mr damper based on integrated fuzzy logic and multi-objective genetic algorithm , 2014 .

[20]  B. Farahmand Azar,et al.  Semi‐active direct control method for seismic alleviation of structures using MR dampers , 2013 .

[21]  Carlos A. Mota Soares,et al.  Optimal design in vibration control of adaptive structures using a simulated annealing algorithm , 2006 .

[22]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study , 2000 .

[23]  Abdelhafid Ounis,et al.  Pounding hazard mitigation between adjacent planar buildings using coupling strategy , 2016 .

[24]  Mahendra P. Singh,et al.  Optimal seismic response control with dampers , 2001 .

[25]  Michael L Delorenzo Sensor and actuator selection for large space structure control , 1990 .

[26]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Acceleration Feedback Control of MDOF Structures , 1996 .

[27]  Wl L. Qu,et al.  Seismic response control of frame structures using magnetorheological/electrorheological dampers , 2000 .

[28]  Singiresu S Rao,et al.  Optimal placement of actuators in actively controlled structures using genetic algorithms , 1991 .

[29]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Semi‐active neurocontrol of a base‐isolated benchmark structure , 2006 .

[30]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Seismic Design of Viscoelastic Dampers for Structural Applications , 1992 .

[31]  Young-Jin Cha,et al.  Optimal placement of active control devices and sensors in frame structures using multi‐objective genetic algorithms , 2013 .

[32]  Nicholas Fisco,et al.  Smart structures: Part I—Active and semi-active control , 2011 .

[33]  Ananth Ramaswamy,et al.  Multi‐objective optimal design of FLC driven hybrid mass damper for seismically excited structures , 2002 .

[34]  Nicholas Fisco,et al.  Smart structures: Part II — Hybrid control systems and control strategies , 2011 .

[35]  S. M. Dumne,et al.  Earthquake response of asymmetric building with MR damper , 2014, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.